INTRODUCTION: The circumflex scapular artery (CSA) has been described in detail in the literature, but the groove, i.e., the circumflex sulcus (CFS), formed by the artery on the lateral pillar of the scapula has been completely neglected. The aim of the present study was to describe the variability and anatomy of the CFS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was based on the examination of 103 pairs of dry bone specimens of adult scapulae, i.e., 206 specimens, including 92 (46 pairs) male and 114 (57 pairs) female specimens. In the first step, quantitative criteria were defined for assessment of the CFS presence and type. Subsequently, statistical analysis of the obtained data was performed. RESULTS: The study revealed considerable variability of the arterial groove, which was well developed in 33% (type A), shallow in 40% (type B), and absent in 27% (type C) of cases. The mean distance between CFS and the infraglenoid tubercle was 3.3 cm CI0.95 (3.1-3.3), which corresponds to the proximal third of the lateral border of the scapula. CONCLUSION: The study has confirmed variability of the arterial groove (CFS) and its localization in relation to the inferior glenoid rim. The findings are clinically important, particularly in relation to the Judet approach to scapular fractures (localization of the CSA course).

Department of Orthopedics 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and the Central Military Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Institute of Anatomy 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Alfaro-Gomez U, Fuentes-Ramirez LD, Chavez-Blanco KI et al (2020) Anatomical variations of the acromial and coracoid process: clinical relevance. Surg Radiol Anat 42:877–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02497-5 PubMed DOI

Al-Redouan A, Kachlik D (2022) Scapula revisited: new features identified and denoted by terms using consensus method of Delphi and taxonomy panel to be implemented in radiologic and surgical practice. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 31:e68–e81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.020 PubMed DOI

Armitage BM, Wijdicks CA, Tarkin IS et al (2009) Mapping of scapular fractures with three-dimensional computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2222–2228. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00881 PubMed DOI

Bartoníček J (2015) Scapular fractures. In: Courtbrown CH, Heckman AD, Mcmqqueen MM, Ricci WM, Tornetta P (eds) Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, 8th edn. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, pp 1475–1501

Bartoníček J, Frič V (2011) Scapular body fractures: results of the operative treatment. Int Orthop 35:747–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1072-y PubMed DOI

Bartoníček J, Klika D, Tuček M (2018) Classification of scapular body fractures. Rozhl Chir 97:67–76 PubMed

Bartoníček J, Tuček M, Luňáček L (2008) Judet posterior approach to scapula. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 75:429–435 PubMed

Burke CS, Roberts CS, Nyland JA, Radmacher PG, Acland RD, Voor MJ (2006) Scapular thickness—implications for fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:645–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.10.005 PubMed DOI

Casier SJ, Van den Broecke R, Van Houcke J, Audenaert E, De Wilde LF, Van Tongel A (2018) Morphologic variations of the scapula in 3-dimensions: a statistical shape model approach. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27:2224–2231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.001 PubMed DOI

Donders JCE, Prins J, Kloen P, at al, (2020) Three-dimensional topography of scapular nutrient foramina. Surg Radiol Anat 42:887–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02441-7 PubMed DOI PMC

Dupont R, Evrard H (1932) Sur une voie d’accès postérieure de l’omoplate. J Chir 39:528–534

Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Haman SP, Mielder JD, Yeasting RA (2000) Quantitative anatomy of the scapula. Am J Orthop 29:287–292 PubMed

Ebraheim NA, Ramineni SK, Alla SR, Biyani S, Yeasting RA (2010) Anatomical basis of the vascular risk related to the circumflex scapular artery during posterior approach to the scapula. Surg Radiol Anat 32:51–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0544-5 PubMed DOI

Edelson JG (1996) Variations in the anatomy of the scapula with reference to the snapping scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res 322:111–115 DOI

Frazer JES (1946) The anatomy of the human skeleton. Churchill, London

Galino M, Santamaria E, Doro T (1998) Anthropometry of the scapula: clinical and surgical consideration. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7:284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1058-2746(98)90057-x DOI

Gumina S, Postachini F, Orsina L, Cinotti G (1999) The morphometry of coracoid process—its aetiologic role in subcoracoid impingement syndrome. Int Orthop 23:198–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002640050349 PubMed DOI PMC

Hovelacque A (1933) Ostéologie. Fascicule 1. Paris, Doin & Cie.

