Association between age and efficacy of combination systemic therapies in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu metaanalýza, systematický přehled, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
36284192
DOI
10.1038/s41391-022-00607-5
PII: 10.1038/s41391-022-00607-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antagonisté androgenů terapeutické užití MeSH
- docetaxel MeSH
- hormony terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory prostaty * patologie MeSH
- protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie terapeutické užití MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antagonisté androgenů MeSH
- docetaxel MeSH
- hormony MeSH
BACKGROUND: Combination systemic therapies have become the standard for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the effect of age on oncologic outcomes remains unknown. Our aim was to perform a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis (NMA) on the effect of chronological age on overall survival (OS) in patients treated with combination therapies for mHSPC. METHODS: We searched the PubMed®, Web of ScienceTM, and Scopus® databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyzed the efficacy of combination systemic therapies using ADT plus docetaxel and/or androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) in patients with mHSPC. We included studies, which provided separate hazard ratios (HRs) for younger vs. older patients. The selected age cut-off was 70 years (±5 years). Our outcome of interest was OS. RESULTS: We included nine RCTs with a total of 9183 patients. Younger and older men constituted 51% and 49% of included patients, respectively. Docetaxel plus ADT significantly improved OS among both older (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99, p = 0.04) and younger patients (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90, p < 0.001) with no differences according to age. ARSI plus ADT improved OS in older (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.80, p < 0.001) and younger (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.51-0.66, p < 0.001) patients; younger patients did benefit more (p = 0.02). On NMA treatment ranking, triplet therapy showed the highest probability of OS benefit irrespective of age group; in older patients, the benefit of triplet therapy compared to doublet was less expressed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mHSPC benefit from combination systemic therapies irrespective of age; the effect is, however, more evident in younger patients. Chronological age alone seems not to be a selection criteria for the administration of combination systemic therapies.
Department of Oncology and Hemato Oncology University of Milan Milan Italy
Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology University of Padua Padua Italy
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology CHUV Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
Department of Urology Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland
Department of Urology La Croix du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France
Department of Urology Medical University Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland
Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology San Giovanni Battista Hospital University of Torino Torino Italy
Department of Urology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Department of Urology St Antonius Hospital Utrecht The Netherlands
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Division of Nuclear Medicine European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy
Division of Surgery and Interventional Science University College London London UK
Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
Unit of Urology Division of Oncology IRCCS San Raffaele San Raffaele Hospital Milan Italy
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Xie W, Regan MM, Buyse M, Halabi S, Kantoff PW, Sartor O, et al. Metastasis-Free Survival Is a Strong Surrogate of Overall Survival in Localized Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3097–104. PubMed DOI PMC
Institute NC. Cancer Stat Facts: Prostate Cancer.National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and EndResults Program 2022 [cited 2022]. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html .
Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79:243–62. PubMed DOI
Ng K, Smith S, Shamash J. Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC): Advances and Treatment Strategies in the First-Line Setting. Oncol Ther. 2020;8:209–30. PubMed DOI PMC
Karantanos T, Evans CP, Tombal B, Thompson TC, Montironi R, Isaacs WB. Understanding the mechanisms of androgen deprivation resistance in prostate cancer at the molecular level. Eur Urol. 2015;67:470–9. PubMed DOI
Smith MR, Hussain M, Saad F, Fizazi K, Sternberg CN, Crawford ED, et al. Darolutamide and Survival in Metastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1132–42. PubMed DOI PMC
Armstrong AJ, Azad AA, Iguchi T, Szmulewitz RZ, Petrylak DP, Holzbeierlein J, et al. Improved Survival With Enzalutamide in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:1616–22. PubMed DOI PMC
Davis ID, Martin AJ, Stockler MR, Begbie S, Chi KN, Chowdhury S, et al. Enzalutamide with Standard First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:121–31. PubMed DOI
Chi KN, Chowdhury S, Bjartell A, Chung BH, Gomes A, Given R, et al. Apalutamide in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Final Survival Analysis of the Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III TITAN Study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:2294–+. PubMed DOI
Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L, Matsubara N, Rodriguez-Antolin A, Alekseev BY, et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:686–700. PubMed DOI
James ND, De Bono JS, Spears MR, Clarke NW, Mason MD, Dearnaley DP, et al. Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:338–51. PubMed DOI PMC
Clarke NW, Ali A, Ingleby FC, Hoyle A, Amos CL, Attard G, et al. Addition of docetaxel to hormonal therapy in low- And high-burden metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer: Long-term survival results from the STAMPEDE trial. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:1992–2003. PubMed DOI PMC
Kyriakopoulos CE, Chen YH, Carducci MA, Liu G, Jarrard DF, Hahn NM, et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: long-term survival analysis of the randomized phase III E3805 chaarted trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1080–7. PubMed DOI PMC
Gravis G, Boher JM, Joly F, Soulié M, Albiges L, Priou F, et al. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Plus Docetaxel Versus ADT Alone in Metastatic Non castrate Prostate Cancer: Impact of Metastatic Burden and Long-term Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase 3 GETUG-AFU15 Trial. Eur Urol. 2016;70:256–62. PubMed DOI
Sathianathen NJ, Koschel S, Thangasamy IA, Teh J, Alghazo O, Butcher G, et al. Indirect Comparisons of Efficacy between Combination Approaches in Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;77:365–72. PubMed DOI
Fizazi K, Foulon S, Carles J, Roubaud G, McDermott R, Fléchon A, et al. Abiraterone plus prednisone added to androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel in de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PEACE-1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Lancet. 2022;399:1695–707. PubMed DOI
Walz J, Gallina A, Perrotte P, Jeldres C, Trinh QD, Hutterer GC, et al. Clinicians are poor raters of life-expectancy before radical prostatectomy or definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2007;100:1254–8. PubMed DOI
Walz J, Gallina A, Saad F, Montorsi F, Perrotte P, Shariat SF, et al. A nomogram predicting 10-year life expectancy in candidates for radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3576–81. PubMed DOI
Lage DE, Michaelson MD, Lee RJ, Greer JA, Temel JS, Sweeney CJ. Outcomes of older men receiving docetaxel for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021;24:1181–8. PubMed DOI PMC
Graff JN, Baciarello G, Armstrong AJ, Higano CS, Iversen P, Flaig TW, et al. Efficacy and safety of enzalutamide in patients 75 years or older with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from PREVAIL. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:286–94. PubMed DOI
Feng Z, Graff JN. Next-Generation Androgen Receptor-Signaling Inhibitors for Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Older Patients. Drugs Aging. 2021;38:111–23. PubMed DOI
Boyle HJ, Alibhai S, Decoster L, Efstathiou E, Fizazi K, Mottet N, et al. Updated recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology on prostate cancer management in older patients. Eur J Cancer. 2019;116:116–36. PubMed DOI
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. PubMed DOI
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100. Epub 2009/07/22. PubMed PMID: 19621070 PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2707010 Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals Trust on behalf of the Department of Health and the National Institute for Health Research in England. This is a fixed term contract, the renewal of which is dependent upon the value placed upon his work, that of the UK Cochrane Centre, and of The Cochrane Collaboration more widely by the Department of Health. His work involves the conduct of systematic reviews and the support of the conduct and use of systematic reviews. Therefore, work–such as this manuscript–relating to systematic reviews might have an impact on his employment.
