Preclinical evaluation of semi-automated laser ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A comparative study
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
Cardiofocus Inc
PubMed
36511472
DOI
10.1111/jce.15777
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- atrial fibrillation, automated, catheter ablation, endoscopic, laser balloon,
- MeSH
- fibrilace síní * diagnóza chirurgie MeSH
- katetrizační ablace * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- laserová terapie * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- prasata MeSH
- venae pulmonales * chirurgie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Visually-guided laser balloon ablation (VGLA) currently requires careful manual rotation of the laser to create overlapping lesions. A novel semi-automated VGLA may reduce ablation times and lesion gaps. We aimed to compare semi-automated (SA) VGLA to that of manual (MN) VGLA. METHODS: Acute: Nine swine underwent right superior pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using either SA (n = 3, 13-18 W), MN (n = 3, 8.5-12 W), or radiofrequency (RF, n = 3, 25-40 W) and were killed acutely. Chronic: 16 swine, underwent PVI using either SA (n = 8, 15 W) or MN (n = 8, 10 W), and were survived for 1 month before being killed. All hearts were then submitted for pathological evaluation. RESULTS: Acute: PVI was successful in all 9/9 swine with lesion counts significantly lower in the SA arm (5.3 ± 5.9, 33.7 ± 10.0, and 28.0 ± 4.4 in SA, MN, and RF arms; p = .007 for SA and MN). At necropsy, circumferentiality and transmurality were 98% and 94% in SA, 98% and 80% in MN, and 100% and 100% in RF arms. A single steam pop was noted on sectioning in the SA arm swine and occurred in the high dose (18 W) strategy. Chronic: PVI was acutely successful in 16/16 swine with no difference in PVI durability rates (62.5% vs. 75.0%), lesion transmurality (95.8 ± 17.4% vs.91.9 ± 25.9%), and circumferentiality (95.8 ± 6.6% vs. 94.8 ± 6.3%) between SA and MN arms. Catheter use time and lesion counts were lower in the SA arm compared to the MN arm (11.5 ± 12.7 vs. 21.8 ± 3.8 min, p = .046 and 4.8 ± 3.83 vs. 35.4 ± 4.4, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Motor-assisted semi-automated laser balloon ablation can improve upon procedural efficiency by reducing ablation time.
CardioFocus Inc Marlborough Massachusetts USA
Department of Cardiology Hospital Na Homolce Prague Czech Republic
Helmsley Electrophysiology Center Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Natale A, Reddy VY, Monir G, et al. Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:647-656.
Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of the safety and effectiveness of a contact force-sensing irrigated catheter for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of the TactiCath Contact Force Ablation Catheter Study for Atrial Fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) study. Circulation. 2015;132:907-915.
Packer DL, Kowal RC, Wheelan KR, et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1713-1723.
Sohara H, Ohe T, Okumura K, et al. HotBalloon ablation of the pulmonary veins for paroxysmal AF. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:2747-2757.
Dukkipati SR, Cuoco F, Kutinsky I, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using the visually guided laser balloon. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1350-1360.
Reddy VY, Neuzil P, Themistoclakis S, et al. Visually-guided balloon catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: experimental feasibility and first-in-human multicenter clinical outcome. Circulation. 2009;120:12-20.
Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Skoda J, et al. Visual balloon-guided point-by-point ablation: reliable, reproducible, and persistent pulmonary vein isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3:266-273.
Koruth JS, Iwasawa J, Enomoto Y, et al. Chamber-specific radiofrequency lesion dimension estimation using novel catheter-based tissue interface temperature sensing. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3:1092-1102.
Gerstenfeld EP, Michele J. Pulmonary vein isolation using a compliant endoscopic laser balloon ablation system in a swine model. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010;29:1-9.
Koruth JS, Schneider C, Avitall B, et al. Pre-clinical investigation of a low-intensity collimated ultrasound system for pulmonary vein isolation in a porcine model. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;1:306-314.
Yokokawa M, Bhandari AK, Tada H, et al. Comparison of the point-by-point versus catheter dragging technique for curative radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:15-22.
Neužil P, Schmidt B, Chun J, et al. Performance of a 3rd Generation Visually Guided Laser Balloon Catheter for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Results of the X3Study. Heart Rhythm Society's (HRS) 40th Annual Scientific Sessions. 2019.
Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, et al. High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4:467-479.
Bhaskaran A, Chik W, Pouliopoulos J, et al. Five seconds of 50-60 W radio frequency atrial ablations were transmural and safe: an in vitro mechanistic assessment and force-controlled in vivo validation. Europace. 2017;19:874-880.