Idrac M (1935) Fracture du col chirurgical de l´omoplate. Bull Soc Med Mil Fr 29:205–208

Johnston TB, Davies DV, Davies F (eds) (1958) Gray´s anatomy, 32nd edn. Longmans, Green and Co., London

Kalný J (1962) Foramina nutricia a canales nutricii na lopatce a na pánevní kosti. [Foramina nutricia and canales nutricii on the scapula and pelvic bone]. Plz Lék Sbor 25–34

Karelse A, Kegels L, de Wilde L (2005) The pillars of the scapula. Clin Anat 20:392–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20420 DOI

Li MM, Goetti P, Sandman E, Rouleau DM (2020) Influence of coracoid anatomy on the location of glenoid rim defects in anterior shoulder instability: 3D CT-scan evaluation of 51 patients. Surg Radiol Anat 42:895–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02492-w PubMed DOI

Mallon WJ, Brown HR, Vogler JB, Martinez S (1982) Radiographic and geometric anatomy of the scapula. Clin Orthop Rel Res 277:142–154

Ogden JA, Phillips SB (1983) Radiology of postnatal skeletal development. VII. The scapula. Skeletal Radiol 9:157–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352547 PubMed DOI

Pachner P (1937) Pohlavní rozdíly na lidské pánvi [Sex differences in the human pelvis]. In Czech. Česká akademie věd a umění, Praha

Rauber-Kopsch (1952) Lehrbuch und Atlas der Anatomie des Menschen, Band 1. 18. Auflage. Leipzig, Thieme

Shin KJ, Kim JN, Lee SH et al (2016) Arterial supply and anastomotic pattern of the infraspinous fossa focusing on the surgical significance. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69:512–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.12.013 PubMed DOI

Singh N, Chauhan P, Loh HK, Kohli M, Suri RK (2018) Enigma of scapular foramen and tunnels: an untold story. Surg Radiol Anat 40:327–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-017-1931-y PubMed DOI

Strnad T, Bartoníček J, Naňka O, Tuček M (2021) The coracoglenoid notch: anatomy and clinical significance. Surg Radiol Anat 43:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02527-2 PubMed DOI

Testut L (1904) Traité d´anatomie humaine. Doin, Paris, pp 262–267

Totlis T, Konstantidinis GA, Karanassos MT et al (2014) Bony structures related to snapping scapula: correlation to gender, side and age. Surg Radiol Anat 36:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1130-4 PubMed DOI

Tuček M, Bartoníček J, Frič V (2011) Kostní anatomie lopatky: Její význam pro klasifikaci zlomenin těla lopatky [Osseous anatomy of scapula: Its importance for classification of scapular body]. Ortopedie 5:104–109

Tuček M, Naňka O, Malík J, Bartoníček J (2014) Scapular glenopolar angle: Standard values and side differences. Skeletal Radiol 43:1583–1587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-1977-4 PubMed DOI

Vavken P, Heinrich KM, Koppelhuber C, Rois S, Dorotka R (2009) The use of confidence intervals in reporting orthopaedic research findings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:3334–3339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0817-7 PubMed DOI PMC

von Schroeder HP, Kuiper SD, Botte MJ (2001) Osseous anatomy of the scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res 383:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200102000-00015 DOI

White DT, Black TM, Folkens AP (2012) Human osteology, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

Zhang L, Guo X, Liu Y et al (2019) Classification of the superior angle of the scapula and its correlation with the suprascapular notch: a study on 303 scapulae. Surg Radiol Anat 41:377–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2156-4 PubMed DOI