Fundamental social motives measured across forty-two cultures in two waves
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
1822713
National Science Foundation (NSF)
1822713
National Science Foundation (NSF)
1822713
National Science Foundation (NSF)
1822713
National Science Foundation (NSF)
2018/01347-8
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (São Paulo Research Foundation)
2017/11748-7
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (São Paulo Research Foundation)
68081740
Akademie Věd České Republiky (Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic)
17-14387S
Grantová Agentura České Republiky (Grant Agency of the Czech Republic)
DIUFRO DI20-0080
Universidad de La Frontera (University of the Frontier)
PubMed
35974021
PubMed Central
PMC9380674
DOI
10.1038/s41597-022-01579-w
PII: 10.1038/s41597-022-01579-w
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
How does psychology vary across human societies? The fundamental social motives framework adopts an evolutionary approach to capture the broad range of human social goals within a taxonomy of ancestrally recurring threats and opportunities. These motives-self-protection, disease avoidance, affiliation, status, mate acquisition, mate retention, and kin care-are high in fitness relevance and everyday salience, yet understudied cross-culturally. Here, we gathered data on these motives in 42 countries (N = 15,915) in two cross-sectional waves, including 19 countries (N = 10,907) for which data were gathered in both waves. Wave 1 was collected from mid-2016 through late 2019 (32 countries, N = 8,998; 3,302 male, 5,585 female; Mage = 24.43, SD = 7.91). Wave 2 was collected from April through November 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic (29 countries, N = 6,917; 2,249 male, 4,218 female; Mage = 28.59, SD = 11.31). These data can be used to assess differences and similarities in people's fundamental social motives both across and within cultures, at different time points, and in relation to other commonly studied cultural indicators and outcomes.
Behavioral Science University of Chicago Chicago IL 60637 USA
Center of Social and Psychological Sciences Slovak Academy of Sciences 841 04 Bratislava Slovakia
College of Nursing University of Hail Hail 55476 Saudi Arabia
Department of Bulgarian Language Sofia University Sofia Bulgaria
Department of Community Sustainability Michigan State University East Lansing MI 48824 USA
Department of Economic Psychology Johannes Kepler University Linz 4040 Linz Austria
Department of Economics University of Exeter Business School Exeter EX4 4PU England UK
Department of Education Hubei University Wuhan Hubei 430061 China
Department of Management and Economics Universidad de La Frontera Temuco Araucanía Chile
Department of Management Ben Gurion University of the Negev Beer Sheva 84105 Israel
Department of Peace and Conflict Research Uppsala University 753 20 Uppsala Sweden
Department of Psychology Aberystwyth University Aberystwyth SY23 3UX Wales UK
Department of Psychology Adnan Menderes University 09010 Aydın Turkey
Department of Psychology Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu Alike Ebonyi State Nigeria
Department of Psychology Arizona State University Tempe AZ 85287 USA
Department of Psychology Ben Gurion University of the Negev Beer Sheva 84105 Israel
Department of Psychology Faculty of Philosophy University of Niš Niš 18000 Serbia
Department of Psychology Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz Bogotá Colombia
Department of Psychology Oklahoma State University Stillwater OK 74078 USA
Department of Psychology Sogang University Seoul 04107 South Korea
Department of Psychology TOBB University of Economics and Technology 06510 Ankara Turkey
Department of Psychology Toronto Metropolitan University Toronto Ontario M5B 2K3 Canada
Department of Psychology Universidad de los Andes Bogotá Cundinamarca Colombia
Department of Psychology University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar Dakar 10700 Senegal
Department of Psychology University of Amsterdam 1018 WS Amsterdam Netherlands
Department of Psychology University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli 81100 Caserta Italy
Department of Psychology University of Colorado Colorado Springs CO 80309 USA
Department of Psychology University of Hamburg 20146 Hamburg Germany
Department of Psychology University of Haripur Haripur 22620 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan
Department of Psychology University of Nigeria Nsukka Nigeria
Department of Psychology University of Waterloo Waterloo Ontario N2L 3G1 Canada
Department of Psychology Yonsei University Seoul 03722 South Korea
