Building a synthesis of economic costs of biological invasions in New Zealand
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
35990909
PubMed Central
PMC9387519
DOI
10.7717/peerj.13580
PII: 13580
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Biosecurity, Eradication, InvaCost, Invasive alien species, Island, Monetary impacts, Resource damages and losses, Socioeconomic sectors,
- MeSH
- ekosystém * MeSH
- rostliny MeSH
- výdaje na zdravotnictví MeSH
- zavlečené druhy * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Nový Zéland MeSH
Biological invasions are a major component of anthropogenic environmental change, incurring substantial economic costs across all sectors of society and ecosystems. There have been recent syntheses of costs for a number of countries using the newly compiled InvaCost database, but New Zealand-a country renowned for its approach to invasive species management-has so far not been examined. Here we analyse reported economic damage and management costs incurred by biological invasions in New Zealand from 1968 to 2020. In total, US$69 billion (NZ$97 billion) is currently reported over this ∼50-year period, with approximately US$9 billion of this considered highly reliable, observed (c.f. projected) costs. Most (82%) of these observed economic costs are associated with damage, with comparatively little invested in management (18%). Reported costs are increasing over time, with damage averaging US$120 million per year and exceeding management expenditure in all decades. Where specified, most reported costs are from terrestrial plants and animals, with damages principally borne by primary industries such as agriculture and forestry. Management costs are more often associated with interventions by authorities and stakeholders. Relative to other countries present in the InvaCost database, New Zealand was found to spend considerably more than expected from its Gross Domestic Product on pre- and post-invasion management costs. However, some known ecologically (c.f. economically) impactful invasive species are notably absent from estimated damage costs, and management costs are not reported for a number of game animals and agricultural pathogens. Given these gaps for known and potentially damaging invaders, we urge improved cost reporting at the national scale, including improving public accessibility through increased access and digitisation of records, particularly in overlooked socioeconomic sectors and habitats. This also further highlights the importance of investment in management to curtail future damages across all sectors.
CNRS AgroParisTech Ecologie Systématique Evolution Université Paris Saclay Orsay France
GEOMAR Helmholtz Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel Kiel Germany
School of Biological Sciences The Queen's University Belfast Belfast United Kingdom
School of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen United Kingdom
School of Biological Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ahmed DA, Hudgins EJ, Cuthbert RN, Kourantidou M, Diagne C, Haubrock PJ, Leung B, Liu C, Leroy B, Petrovskii S, Beidas A, Courchamp F. Managing biological invasions: the cost of inaction. Biological Invasions. 2022;24(7):1927–1946. doi: 10.1007/s10530-022-02755-0. DOI
Allen RB, Lee WG. Biological invasions in New Zealand. Springer Science+Business Media; Berlin: 2006.
Angulo E, Diagne C, Ballesteros-Mejia L, Adamjy T, Ahmed DA, Akulov E, Banerjee AK, Capinha C, Dia CAKM, Dobigny G, Duboscq-Carra VG, Golivets M, Haubrock PJ, Heringer G, Kirichenko N, Kourantidou M, Liu C, Nuñez MA, Renault D, Roiz D, Taheri A, Verbrugge LNH, Watari Y, Xiong W, Courchamp F. Non-English languages enrich scientific knowledge: the example of economic costs of biological invasions. Science of the Total Environment. 2021;775:144441. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144441. PubMed DOI
Anton A, Geraldi NR, Ricciardi A, Dick JTA. Global determinants of prey naivete to exotic predators. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2020;2871928:20192978. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2978. PubMed DOI PMC
Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Essl F, Genovesi P, Heikkilä J, Jeschke JM, Jones G, Keller R, Kenis M, Kueffer C, Martinou AF, Nentwig W, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Richardson DM, Roy HE, Saul W-C, Scalera R, Vilà M, Wilson JRU, Kumschick S. Socio-economic impact classification of alien taxa (SEICAT) Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2018;9(1):159–168. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12844. DOI
Barlow ND, Goldson S. Alien invertebrates in New Zealand. In: Pimentel D, editor. Biological invasions: economic and environmental costs of alien, plan, animal and microbe species. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2011. pp. 195–216.
