Biological invasion costs reveal insufficient proactive management worldwide
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
I 4011
Austrian Science Fund FWF - Austria
PubMed
35148893
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153404
PII: S0048-9697(22)00496-X
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Biosecurity, Delayed control and eradication, Global trends, InvaCost, Invasive alien species, Socio-economic impacts,
- MeSH
- bezobratlí MeSH
- ekosystém * MeSH
- zavlečené druhy * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Severní Amerika MeSH
The global increase in biological invasions is placing growing pressure on the management of ecological and economic systems. However, the effectiveness of current management expenditure is difficult to assess due to a lack of standardised measurement across spatial, taxonomic and temporal scales. Furthermore, there is no quantification of the spending difference between pre-invasion (e.g. prevention) and post-invasion (e.g. control) stages, although preventative measures are considered to be the most cost-effective. Here, we use a comprehensive database of invasive alien species economic costs (InvaCost) to synthesise and model the global management costs of biological invasions, in order to provide a better understanding of the stage at which these expenditures occur. Since 1960, reported management expenditures have totalled at least US$95.3 billion (in 2017 values), considering only highly reliable and actually observed costs - 12-times less than damage costs from invasions ($1130.6 billion). Pre-invasion management spending ($2.8 billion) was over 25-times lower than post-invasion expenditure ($72.7 billion). Management costs were heavily geographically skewed towards North America (54%) and Oceania (30%). The largest shares of expenditures were directed towards invasive alien invertebrates in terrestrial environments. Spending on invasive alien species management has grown by two orders of magnitude since 1960, reaching an estimated $4.2 billion per year globally (in 2017 values) in the 2010s, but remains 1-2 orders of magnitude lower than damages. National management spending increased with incurred damage costs, with management actions delayed on average by 11 years globally following damage reporting. These management delays on the global level have caused an additional invasion cost of approximately $1.2 trillion, compared to scenarios with immediate management. Our results indicate insufficient management - particularly pre-invasion - and urge better investment to prevent future invasions and to control established alien species. Recommendations to improve reported management cost comprehensiveness, resolution and terminology are also made.
Department of Biology Carleton University Ottawa Ontario K1S 5B6 Canada
Department of Integrative Biology University of South Florida Tampa FL 33620 United States
GEOMAR Helmholtz Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel 24105 Kiel Germany
ISEM UMR226 Université de Montpellier CNRS IRD EPHE 34090 Montpellier France
School of Biological Sciences King's College University of Aberdeen Aberdeen AB24 3FX United Kingdom
Université Paris Saclay CNRS AgroParisTech Ecologie Systématique Evolution 91405 Orsay France
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Recent advances in availability and synthesis of the economic costs of biological invasions
Unveiling the hidden economic toll of biological invasions in the European Union
Underexplored and growing economic costs of invasive alien trees
Building a synthesis of economic costs of biological invasions in New Zealand