Reduction of the occurrence of incorrect stunning and the occurrence of reflexes and reactions in cattle after pneumatically powered captive-bolt stunning in comparison with cartridge-fired captive-bolt stunning
Jazyk angličtina Země Austrálie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
35470517
DOI
10.1111/asj.13728
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- bulls and cows, reflexes and reactions, repeat stunning, stun shot deviations, welfare,
- MeSH
- bezvědomí veterinární MeSH
- jatka * MeSH
- nemoci skotu * MeSH
- pohoda zvířat MeSH
- reflex MeSH
- skot MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- skot MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
In this study, the occurrence of repeat stunning, deviations in placement and direction of stun shots, and the occurrence of reflexes/reactions following stunning with a pneumatically powered captive-bolt stunner in comparison with a cartridge-fired captive-bolt stunner in cattle were assessed. Repeat stunning and deviations in placement and direction of the stun shots were less frequent (p < 0.01) with the use of a pneumatic stunner in all cattle. The rate of repeat stunning and deviation from the ideal place and direction of stun shots were lower (5.81%, 24.75%, and 9.60% of all animals, respectively) when a pneumatic stunner was used in comparison with cartridge-fired captive bolt (18.32%, 34.03%, and 47.38% of all animals, respectively). The stunning quality was assessed on the basis of evaluation of signs observed following the stun shot. A pneumatic stunning resulted in a significant reduction of occurrence of signs particularly in bulls in comparison to cows, for which a cartridge-fired stunner already provides an adequate stunning. Our study provides evidence that pneumatic stunning has the potential to be a more effective method than cartridge-fired stunning from the viewpoint of the welfare of slaughtered animals. Pneumatic stunning ensures a high quality of stunning in both bulls and cows.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Atkinson, S., Velarde, A., & Algers, B. (2013). Assessment of stun quality at commercial slaughter in cattle shot with captive bolt. Animal Welfare, 22, 473-481. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.4.473
Bourguet, C., Deiss, V., Tannugi, C. C., & Terlouw, E. M. C. (2011). Behavioural and physiological reactions of cattle in a commercial abattoir: Relationships with organisational aspects of the abattoir and animal characteristics. Meat Science, 88, 158-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.12.017
Czech Republic. (2012). Decree No 418/2012 Coll., on the protection of animals at the time of killing. Collection of Laws, 153, 5362-5374.
Dorfler, K., Troeger, K., Lautenschlager, R., Schonekess, H. C., Jager, F., & Lucker, E. (2013). Kinetic energy and efficiency of different captive bolt stunning methods. Fleischwirtschaft, 93, 91-96.
European Union. (2009). Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing. Official Journal of the European Union, L303, 1-30.
Finnie, J. W. (2001). Animal models of traumatic brain injury: A review. Australian Veterinary Journal, 79(9), 628-633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2001.tb10785.x
Fries, R., Schrohe, K., Lotz, F., & Arndt, G. (2012). Application of captive bolt to cattle stunning - A survey of stunner placement under practical conditions. Animal, 6(7), 1124-1128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111002667
Gibson, T. J., Ridler, A. L., Lamb, C. R., Williams, A., Giles, S., & Gregory, N. G. (2012). Preliminary evaluation of the effectiveness of captive-bolt guns as a killing method without exsanguination for horned and unhorned sheep. Animal Welfare, 21, 35-42. https://doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13353700593446
Gibson, T. J., Whitehead, C., Taylor, R., Sykes, O., Chancellor, N. M., & Limon, G. (2015). Pathophysiology of penetrating captive bolt stunning in Alpacas (Vicugna pacos). Meat Science, 100, 227-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.10.022
Gilliam, J., Shearer, J., Woods, J., Hill, J., Reynolds, J., Taylor, J., Bahr, R. J., Crochik, S., & Snider, T. (2012). Captive-bolt euthanasia of cattle: Determination of optimal-shot placement and evaluation of the Cash Special Euthanizer Kit® for euthanasia of cattle. Animal Welfare, 21, 99-102. https://doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13353700593806
Gilliam, J. N., Shearer, J., Bahr, R., Crochik, S., Woods, J., Hill, J., Reynolds, J., & Taylor, J. D. (2016). Evaluation of brainstem disruption following penetrating captive-bolt shot in isolated cattle heads: Comparison of traditional and alternative shotplacement landmarks. Animal Welfare, 25, 347-353. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.25.3.347
Gouveia, K. G., Ferreira, P. G., de Costa, J. C., Vaz-Pires, P., & da Costa, P. M. (2009). Assessment of the efficiency of captive-bolt stunning in cattle and feasibility of associated behavioural signs. Animal Welfare, 18, 171-175.
