Association between age and efficacy of combination systemic therapies in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

. 2023 Mar ; 26 (1) : 170-179. [epub] 20221025

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu metaanalýza, systematický přehled, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid36284192
Odkazy

PubMed 36284192
DOI 10.1038/s41391-022-00607-5
PII: 10.1038/s41391-022-00607-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: Combination systemic therapies have become the standard for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the effect of age on oncologic outcomes remains unknown. Our aim was to perform a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis (NMA) on the effect of chronological age on overall survival (OS) in patients treated with combination therapies for mHSPC. METHODS: We searched the PubMed®, Web of ScienceTM, and Scopus® databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyzed the efficacy of combination systemic therapies using ADT plus docetaxel and/or androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) in patients with mHSPC. We included studies, which provided separate hazard ratios (HRs) for younger vs. older patients. The selected age cut-off was 70 years (±5 years). Our outcome of interest was OS. RESULTS: We included nine RCTs with a total of 9183 patients. Younger and older men constituted 51% and 49% of included patients, respectively. Docetaxel plus ADT significantly improved OS among both older (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99, p = 0.04) and younger patients (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90, p < 0.001) with no differences according to age. ARSI plus ADT improved OS in older (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.80, p < 0.001) and younger (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.51-0.66, p < 0.001) patients; younger patients did benefit more (p = 0.02). On NMA treatment ranking, triplet therapy showed the highest probability of OS benefit irrespective of age group; in older patients, the benefit of triplet therapy compared to doublet was less expressed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mHSPC benefit from combination systemic therapies irrespective of age; the effect is, however, more evident in younger patients. Chronological age alone seems not to be a selection criteria for the administration of combination systemic therapies.

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal QC Canada

Department of Oncology and Hemato Oncology University of Milan Milan Italy

Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology University of Padua Padua Italy

Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology CHUV Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland

Department of Urology Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland

Department of Urology La Croix du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France

Department of Urology Medical University Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Okayama Japan

Department of Urology San Giovanni Battista Hospital University of Torino Torino Italy

Department of Urology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

Department of Urology St Antonius Hospital Utrecht The Netherlands

Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

Department of Urology University Hospital Essen Essen German Cancer Consortium University Hospital Essen Essen Germany

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA

Division of Nuclear Medicine European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy

Division of Surgery and Interventional Science University College London London UK

Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA

Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan

Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia

Unit of Urology Division of Oncology IRCCS San Raffaele San Raffaele Hospital Milan Italy

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Xie W, Regan MM, Buyse M, Halabi S, Kantoff PW, Sartor O, et al. Metastasis-Free Survival Is a Strong Surrogate of Overall Survival in Localized Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3097–104. PubMed DOI PMC

Institute NC. Cancer Stat Facts: Prostate Cancer.National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and EndResults Program 2022 [cited 2022]. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html .

Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79:243–62. PubMed DOI

Ng K, Smith S, Shamash J. Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC): Advances and Treatment Strategies in the First-Line Setting. Oncol Ther. 2020;8:209–30. PubMed DOI PMC

Karantanos T, Evans CP, Tombal B, Thompson TC, Montironi R, Isaacs WB. Understanding the mechanisms of androgen deprivation resistance in prostate cancer at the molecular level. Eur Urol. 2015;67:470–9. PubMed DOI

Smith MR, Hussain M, Saad F, Fizazi K, Sternberg CN, Crawford ED, et al. Darolutamide and Survival in Metastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1132–42. PubMed DOI PMC

Armstrong AJ, Azad AA, Iguchi T, Szmulewitz RZ, Petrylak DP, Holzbeierlein J, et al. Improved Survival With Enzalutamide in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:1616–22. PubMed DOI PMC

Davis ID, Martin AJ, Stockler MR, Begbie S, Chi KN, Chowdhury S, et al. Enzalutamide with Standard First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:121–31. PubMed DOI

Chi KN, Chowdhury S, Bjartell A, Chung BH, Gomes A, Given R, et al. Apalutamide in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Final Survival Analysis of the Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III TITAN Study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:2294–+. PubMed DOI

Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L, Matsubara N, Rodriguez-Antolin A, Alekseev BY, et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:686–700. PubMed DOI

James ND, De Bono JS, Spears MR, Clarke NW, Mason MD, Dearnaley DP, et al. Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:338–51. PubMed DOI PMC

Clarke NW, Ali A, Ingleby FC, Hoyle A, Amos CL, Attard G, et al. Addition of docetaxel to hormonal therapy in low- And high-burden metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer: Long-term survival results from the STAMPEDE trial. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:1992–2003. PubMed DOI PMC

Kyriakopoulos CE, Chen YH, Carducci MA, Liu G, Jarrard DF, Hahn NM, et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: long-term survival analysis of the randomized phase III E3805 chaarted trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1080–7. PubMed DOI PMC

Gravis G, Boher JM, Joly F, Soulié M, Albiges L, Priou F, et al. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Plus Docetaxel Versus ADT Alone in Metastatic Non castrate Prostate Cancer: Impact of Metastatic Burden and Long-term Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase 3 GETUG-AFU15 Trial. Eur Urol. 2016;70:256–62. PubMed DOI

Sathianathen NJ, Koschel S, Thangasamy IA, Teh J, Alghazo O, Butcher G, et al. Indirect Comparisons of Efficacy between Combination Approaches in Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;77:365–72. PubMed DOI

Fizazi K, Foulon S, Carles J, Roubaud G, McDermott R, Fléchon A, et al. Abiraterone plus prednisone added to androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel in de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PEACE-1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Lancet. 2022;399:1695–707. PubMed DOI

Walz J, Gallina A, Perrotte P, Jeldres C, Trinh QD, Hutterer GC, et al. Clinicians are poor raters of life-expectancy before radical prostatectomy or definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2007;100:1254–8. PubMed DOI