Bell EA, Bell BD, Merton DV. The legacy of Big South Cape: rat irruption to rat eradication. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 2016;40(2):212–218. doi: 10.20417/nzjecol.40.24. DOI
Bellard C, Genovesi P, Jeschke J. Global patterns in threats to vertebrates by biological invasions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2016;2831823:20152454. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2454. PubMed DOI PMC
Bellard C, Rysman J-F, Leroy B, Claud C, Mace GM. A global picture of biological invasion threat on islands. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2017;1(12):1862–1869. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0365-6. PubMed DOI
Bellingham PJ, Towns DR, Cameron EK, Davis JJ, Wardle DA, Wilmshurst JM, Mulder CP. New Zealand island restoration: seabirds, predators, and the importance of history. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 2010;34(1):115.
Bomford M, O’Brien P. Eradication of Australia’s vertebrate pests: a feasibility study. Conservation Through Sustainable Use of Wildlife. 1995;23(2):249–255.
Bradshaw CJA, Hoskins AJ, Haubrock PJ, Cuthbert RN, Diagne C, Leroy B, Andrews L, Page B, Cassey P, Sheppard AW, Courchamp F. Detailed assessment of the reported economic costs of invasive species in Australia. NeoBiota. 2021;67:511–550. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.67.58834. DOI
Bradshaw CJA, Leroy B, Bellard C, Roiz D, Albert C, Fournier A, Barbet-Massin M, Salles J-M, Simard F, Courchamp F. Massive yet grossly underestimated global costs of invasive insects. Nature Communications. 2016;7(1):12986. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12986. PubMed DOI PMC
Brandt AJ, Bellingham PJ, Duncan RP, Etherington TR, Fridley JD, Howell CJ, Hulme PE, Jo I, McGlone MS, Richardson SJ, Sullivan JJ, Williams PA, Peltzer DA. Naturalised plants transform the composition and function of the New Zealand flora. Biological invasions. 2021;23(2):351–366. doi: 10.1007/s10530-020-02393-4. DOI
Brenton-Rule E, Frankel S, Lester P. Improving management of invasive species: New Zealand’s approach to pre- and post-border pests. Policy Quarterly. 2016;12(1):9. doi: 10.26686/pq.v12i1.4582. DOI
Brockerhoff EG, Liebhold AM, Richardson B, Suckling DM. Eradication of invasive forest insects: concepts, methods, costs and benefits. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science. 2010;40(suppl):S117–S135.
Carter ZT, Lumley T, Bodey TW, Russell JC. The clock is ticking: temporally prioritizing eradications on islands. Global Change Biology. 2021;27(7):1443–1456. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15502. PubMed DOI
Clout M. Ecological and economic costs of alien vertebrates in New Zealand. In: Pimentel D, editor. Biological invasions: economic and environmental costs of alien, plant, animal, and microbe species. 2nd ed CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2011. pp. 283–291.
Collier-Robinson L, Rayne A, Rupene M, Thoms C, Steeves T. Embedding indigenous principles in genomic research of culturally significant species: a conservation genomics case study. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 2019;43(3):1–9.
