The pressure reactivity index (PRx) is a parameter for the assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation, but its calculation is affected by artifacts in the source biosignals-intracranial pressure (ICP) and arterial blood pressure. We sought to describe the most common short-duration artifacts and their effect on the PRx. A retrospective analysis of 935 h of multimodal monitoring data was conducted, and five types of artifacts, characterized by their shape, duration, and amplitude, were identified: rectangular, fast impulse, isoline drift, saw tooth, and constant ICP value. Subsequently, all types of artifacts were mathematically modeled and inserted into undisturbed segments of biosignals. Fast impulse, the most common artifact, did not alter the PRx index significantly when inserted into one or both signals. Artifacts present in one signal exceeded the threshold PRx in less than 5% of samples, except for isoline drift. Compared to that, the shortest rectangular artifact inserted into both signals changed PRx to a value above the set threshold in 55.4% of cases. Our analysis shows that the effect of individual artifacts on the PRx index is variable, depending on their occurrence in one or both signals, duration, and shape. This different effect suggests that potentially not all artifacts need to be removed.

Department of Anaesthesiology Perioperative and Intensive Care Medicine Masaryk Hospital in Usti nad Labem Faculty of Health Studies J E Purkinje University in Usti nad Labem Usti nad Labem Czech Republic

Department of Biomedical Technology Faculty of Biomedical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Nam Sitna 3105 272 01 Kladno Czech Republic

Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Sorrentino E, et al. Critical thresholds for cerebrovascular reactivity after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit. Care. 2002;16:258–266. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9630-8. PubMed DOI

Beqiri E, et al. Feasibility of individualised severe traumatic brain injury management using an automated assessment of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: The COGiTATE phase II study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e030727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030727. PubMed DOI PMC

Tas J, et al. An update on the COGiTATE phase II study: Feasibility and safety of targeting an optimal cerebral perfusion pressure as a patient-tailored therapy in severe traumatic brain injury. Acta. Neurochir. Suppl. 2021;131:143–147. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_29. PubMed DOI

Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Smielewski P. Pressure reactivity index: Journey through the past 20 years. Acta Neurochir. 2017;159(11):2063–2065. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3310-1. PubMed DOI

Dias C, et al. Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure management at bedside: A single-center pilot study. Neurocrit. Care. 2015;23(1):92–102. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0103-8. PubMed DOI

Smielewski, P. et al. ICM+: Software for on-line analysis of bedside monitoring data after severe head trauma. In Intracranial Pressure and Brain Monitoring XII, 43–49 (2005). PubMed

Smielewski P, et al. ICM+, a flexible platform for investigations of cerebrospinal dynamics in clinical practice. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 2008;102:145–151. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-85578-2_30. PubMed DOI

Li Q, Mark R, Clifford G. Artificial arterial blood pressure artifact models and an evaluation of a robust blood pressure and heart rate estimator. Biomed. Eng. Online. 2009;8:13. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-8-13. PubMed DOI PMC

Son Y, et al. Automated artifact elimination of physiological signals using a deep belief network: An application for continuously measured arterial blood pressure waveforms. Inf. Sci. 2018;456:145–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.05.018. DOI

Zong W, Moody GB, Mark RG. Reduction of false arterial blood pressure alarms using signal quality assessment and relationships between the electrocardiogram and arterial blood pressure. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2004;42(5):698–706. doi: 10.1007/BF02347553. PubMed DOI

Sun JX, Reisner AT, Mark RG. A signal abnormality index for arterial blood pressure waveforms. Comput. Cardiol. 2006;33:13–16.

Zhang, P., Liu, J., Wu, X., Liu, X. & Gao, Q. A novel feature extraction method for signal quality assessment of arterial blood pressure for monitoring cerebral autoregulation. In 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, 1–4 (2010).

Pasma W, Wesselink EM, van Buuren S, de Graaff JC, van Klei WA. Artifacts annotations in anesthesia blood pressure data by man and machine. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2021;35(2):259–267. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00574-z. PubMed DOI PMC

Cao, H., Norris, P., Ozdas, A., Jenkons, J. & Morris, J. A. A simple non-physiological artifact filter for invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring: A study of 1852 trauma ICU patients. In International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1417–1420 (2006). PubMed

Lee SB, et al. Artifact removal from neurophysiological signals: Impact on intracranial and arterial pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosurg. 2019;132(6):1952–1960. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.JNS182260. PubMed DOI

Thomas E, Czosnyka M, Hutchinson P. Calculation of cerebral perfusion pressure in the management of traumatic brain injury: Joint position statement by the councils of the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland (NACCS) and the Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) Brit. J. Anaesth. 2015;115:487–488. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev233. PubMed DOI

Steiner LA, et al. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity allows determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury. Crit. Care Med. 2002;30(4):733–738. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200204000-00002. PubMed DOI

Zweifel C, et al. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in patients with head injury. Neurosurg. Focus. 2008;25:10. doi: 10.3171/FOC.2008.25.10.E2. PubMed DOI