Walz J, Gallina A, Saad F, Montorsi F, Perrotte P, Shariat SF, et al. A nomogram predicting 10-year life expectancy in candidates for radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3576–81. PubMed DOI

Lage DE, Michaelson MD, Lee RJ, Greer JA, Temel JS, Sweeney CJ. Outcomes of older men receiving docetaxel for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021;24:1181–8. PubMed DOI PMC

Graff JN, Baciarello G, Armstrong AJ, Higano CS, Iversen P, Flaig TW, et al. Efficacy and safety of enzalutamide in patients 75 years or older with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from PREVAIL. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:286–94. PubMed DOI

Feng Z, Graff JN. Next-Generation Androgen Receptor-Signaling Inhibitors for Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Older Patients. Drugs Aging. 2021;38:111–23. PubMed DOI

Boyle HJ, Alibhai S, Decoster L, Efstathiou E, Fizazi K, Mottet N, et al. Updated recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology on prostate cancer management in older patients. Eur J Cancer. 2019;116:116–36. PubMed DOI

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. PubMed DOI

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100. Epub 2009/07/22. PubMed PMID: 19621070 PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2707010 Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals Trust on behalf of the Department of Health and the National Institute for Health Research in England. This is a fixed term contract, the renewal of which is dependent upon the value placed upon his work, that of the UK Cochrane Centre, and of The Cochrane Collaboration more widely by the Department of Health. His work involves the conduct of systematic reviews and the support of the conduct and use of systematic reviews. Therefore, work–such as this manuscript–relating to systematic reviews might have an impact on his employment.

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2011;343:d5928. Epub 2011/10/20. 10.1136/bmj.d5928. PubMed PMID: 22008217; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3196245 www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare support from the Cochrane Collaboration for the development and evaluation of the tool described; they have no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Shim SR, Kim SJ, Lee J, Rücker G. Network meta-analysis: application and practice using R software. Epidemiol Health. 2019;41:e2019013. PubMed DOI PMC

van Valkenhoef G, Lu G, de Brock B, Hillege H, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Automating network meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3:285–99. PubMed DOI

Woods BS, Hawkins N, Scott DA. Network meta-analysis on the log-hazard scale, combining count and hazard ratio statistics accounting for multi-arm trials: a tutorial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:54. PubMed DOI PMC

Sathianathen NJ, Koschel S, Thangasamy IA, Teh J, Alghazo O, Butcher G, et al. Indirect Comparisons of Efficacy between Combination Approaches in Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;77:365–72. PubMed DOI

Rajwa P, Pradere B, Gandaglia G, van den Bergh RCN, Tsaur I, Shim SR, et al. Intensification of Systemic Therapy in Addition to Definitive Local Treatment in Nonmetastatic Unfavourable Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2022.

Shevach JW, Weiner AB, Kasimer RN, Miller CH, Morgans AK. Risk Assessment and Considerations for Proper Management of Elderly Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020;3:400–9. PubMed DOI

Shayegan B, Wallis CJD, Hamilton RJ, Morgan SC, Cagiannos I, Basappa NS, et al. Real-world utilization and outcomes of docetaxel among older men with metastatic prostate cancer: a retrospective population-based cohort study in Canada. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022. Epub 2022/02/25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00514-9 . PubMed PMID: 35197558.

Lackman M, Vickers MM, Hsu T. Physician-reported reasons for non-enrollment of older adults in cancer clinical trials. J Geriatr Oncol. 2020;11:31–6. PubMed DOI

Bellera CA, Rainfray M, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Mertens C, Delva F, Fonck M, et al. Screening older cancer patients: first evaluation of the G-8 geriatric screening tool. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2166–72. PubMed DOI

Berry SD, Ngo L, Samelson EJ, Kiel DP. Competing risk of death: an important consideration in studies of older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:783–7. PubMed DOI PMC

Fallah J, Zhang L, Amatya A, Gong Y, King-Kallimanis B, Bhatnagar V, et al. Survival outcomes in older men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor inhibitors: a US Food and Drug Administration pooled analysis of patient-level data from three randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:1230–9. PubMed DOI

Saad F, Efstathiou E, Attard G, Flaig TW, Franke F, Goodman OB Jr., et al. Apalutamide plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus placebo plus abiraterone and prednisone in metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (ACIS): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multinational, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:1541–59. PubMed DOI PMC

Smith MR, Rathkopf DE, Mulders PF, Carles J, Van Poppel H, Li J, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Abiraterone Acetate in Elderly (75 Years or Older) Chemotherapy Naïve Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2015;194:1277–84. PubMed DOI PMC

Siemens DR, Klotz L, Heidenreich A, Chowdhury S, Villers A, Baron B, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Enzalutamide vs Bicalutamide in Younger and Older Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer in the TERRAIN Trial. J Urol. 2018;199:147–54. PubMed DOI

Van Herck Y, Feyaerts A, Alibhai S, Papamichael D, Decoster L, Lambrechts Y, et al. Is cancer biology different in older patients. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021;2:e663–e77. PubMed DOI

Devos G, Devlies W, De Meerleer G, Baldewijns M, Gevaert T, Moris L, et al. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2021;18:739–62. PubMed DOI

Agarwal N, Tangen CM, Hussain MHA, Gupta S, Plets M, Lara PN, et al. Orteronel for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Trial (SWOG-1216). J Clin Oncol. 2022:JCO2102517. Epub 2022/04/22. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02517 . PubMed PMID: 35446628.

Shim SR, Kim SJ. Intervention meta-analysis: application and practice using R software. Epidemiol Health. 2019;41:e2019008. PubMed DOI PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...