Courchamp F, Chapuis J-L, Pascal M. Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact. Biological Reviews. 2003;78(3):347–383. PubMed
Crystal-Ornelas R, Hudgins EJ, Cuthbert RN, Haubrock PJ, Fantle-Lepczyk J, Angulo E, Kramer AM, Ballesteros-Mejia L, Leroy B, Leung B, López-López E, Diagne C, Courchamp F. Economic costs of biological invasions within North America. NeoBiota. 2021;67:485–510. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.67.58038. DOI
Crystal-Ornelas R, Lockwood JL. The ‘known unknowns’ of invasive species impact measurement. Biological Invasions. 2020;22(4):1513–1525. doi: 10.1007/s10530-020-02200-0. DOI
Cuthbert RN, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Briski E, Diagne C, Dick JTA, Essl F, Genovesi P, Haubrock PJ, Latombe G, Lenzner B, Meinard Y, Pauchard A, Pyšek P, Ricciardi A, Richardson DM, Russell JC, Simberloff D, Courchamp F. Invasion costs, impacts, and human agency: response to Sagoff 2020. Conservation Biology. 2020;34(6):1579–1582. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13592. PubMed DOI
Cuthbert RN, Diagne C, Haubrock PJ, Turbelin AJ, Courchamp F. Are the 100 of the world’s worst invasive species also the costliest? Biological Invasions. 2021a;24(7):1895–1904. doi: 10.1007/s10530-021-02568-7. DOI
Cuthbert RN, Diagne C, Hudgins EJ, Turbelin A, Ahmed DA, Albert C, Bodey TW, Briski E, Essl F, Haubrock PJ, Gozlan RE, Kirichenko N, Kourantidou M, Kramer AM, Courchamp F. Biological invasion costs reveal insufficient proactive management worldwide. Science of the Total Environment. 2022;819:153404. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153404. PubMed DOI
Cuthbert RN, Pattison Z, Taylor NG, Verbrugge L, Diagne C, Ahmed DA, Leroy B, Angulo E, Briski E, Capinha C, Catford JA, Dalu T, Essl F, Gozlan RE, Haubrock PJ, Kourantidou M, Kramer AM, Renault D, Wasserman RJ, Courchamp F. Global economic costs of aquatic invasive alien species. Science of the Total Environment. 2021b;775:145238. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145238. PubMed DOI
Dasgupta P. The economics of biodiversity: the Dasgupta review. HM Treasury; London: 2021.
Department of Conservation . Towards a predator free New Zealand: Predator Free 2050 strategy. New Zealand Government; Wellington: 2020.
Department of Conservation . Technical feasibility study report for eradication of pigs, mice and cats from Auckland Island. Invercargill; New Zealand: 2021.
Diagne C, Leroy B, Gozlan RE, Vaissière AC, Assailly C, Nuninger L, Roiz D, Jourdain F, Jarić I, Courchamp F. InvaCost, a public database of the economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Scientific Data. 2020;7(1):277. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00586-z. PubMed DOI PMC
de Wit LA, Zilliacus KM, Quadri P, Will D, Grima N, Spatz D, Holmes N, Tershy B, Howald GR, Croll DA. Invasive vertebrate eradications on islands as a tool for implementing global Sustainable Development Goals. Environmental Conservation. 2020;47(3):139–148. doi: 10.1017/S0376892920000211. DOI
Diagne C, Turbelin AJ, Moodley D, Novoa A, Leroy B, Angulo E, Adamjy T, Dia CAKM, Taheri A, Tambo J, Dobigny G, Courchamp F. The economic costs of biological invasions in Africa: a growing but neglected threat? NeoBiota. 2021b;67:11–51. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.67.59132. DOI
Diagne C, Leroy B, Vaissière A-C, Gozlan RE, Roiz D, Jarić I, Salles J-M, Bradshaw CJA, Courchamp F. High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature. 2021a;5927855:571–576. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6. PubMed DOI
Dick JTA, Laverty C, Lennon JJ, Barrios-O’Neill D, Mensink PJ, Britton JRobert, Médoc V, Boets P, Alexander ME, Taylor NG, Dunn AM, Hatcher MJ, Rosewarne PJ, Crookes S, MacIsaac HJ, Xu M, Ricciardi A, Wasserman RJ, Ellender BR, Weyl OLF, Lucy FE, Banks PB, Dodd JA, MacNeil C, Penk MR, Aldridge DC, Caffrey JM. Invader Relative Impact Potential: a new metric to understand and predict the ecological impacts of existing, emerging and future invasive alien species. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2017;54(4):1259–1267. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12849. DOI
Early R, Bradley BA, Dukes JS, Lawler JJ, Olden JD, Blumenthal DM, Gonzalez P, Grosholz ED, Ibañez I, Miller LP, Sorte CJB, Tatem AJ. Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nature Communications. 2016;7(1):12485. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12485. PubMed DOI PMC
