Confirmed disability progression as a marker of permanent disability in multiple sclerosis
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
35582938
PubMed Central
PMC9539581
DOI
10.1111/ene.15406
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- CLARITY, clinical trial, functional system impairment, risk scoring, sustained disability progression,
- MeSH
- kladribin terapeutické užití MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- posuzování pracovní neschopnosti * MeSH
- progrese nemoci MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- relabující-remitující roztroušená skleróza MeSH
- roztroušená skleróza * farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- kladribin MeSH
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The prevention of disability over the long term is the main treatment goal in multiple sclerosis (MS); however, randomized clinical trials evaluate only short-term treatment effects on disability. This study aimed to define criteria for 6-month confirmed disability progression events of MS with a high probability of resulting in sustained long-term disability worsening. METHODS: In total, 14,802 6-month confirmed disability progression events were identified in 8741 patients from the global MSBase registry. For each 6-month confirmed progression event (13,321 in the development and 1481 in the validation cohort), a sustained progression score was calculated based on the demographic and clinical characteristics at the time of progression that were predictive of long-term disability worsening. The score was externally validated in the Cladribine Tablets Treating Multiple Sclerosis Orally (CLARITY) trial. RESULTS: The score was based on age, sex, MS phenotype, relapse activity, disability score and its change from baseline, number of affected functional system domains and worsening in six of the domains. In the internal validation cohort, a 61% lower chance of improvement was estimated with each unit increase in the score (hazard ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.52; discriminatory index 0.89). The proportions of progression events sustained at 5 years stratified by the score were 1: 72%; 2: 88%; 3: 94%; 4: 100%. The results of the CLARITY trial were confirmed for reduction of disability progression that was >88% likely to be sustained (events with score ˃1.5). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicodemographic characteristics of 6-month confirmed disability progression events identify those at high risk of sustained long-term disability. This knowledge will allow future trials to better assess the effect of therapy on long-term disability accrual.
Austin Health Melbourne Vic Australia
Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale San Giuseppe Moscati Avellino Avellino Italy
Bakirkoy Education and Research Hospital for Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases Istanbul Turkey
Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences Mumbai India
Brain and Mind Centre Sydney NSW Australia
Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Vic Australia
Central Military Emergency University Hospital Titu Maiorescu University Bucharest Romania
CHUM and Universite de Montreal Montreal QC Canada
CISSS Chaudière Appalache Levis QC Canada
Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc Brussels Belgium
CORe Department of Medicine University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia
Craigavon Area Hospital Craigavon UK
CSSS Saint Jerome Saint Jérôme QC Canada
Department of Basic Medical Sciences Neuroscience and Sense Organs University of Bari Bari Italy
Department of General Medicine Parma University Hospital Parma Italy
Department of Health Sciences University of Genoa Genoa Italy
Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Parma Parma Italy
Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary
Department of Neurology John Hunter Hospital Hunter New England Health Newcastle NSW Australia
Department of Neurology Razi Hospital Manouba Tunisia
Department of Neurology The Alfred Hospital Melbourne Vic Australia
Department of Neurology Zuyderland Medical Center Sittard Geleen The Netherlands
Department of Neuroscience Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Modena Italy
Department of Neuroscience Imaging and Clinical Sciences University G d'Annunzio Chieti Italy
Department of Rehabilitaiton ML Novarese Hospital Moncrivello Italy
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie Università di Bologna Bologna Italia
Division of Neurology Department of Medicine Amiri Hospital Sharq Kuwait
Dokuz Eylul University Konak Izmir Turkey
Flinders University Adelaide SA Australia
Geelong Hospital Geelong Vic Australia
Groene Hart Ziekenhuis Gouda The Netherlands
Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital Istanbul Turkey
Hopital Notre Dame Montreal QC Canada
Hospital de Galdakao Usansolo Galdakao Spain
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante Alicante Spain
Hospital Italiano Buenos Aires Argentina
Hospital Universitario de la Ribera Alzira Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena Sevilla Spain
INEBA Institute of Neuroscience Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina
Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases Murdoch University Perth WA Australia
IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna Bologna Italia
IRCCS Mondino Foundation Pavia Italy
