Circulating Tumour DNA Is a Strong Predictor of Outcomes in Patients Treated with Systemic Therapy for Urothelial Carcinoma
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
35562252
DOI
10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.017
PII: S2405-4569(22)00112-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Circulating tumour DNA, Systemic therapy, Urothelial carcinoma,
- MeSH
- cirkulující nádorová DNA * genetika MeSH
- karcinom z přechodných buněk * farmakoterapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * farmakoterapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- Názvy látek
- cirkulující nádorová DNA * MeSH
We summarise the available data for and assess the prognostic value of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in patients treated with systemic therapy for urothelial carcinoma (UC). Studies were deemed eligible if they reported on oncologic outcomes for patients with UC treated with systemic therapy according to the baseline ctDNA profile (before starting systemic therapy) and/or changes over the course of therapy. Five studies met the eligibility criteria. We found a strong association between high baseline ctDNA levels and worse disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio [HR] 3.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.58-4.84) and overall survival (OS; HR 2.99, 95% CI 2.17-4.13). Patients with a decline in ctDNA level after immunotherapy had better DFS (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.49) and OS (HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.42) in comparison to patients without a ctDNA decline. Conversely, an increase in ctDNA levels after immunotherapy was associated with worse survival outcomes. Patients with UC who exhibited a decrease in ctDNA levels during systemic therapy had better survival outcomes compared to those with stable or increasing ctDNA levels. PATIENT SUMMARY: Measurement of tumour DNA in blood may help in identifying patients with cancer of the urinary tract who are unlikely to respond to chemotherapy or immunotherapy. This could serve as a biomarker for monitoring cancer treatment.
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org