Essl F, Lenzner B, Bacher S, Bailey S, Capinha C, Daehler C, Dullinger S, Genovesi P, Hui C, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Katsanevakis S, Kuhn I, Leung B, Liebhold A, Liu C, MacIsaac HJ, Meyerson LA, Nunez MA, Pauchard A, Pysek P, Rabitsch W, Richardson DM, Roy HE, Ruiz GM, Russell JC, Sanders NJ, Sax DF, Scalera R, Seebens H, Springborn M, Turbelin A, van Kleunen M, Holle Bvon, Winter M, Zenni RD, Mattsson BJ, Roura-Pascual N. Drivers of future alien species impacts: an expert-based assessment. Global Change Biology. 2020;26(9):4880–4893. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15199. PubMed DOI PMC
Ferguson CM, Barratt BIP, Bell N, Goldson SL, Hardwick S, Jackson M, Jackson TA, Phillips CB, Popay AJ, Rennie G, Sinclair S, Townsend R, Wilson M. Quantifying the economic cost of invertebrate pests to New Zealand’s pastoral industry. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 2019;62(3):255–315. doi: 10.1080/00288233.2018.1478860. DOI
Fournier A, Penone C, Pennino MG, Courchamp F. Predicting future invaders and future invasions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019;116(16):7905–7910. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803456116. PubMed DOI PMC
Goldson S, Bourdôt G, Brockerhoff E, Byrom A, Clout M, McGlone M, Nelson W, Popay A, Suckling D, Templeton M. New Zealand pest management: current and future challenges. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 2015;45(1):31–58. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2014.1000343. DOI
Gross A, Holdenrieder O, Pautasso M, Queloz V, Sieber TN. Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus, the causal agent of European ash dieback. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2014;15(1):5–21. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12073. PubMed DOI PMC
Hackwell K, Bertram G. Pests & weeds: the cost of restoring an indigenous dawn chorus: a blueprint for action against the impacts of introduced pest organisms on the New Zealand environment. Wellington: New Zealand Conservation Authority; 1999. (71 pages)
Hanley N, Roberts M. The economic benefits of invasive species management. People and Nature. 2019;1(2):124–137. doi: 10.1002/pan3.31. DOI
Haubrock PJ, Turbelin AJ, Cuthbert RN, Novoa A, Taylor NG, Angulo E, Ballesteros-Mejia L, Bodey TW, Capinha C, Diagne C, Essl F, Golivets M, Kirichenko N, Kourantidou M, Leroy B, Renault D, Verbrugge L, Courchamp F. Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe. NeoBiota. 2021;67:153–190. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.67.58196. DOI
Hayden BJ, Whyte CF. Invasive species management in New Zealand. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT, editors. Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press; Washington, DC: 2003. pp. 270–291.
Hoffmann BD, Broadhurst LM. The economic cost of managing invasive species in Australia. NeoBiota. 2016;31:1–18. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.31.6960. DOI
Holmes TP, Aukema JE, Von Holle B, Liebhold A, Sills E. Economic impacts of invasive species in forests. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009;1162(1):18–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04446.x. PubMed DOI
Hughey KF, Hickling GJ. Ecologically based policy evaluation: application to ungulate management in New Zealand. environmental science & policy. 2006;9(7-8):639–651. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.07.001. DOI
Hulme PE. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2009;46(1):10–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01600.x. DOI
Hulme PE. Invasive species challenge the global response to emerging diseases. Trends in Parasitology. 2014;30(6):267–270. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.03.005. PubMed DOI
Hulme PE. Plant invasions in New Zealand: global lessons in prevention, eradication and control. Biological invasions. 2020;22(5):1539–1562. doi: 10.1007/s10530-020-02224-6. DOI
Jay M, Morad M, Bell A. Biosecurity, a policy dilemma for New Zealand. Land Use Policy. 2003;20(2):121–129. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00008-5. DOI
Kettunen M, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, Pagad S, Starfinger U, Brink Pten, Shine C. Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS) Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP); Brussels: 2009.