Department of Sociology University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar Dakar 10700 Senegal
Department of Sustainable Health University of Groningen 8911CE Leeuwarden Netherlands
Division of Psychology Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet 171 77 Solna Sweden
eduLab21 Ayrton Senna Institute São Paulo 05423 040 Brazil
Experimental Research Unit Department of Psychology Universidad Católica Boliviana La Paz Bolivia
Faculty of Education Human and Social Sciences Universidad Manuela Beltran Bogotá Colombia
Faculty of Philosophy and Arts University of Trnava 917 01 Trnava Slovakia
Faculty of Psychology Chulalongkorn University Bangkok 10330 Thailand
Graduate School of Letters Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido 060 0810 Japan
Institute for Social Research University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI 48104 USA
Institute of Psychology Czech Academy of Sciences 110 00 Nové Město Prague Czechia
Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Science Moscow 129366 Russia
Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino Rio de Janeiro 22281 100 Brazil
Office of the Chief Scientist Environmental Defense Fund New York NY 10010 USA
School and Graduate School of Humanities Kwansei Gakuin University Nishinomiya Hyogo 662 8501 Japan
School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences Peking University Beijing 100871 China
School of Psychology Curtin University Bentley WA 6102 Perth Australia
School of Psychology Dublin City University Dublin 9 Ireland
School of Psychology University of Kent Canterbury CT2 7NP UK
School of Psychology University of Santiago Santiago Estación Central Región Metropolitana Chile
School of Psychology Victoria University of Wellington Wellington 6012 New Zealand
School of Social Sciences Singapore Management University Singapore 188065 Singapore
Stress Research Institute Department of Psychology Stockholm University 106 91 Stockholm Sweden
WorkWell Research Unit North West University Potchefstroom 2520 South Africa
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Barrett HC. Towards a cognitive science of the human: cross-cultural approaches and their urgency. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2020;24:620–638. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.007. PubMed DOI
Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 2010;33:61–83. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. PubMed DOI
Rad MS, Martingano AJ, Ginges J. Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2018;115:11401–11405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721165115. PubMed DOI PMC
Daly M, Wilson M. Evolutionary social psychology and family homicide. Science. 1988;242:519–524. doi: 10.1126/science.3175672. PubMed DOI
Tooby J, Cosmides L. Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part I: theoretical considerations. Ethol. Sociobiol. 1989;10:29–49. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(89)90012-5. DOI
Kenrick DT, Keefe RC. Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in mating strategies. Behav. Brain Sci. 1992;15:75–91. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00067595. DOI
Schmitt DP. Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: a 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behav. Brain Sci. 2005;28:247–275. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000051. PubMed DOI
Schmitt DP, et al. Narcissism and the strategic pursuit of short-term mating: universal links across 11 world regions of the International Sexuality Description Project-2. Psihologijske Teme. 2017;26:89–137. doi: 10.31820/pt.26.1.5. DOI
Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R. & Nisbett, R. E. The cultural matrix of social psychology. In The Handbook of Social Psychology (eds. Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. & Lindzey G.) 915–981 (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998).
Sorokowska, A. et al. Affective interpersonal touch in close relationships: a cross-cultural perspective. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 1705–1721 (2021). PubMed
Walter KV, et al. Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: a large-scale replication. Psychol. Sci. 2020;31:408–423. doi: 10.1177/0956797620904154. PubMed DOI
Norenzayan A, Heine SJ. Psychological universals: what are they and how can we know? Psychol. Bull. 2005;131:763–784. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.763. PubMed DOI
Janicki, M. & Krebs, D.L. Evolutionary approaches to culture. In Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology: Ideas, Issues, and Applications (eds. Crawford, C. B. & Krebs, D. L.) 163-208 (Mahwah, NJ: LEA, 1998).
