The European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society registry, a tool to assess the prognosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
35472579
DOI
10.1016/j.ejca.2022.03.007
PII: S0959-8049(22)00147-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Neuroendocrine neoplasms, Prognosis, Registry, Survival, Treatment,
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Pancreatic Neoplasms * pathology MeSH
- Neuroendocrine Tumors * pathology MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Registries * MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Somatostatin MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Somatostatin MeSH
BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare tumours with variable clinical behaviour. Their natural history is ideally best approached in large, multicentre and multinational registries with long-term patients' follow-up. The European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society registry aims to obtain information regarding NEN outcomes and prognostic factors in a European frame. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected data from 7 national NEN registries (Belgium, Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Poland, Spain, Switzerland), representing 10,102 patients. Anonymised/pseudonymised data were collected in a secured server. Descriptive statistical methods were applied, as well as Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable analyses for prognostic factors of overall survival (OS). RESULTS: median age of the study population was 60 years (range: 18-102), 48% were female. Common primary tumour sites were pancreas (27%) and small intestine (21%). Stage 4 disease was found in 47% of patients, while 26/10/16% had stage 1/2/3 disease, respectively. Grading (n = 6952) was G1/2/3 in 48/37/15% of the patients, respectively. Surgery was the main treatment, provided to 71% of patients, followed by somatostatin analogues (32%), chemotherapy (20%), Peptide receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) (9%) and targeted therapies (8%). OS at 5 years was 74%, influenced by grade, stage and tissue of origin in multivariate analysis. A Ki67 cut-off value set at 55% within the G3 group allowed to separate 2 groups with a meaningful different OS. CONCLUSION: We report the first analysis of the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society registry, comprising 10,102 patients with NEN from 7 European countries. This large cohort study describes prognostic factors for the survival of NENs throughout Europe, including primary tumour site, grade, stage and treatment.
Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Hamburg Germany
Charité University Hospital Berlin Gastroenterology Department Berlin Germany
Department of Oncology Inselspital Bern University Hospital University of Bern Switzerland
Hepato gastroenterology Unit Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc Bruxelles Belgium
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias Medical Oncology Oviedo Asturias Spain
Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada Pathology Unit Madrid Spain
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven UZ Leuven Digestive Oncology Hepatology Leuven Belgium
Oncology Department Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre IIS Imas12 UCM CNIO CIBERONC Madrid Spain
Universitätsspital Basel Endocrinology Diabetology and Metabolism Basel Switzerland
References provided by Crossref.org