Lane HS, Webb SC, Duncan J. Bonamia ostreae in the New Zealand oyster Ostrea chilensis: a new host and geographic record for this haplosporidian parasite. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 2016;118(1):55–63. doi: 10.3354/dao02960. PubMed DOI
Leroy B, Kramer AM, Vaissière A-C, Courchamp F, Diagne C. Analysing economic costs of invasive alien species with the invacost R package. bioRxiv. 2022 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13929. DOI
Leung B, Lodge DM, Finnoff D, Shogren JF, Lewis MA, Lamberti G. An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2002;2691508:2407–2413. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2179. PubMed DOI PMC
Liu C, Diagne C, Angulo E, Banerjee A-K, Chen Y, Cuthbert RN, Haubrock PJ, Kirichenko N, Pattison Z, Watari Y, Xiong W, Courchamp F. Economic costs of biological invasions in Asia. NeoBiota. 2021;67:53–78. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.67.58147. DOI
Ministry for Primary Industries . Situation and outlook for primary industries: 2017. Ministry for Primary Industries, Economic Intelligence Unit; Wellington: 2017.
Ngā Rākau Taketake . New Zealand’s Biological Heritage National Science Challenge scoping panel report: Ngākau taketake. 2019.
New Zealand Government Vote agriculture, biosecurity, fisheries and food safety - primary sector - estimates 2019/20. Ministry for Primary Industries. 2019. https://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/estimates/vote-agriculture-biosecurity-fisheries-and-food-safety-primary-sector-estimates-2019-20-html https://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/estimates/vote-agriculture-biosecurity-fisheries-and-food-safety-primary-sector-estimates-2019-20-html
New Zealand Government COVID-19 funding allocation and expenditure. [04 April 2022];https://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/budgets/covid-19-funding-allocation-expenditure 2022 10(2022)
Nimmo-Bell Wellington: MAF Biosecurity New ZealandEconomic Costs of Pests to New Zealand: MAF Biosecurity New Zealand Technical Paper No: 2009/31. 2009
Nuñez MA, Pauchard A, Ricciardi A. Invasion science and the global spread of SARS-CoV-2. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2020;35(8):642–645. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.05.004. PubMed DOI PMC
Ogden NH, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM, Hui C, Davies SJ, Kumschick S, Roux JJLe, Measey J, Saul W-C, Pulliam JRC. Emerging infectious diseases and biological invasions: a call for a One Health collaboration in science and management. Royal Society Open Science. 2019;6(3):181577. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181577. PubMed DOI PMC
Paini DR, Sheppard AW, Cook DC, De Barro PJ, Worner SP, Thomas MB. Global threat to agriculture from invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2016:201602205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602205113. PubMed DOI PMC
Pimentel D, McNair S, Janecka J, Wightman J, Simmonds C, O’connell C, Wong E, Russel L, Zern J, Aquino T. Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2001;84(1):1–20. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00178-X. DOI
Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics. 2005;52(3):273–288. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002. DOI
Robertson PA, Mill A, Novoa A, Jeschke JM, Essl F, Gallardo B, Geist J, Jarić I, Lambin X, Musseau C, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Schmalensee Mvon, Shirley M, Strayer DL, Stefansson RA, Smith K, Booy O. A proposed unified framework to describe the management of biological invasions. Biological Invasions. 2020;22(9):2633–2645. doi: 10.1007/s10530-020-02298-2. DOI
Roy HE, Hesketh H, Purse BV, Eilenberg J, Santini A, Scalera R, Stentiford GD, Adriaens T, Bacela-Spychalska K, Bass D, Beckmann KM, Bessell P, Bojko J, Booy O, Cardoso AC, Essl F, Groom Q, Harrower C, Kleespies R, Martinou AF, vanOers MM, Peeler EJ, Pergl J, Rabitsch W, Roques A, Schaffner F, Schindler S, Schmidt BR, Schönrogge K, Smith J, Solarz W, Stewart A, Stroo A, Tricarico E, Turvey KMA, Vannini A, Vilà M, Woodward S, Wynns AA, Dunn AM. Alien pathogens on the horizon: opportunities for predicting their threat to wildlife. Conservation Letters. 2017;10(4):477–484. doi: 10.1111/conl.12297. DOI