Grandin, T. (2002). Return-to-sensibility problems after penetrating captive bolt stunning of cattle in commercial beef slaughter plants. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 221, 1258-1261. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2002.221.1258
Grandin, T. (2013). Making slaughterhouses more humane for cattle, pigs, and sheep. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 1, 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103713
Grandin, T. (2019). Recommended animal handling guidelines and audit guide for cattle, pigs, and sheep. American Meat Institute Foundation.
Grandin, T. (2020). Determining unconsciousness and insensibility in commercial abattoirs. In The slaughter of farmed animals: Practical ways of enhancing animal welfare (pp. 194-201). CABI Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789240573.0193
Gregory, N. G., Lee, C. J., & Widdicombe, J. P. (2007). Depth of concussion in cattle shot by penetrating captive bolt. Meat Science, 77, 499-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.026
Kamenik, J., Paral, V., Pyszko, M., & Voslarova, E. (2019). Cattle stunning with a penetrative captive bolt device: A review. Animal Science Journal, 90, 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13168
Oliveira, S. E. O., Gregory, N. G., Costa, F. A. D., Gibson, T. J., & da Costa, M. J. R. P. (2017). Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun. Meat Science, 130, 64-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.007
Terlouw, C., Bourguet, C., & Deiss, V. (2016a). Consciousness, unconsciousness and death in the context of slaughter. Part I. Neurobiological mechanisms underlying stunning and killing. Meat Science, 118, 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.03.011
Terlouw, C., Bourguet, C., & Deiss, V. (2016b). Consciousness, unconsciousness and death in the context of slaughter. Part II. Evaluation methods. Meat Science, 118, 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.03.010
Terlouw, E. M. C. (2020). The physiology of the brain and determining insensibility and unconsciousness. In The slaughter of farmed animals: Practical ways of enhancing animal welfare (pp. 202-228). CABI Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789240573.0202
Terlouw, E. M. C., Bourguet, C., Deiss, V., & Mallet, C. (2015). Origins of movements following stunning and during bleeding in cattle. Meat Science, 110, 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.07.010
Vecerek, V., Kamenik, J., Voslarova, E., Vecerkova, L., Machovcova, Z., Volfova, M., & Konvalinova, J. (2020). The occurrence of reflexes and reactions in cattle following stunning with a captive bolt at the slaughterhouse. Animal Science Journal, 91, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13373
Vecerek, V., Kamenik, J., Voslarova, E., Volfova, M., Machovcova, Z., Konvalinova, J., & Vecerkova, L. (2020). The impact of deviation of the stun shot from the ideal point on motor paralysis in cattle. Animals, 10, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020280
Verhoeven, M. T. W., Gerritzen, M. A., Hellebrekers, L. J., & Kemp, B. (2015). Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: A review. Animal, 9, 320-330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114002596
von Holleben, K., Schneider, Y., & von Wenzlawowicz, M. (2018). Study on the eligibility of a pneumatic captive bolt stunner for cattle stunning under routine conditions [80/h]. Fleischwirtschaft, 98, 94-98.
von Wenzlawowicz, M., von Holleben, K., & Eser, E. (2012). Identifying reasons for stun failures in slaughterhouses for cattle and pigs: A field study. Animal Welfare, 21, 51-60. https://doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13353700593527
Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical analysis (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.