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran
Jahn Ferenc Teaching Hospital Budapest Hungary
Jewish General Hospital Montreal QC Canada
KTU Medical Faculty Farabi Hospital Trabzon Turkey
Liverpool Hospital Sydney NSW Australia
Medical Faculty 19 Mayis University Samsun Turkey
Melbourne MS Centre Department of Neurology Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne Australia
Monash Medical Centre Melbourne Vic Australia
Nemocnice Jihlava Jihlava Czech Republic
Neuro Rive Sud Greenfield Park QC Canada
Neurology Department King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam Dammam Saudi Arabia
Ospedali Riuniti di Salerno Salerno Italy
Perron Institute University of Western Australia Nedlands WA Australia
Rehabilitation and MS Centre Overpelt and Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Brisbane Qld Australia
Royal Hobart Hospital Hobart TAS Australia
School of Medicine and Public Health University Newcastle Newcastle NSW Australia
Semmelweis University Budapest Budapest Hungary
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands WA Australia
St Vincents Hospital Fitzroy Melbourne Vic Australia
Universidade Metropolitana de Santos Santos Brazil
Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain la Neuve Belgium
University hospital Aarhus Aarhus Denmark
University of Queensland Brisbane Qld Australia
UOC Neurologia Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale Marche AV3 Macerata Italy
Zobrazit více v PubMed
CAMMS223 Trial Investigators . Alemtuzumab vs. interferon beta‐1a in early multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(17):1786‐1801. PubMed
Polman CH, O'connor PW, Havrdova E, et al. A randomized, placebo‐controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(9):899‐910. PubMed
Rudick RA, Stuart WH, Calabresi PA, et al. Natalizumab plus interferon beta‐1a for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(9):911‐923. PubMed
Kalincik T, Cutter G, Spelman T, et al. Defining reliable disability outcomes in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2015;138(11):3287‐3298. PubMed
Healy BC, Engler D, Glanz B, Musallam A, Chitnis T. Assessment of definitions of sustained disease progression in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Int. 2013;2013:1‐9. PubMed PMC
Scott T, Wang P, You X, Mann M, Sperling B. Relationship between sustained disability progression and functional system scores in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: analysis of placebo data from four randomized clinical trials. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;44(1):16‐23. PubMed
Scott T, You X, Foulds P. Functional system scores provide a window into disease activity occurring during a multiple sclerosis treatment trial. Neurol Res. 2011;33(5):549‐552. PubMed
Butzkueven H, Chapman J, Cristiano E, et al. MSBase: an international, online registry and platform for collaborative outcomes research in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2006;12(6):769‐774. PubMed
Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(2):292‐302. PubMed PMC
Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald criteria”. Ann Neurol. 2005;58(6):840‐846. PubMed
Kalincik T, Kuhle J, Pucci E, et al. Data quality evaluation for observational multiple sclerosis registries. Mult Scler J. 2017;23(5):647‐655. PubMed
Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15(4):361‐387. PubMed
Giovannoni G, Comi G, Cook S, et al. A placebo‐controlled trial of oral cladribine for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(5):416‐426. PubMed
R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018.
Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA, et al. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology. 2014;83(3):278‐286. PubMed PMC
Belachew S, Phan‐Ba R, Bartholomé E, et al. Natalizumab induces a rapid improvement of disability status and ambulation after failure of previous therapy in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18(2):240‐245. PubMed
Kalincik T, Brown JWL, Robertson N, et al. Treatment effectiveness of alemtuzumab compared with natalizumab, fingolimod, and interferon beta in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: a cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(4):271‐281. PubMed
Giovannoni G, Cutter G, Sormani MP, et al. Is multiple sclerosis a length‐dependent central axonopathy? The case for therapeutic lag and the asynchronous progressive MS hypotheses. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017;12:70‐78. PubMed
Hirst CL, Ingram G, Swingler R, Compston A, Pickersgill TP, Robertson NP. Change in disability in patients with multiple sclerosis: a 20 year prospective population based analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:1137‐1143. PubMed
D'Souza M, Yaldizli Ö, John R, et al. Neurostatus e‐scoring improves consistency of Expanded Disability Status Scale assessments: a proof of concept study. Mult Scler J. 2017;23(4):597‐603. PubMed
Amato MP, Fratiglioni L, Groppi C, Siracusa G, Amaducci L. Interrater reliability in assessing functional systems and disability on the Kurtzke scale in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1988;45(7):746‐748. PubMed
Brown JWL, Coles A, Horakova D, et al. Association of initial disease‐modifying therapy with later conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. JAMA. 2019;321(2):175‐187. PubMed PMC