Neel R, Kenrick DT, White AE, Neuberg SL. Individual differences in fundamental social motives. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2016;110:887–907. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000068. PubMed DOI
Kenrick DT, Griskevicius V, Neuberg SL, Schaller M. Renovating the pyramid of needs: contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2010;5:292–314. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369469. PubMed DOI PMC
Kenrick DT, Li NP, Butner J. Dynamical evolutionary psychology: individual decision-rules and emergent social norms. Psychol. Rev. 2003;110:3–28. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.3. PubMed DOI
Becker DV, et al. More memory bang for the attentional buck: self-protection goals enhance encoding efficiency for potentially threatening males. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 2010;1:182–189. doi: 10.1177/1948550609359202. PubMed DOI PMC
Maner JK, Gailliot MT, Rouby DA, Miller SL. Can’t take my eyes off you: attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2007;93:389–401. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.389. PubMed DOI
Maner JK, et al. Functional projection: how fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2005;88:63–78. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.63. PubMed DOI
Griskevicius V, Goldstein NJ, Mortensen CR, Cialdini RB, Kenrick DT. Going along versus going alone: when fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2006;91:281–294. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.281. PubMed DOI
Li YJ, Kenrick DT, Griskevicius V, Neuberg SL. Economic decision biases and fundamental motivations: how mating and self-protection alter loss aversion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2012;102:550–561. doi: 10.1037/a0025844. PubMed DOI
Sundie JM, et al. Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2011;100:664–680. doi: 10.1037/a0021669. PubMed DOI
Griskevicius V, et al. Aggress to impress: hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2009;96:980–994. doi: 10.1037/a0013907. PubMed DOI
Griskevicius V, et al. Fear and loving in Las Vegas: evolution, emotion, and persuasion. J. Mark. Res. 2009;46:384–395. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.46.3.384. PubMed DOI PMC
Becker DV, et al. Signal detection on the battlefield: priming self-protection vs. revenge-mindedness differentially modulates the detection of enemies and allies. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023929. PubMed DOI PMC
Schaller M. The parental care motivational system and why it matters (for everyone) Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2018;27:295–30. doi: 10.1177/0963721418767873. DOI
Krems JA, Kenrick DT, Neel R. Individual perceptions of self-actualization: what functional motives are linked to fulfilling one’s full potential? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2017;43:1337–1352. doi: 10.1177/0146167217713191. PubMed DOI
Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J. Pers. Assess. 1985;49:71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. PubMed DOI
Adler NE, Epel ES, Castellazzo G, Ickovics JR. Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychol. 2000;19:586–592. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586. PubMed DOI
Pick CM, 2022. Fundamental social motives around the world. Open Science Framework. DOI
Ko A, et al. Family matters: rethinking the psychology of human social motivation. Pers. Psychol. Sci. 2020;15:173–201. doi: 10.1177/1745691619872986. PubMed DOI
Pick, C. M. et al. Family still matters: human social motivation during a global pandemic. Preprint at 10.31234/osf.io/z7mjc (2022). PubMed PMC
Virtanen P, et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods. 2020;17:261–272. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Müllner, D. Modern hierarchical, agglomerative clustering algorithms. Preprint at 10.48550/arXiv.1109.2378 (2011).
Ward JH., Jr. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1963;58:236–244. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845. DOI
Acsádi, G., Nemeskéri, J. & Balás, K. History of Human Life Span and Mortality (trans. Balás, K.) 113–135 (Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1970).
Gurven M, Kaplan H. Longevity among hunter‐gatherers: a cross‐cultural examination. Popul. Dev. Rev. 2007;33:321–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00171.x. DOI
Wang ET, Kodama G, Baldi P, Moyzis RK. Global landscape of recent inferred Darwinian selection for Homo sapiens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006;103:135–140. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509691102. PubMed DOI PMC
Gurven M, Allen-Arave W, Hill K, Hurtado AM. Reservation food sharing among the Ache of Paraguay. Hum. Nat. 2001;12:273–297. doi: 10.1007/s12110-001-1000-3. PubMed DOI
Von Rueden C, Gurven M, Kaplan H. Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proc. Royal Soc. B. 2011;278:2223–2232. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2145. PubMed DOI PMC
Geary DC. Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychol. Bull. 2000;126:55–77. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.55. PubMed DOI
Kaplan H, Hill K, Lancaster J, Hurtado AM. A theory of human life history evolution: diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evol. Anthropol. 2000;9:156–185. doi: 10.1002/1520-6505(2000)9:4<156::AID-EVAN5>3.0.CO;2-7. DOI
Burnstein E, Crandall C, Kitayama S. Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1994;67:773–789. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.773. DOI
Family still matters: Human social motivation across 42 countries during a global pandemic