Russell JC. A comparison of attitudes towards introduced wildlife in New Zealand in 1994 and 2012. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 2014;44(4):136–151. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2014.944192. DOI
Russell JC, Innes JG, Brown PH, Byrom AE. Predator-Free New Zealand: conservation country. Bioscience. 2015;65(5):520–525. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biv012. PubMed DOI PMC
Russell JC, Meyer J-Y, Holmes ND, Pagad S. Invasive alien species on islands: impacts, distribution, interactions and management. Environmental Conservation. 2017;44(4):359–370. doi: 10.1017/S0376892917000297. DOI
Saunders JT, Saunders CM, Buwalda JG, Gerard PJ, Bourdôt GW, Wratten SD, Goldson SL. The economic impact of failures in plant protection to New Zealand. PeerJ. 2013;1:e140v141. doi: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.140v1. PrePrints. PubMed DOI
Seebens H, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Capinha C, Dawson W, Dullinger S, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, van Kleunen M, Kühn I, Jeschke JM, Lenzner B, Liebhold AM, Pattison Z, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Winter M, Essl F. Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050. Global Change Biology. 2021;27(5):970–982. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15333. PubMed DOI
Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Pagad S, Pyšek P, Winter M, Arianoutsou M, Bacher S, Blasius B, Brundu G, Capinha C, Celesti-Grapow L, Dawson W, Dullinger S, Fuentes N, Jäger H, Kartesz J, Kenis M, Kreft H, Kühn I, Lenzner B, Liebhold A, Mosena A, Moser D, Nishino M, Pearman D, Pergl J, Rabitsch W, Rojas-Sandoval J, Roques A, Rorke S, Rossinelli S, Roy HE, Scalera R, Schindler S, Štajerová K, Tokarska-Guzik B, van Kleunen M, Walker K, Weigelt P, Yamanaka T, Essl F. No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nature Communications. 2017;8(1):14435. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14435. PubMed DOI PMC
Shackleton RT, Richardson DM, Shackleton CM, Bennett B, Crowley SL, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Estévez RA, Fischer A, Kueffer C, Kull CA, Marchante E, Novoa A, Potgieter LJ, Vaas J, Vaz AS, BMH Larson. Explaining people’s perceptions of invasive alien species: a conceptual framework. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019a;229:10–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.045. PubMed DOI
Shackleton RT, Shackleton CM, Kull CA. The role of invasive alien species in shaping local livelihoods and human well-being: a review. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019b;229:145–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.007. PubMed DOI
Sheppard CS, Burns BR, Stanley MC. Future-proofing weed management for the effects of climate change: is New Zealand underestimating the risk of increased plant invasions? New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 2016;40(3):398–405. doi: 10.20417/nzjecol.40.45. DOI
Simberloff D. New Zealand as a leader in conservation practice and invasion management. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 2019;49(3):259–280. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2019.1652193. DOI
Towns DR, West C, Broome K. Purposes, outcomes and challenges of eradicating invasive mammals from New Zealand islands: an historical perspective. Wildlife Research. 2013;40(2):94. doi: 10.1071/WR12064. DOI
Turner J, Bulman L, Richardson B, Moore J. Cost-benefit analysis of biosecurity and forest health research. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science. 2004;34(3):324–343.
Vilcinskas A. Pathogens as biological weapons of invasive species. PLOS Pathogens. 2015;11(4):e1004714. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004714. PubMed DOI PMC
Wilson N, McIntyre M, Blaschke P, Muellner P, Mansoor OD, Baker MG. Potential public health benefits from eradicating rats in New Zealand cities and a tentative research agenda. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 2018;48(4):280–290. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2017.1343193. DOI
figshare
10.6084/m9.figshare.12668570