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2011;343:d5928. Epub 2011/10/20. 10.1136/bmj.d5928. PubMed PMID: 22008217; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3196245 www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare support from the Cochrane Collaboration for the development and evaluation of the tool described; they have no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Shim SR, Kim SJ, Lee J, Rücker G. Network meta-analysis: application and practice using R software. Epidemiol Health. 2019;41:e2019013. PubMed DOI PMC
van Valkenhoef G, Lu G, de Brock B, Hillege H, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Automating network meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3:285–99. PubMed DOI
Woods BS, Hawkins N, Scott DA. Network meta-analysis on the log-hazard scale, combining count and hazard ratio statistics accounting for multi-arm trials: a tutorial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:54. PubMed DOI PMC
Sathianathen NJ, Koschel S, Thangasamy IA, Teh J, Alghazo O, Butcher G, et al. Indirect Comparisons of Efficacy between Combination Approaches in Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;77:365–72. PubMed DOI
Rajwa P, Pradere B, Gandaglia G, van den Bergh RCN, Tsaur I, Shim SR, et al. Intensification of Systemic Therapy in Addition to Definitive Local Treatment in Nonmetastatic Unfavourable Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2022.
Shevach JW, Weiner AB, Kasimer RN, Miller CH, Morgans AK. Risk Assessment and Considerations for Proper Management of Elderly Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020;3:400–9. PubMed DOI
Shayegan B, Wallis CJD, Hamilton RJ, Morgan SC, Cagiannos I, Basappa NS, et al. Real-world utilization and outcomes of docetaxel among older men with metastatic prostate cancer: a retrospective population-based cohort study in Canada. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022. Epub 2022/02/25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00514-9 . PubMed PMID: 35197558.
Lackman M, Vickers MM, Hsu T. Physician-reported reasons for non-enrollment of older adults in cancer clinical trials. J Geriatr Oncol. 2020;11:31–6. PubMed DOI
Bellera CA, Rainfray M, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Mertens C, Delva F, Fonck M, et al. Screening older cancer patients: first evaluation of the G-8 geriatric screening tool. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2166–72. PubMed DOI
Berry SD, Ngo L, Samelson EJ, Kiel DP. Competing risk of death: an important consideration in studies of older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:783–7. PubMed DOI PMC
Fallah J, Zhang L, Amatya A, Gong Y, King-Kallimanis B, Bhatnagar V, et al. Survival outcomes in older men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor inhibitors: a US Food and Drug Administration pooled analysis of patient-level data from three randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:1230–9. PubMed DOI
Saad F, Efstathiou E, Attard G, Flaig TW, Franke F, Goodman OB Jr., et al. Apalutamide plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus placebo plus abiraterone and prednisone in metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (ACIS): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multinational, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:1541–59. PubMed DOI PMC
Smith MR, Rathkopf DE, Mulders PF, Carles J, Van Poppel H, Li J, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Abiraterone Acetate in Elderly (75 Years or Older) Chemotherapy Naïve Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2015;194:1277–84. PubMed DOI PMC
Siemens DR, Klotz L, Heidenreich A, Chowdhury S, Villers A, Baron B, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Enzalutamide vs Bicalutamide in Younger and Older Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer in the TERRAIN Trial. J Urol. 2018;199:147–54. PubMed DOI
Van Herck Y, Feyaerts A, Alibhai S, Papamichael D, Decoster L, Lambrechts Y, et al. Is cancer biology different in older patients. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021;2:e663–e77. PubMed DOI
Devos G, Devlies W, De Meerleer G, Baldewijns M, Gevaert T, Moris L, et al. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2021;18:739–62. PubMed DOI
Agarwal N, Tangen CM, Hussain MHA, Gupta S, Plets M, Lara PN, et al. Orteronel for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Trial (SWOG-1216). J Clin Oncol. 2022:JCO2102517. Epub 2022/04/22. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02517 . PubMed PMID: 35446628.
Shim SR, Kim SJ. Intervention meta-analysis: application and practice using R software. Epidemiol Health. 2019;41:e2019008. PubMed DOI PMC