Underexplored and growing economic costs of invasive alien trees
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
37268662
PubMed Central
PMC10238485
DOI
10.1038/s41598-023-35802-4
PII: 10.1038/s41598-023-35802-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- stromy * MeSH
- zavlečené druhy MeSH
- zemědělství MeSH
- životní prostředí * MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
The high ecological impacts of many invasive alien trees have been well documented. However, to date, we lacked synthesis of their economic impacts, hampering management actions. Here, we summarize the cost records of invasive trees to (I) identify invasive trees with cost information and their geographic locations, (II) investigate the types of costs recorded and sectors impacted by invasive trees and (III) analyze the relationships between categories of uses of invasive trees and the invasion costs attributed to these uses. We found reliable cost records only for 72 invasive trees, accumulating a reported total cost of $19.2 billion between 1960 and 2020. Agriculture was the sector with the highest cost records due to invasive trees. Most costs were incurred as resource damages and losses ($3.5 billion). Close attention to the ornamental sector is important for reducing the economic impact of invasive trees, since most invasive trees with cost records were introduced for that use. Despite massive reported costs of invasive trees, there remain large knowledge gaps on most invasive trees, sectors, and geographic scales, indicating that the real cost is severely underestimated. This highlights the need for further concerted and widely-distributed research efforts regarding the economic impact of invasive trees.
Department of Biology and Biochemistry University of Houston Houston TX USA
Department of Biology Carleton University Ottawa ON K1S 5B6 Canada
Estación Biológica de Doñana Avda Americo Vespucio 26 41092 Sevilla Spain
Nürtingen Geislingen University Schelmenwasen 4 8 72622 Nürtingen Germany
Zobrazit více v PubMed
IPBES. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Díaz S, Settele J, Brondízio ES, Ngo HT, Guèze M, Agard J, Arneth A, Balvanera P, Brauman KA, Butchart SHM, Chan KMA, Garibaldi LA, Ichii K, Liu J, Subramanian SM, Midgley GF, Miloslavich P, Molnár Z, Obura D, Pfaff A, Polasky S, Purvis A, Razzaque J, Reyers B, Roy Chowdhury R, Shin YJ, Visseren-Hamakers IJ, Willis KJ, Zayas CN (Eds) IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 56 (2019). 10.5281/zenodo.
Pyšek P, et al. Scientists' warning on invasive alien species. Biol. Rev. 2020;95:1511–1534. doi: 10.1111/brv.12627. PubMed DOI PMC
Diagne C, et al. High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature. 2021;592:571–576. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6. PubMed DOI
Ricciardi A, et al. Four priority areas to advance invasion science in the face of rapid environmental change. Environ. Rev. 2021;29:119–141. doi: 10.1139/er-2020-0088. DOI
Vilà M, et al. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: A meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2011;14:702–708. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x. PubMed DOI
Castro Díez P, et al. Global effects of non-native tree species on multiple ecosystem services. Biol. Rev. 2019;94:1477–1501. doi: 10.1111/brv.12511. PubMed DOI PMC
Richardson DM, Rejmánek M. Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species–a global review. Divers. Distrib. 2011;17:788–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00782.x. DOI
Dickie IA, et al. Conflicting values: Ecosystem services and invasive tree management. Biol. Invasions. 2014;16:705–719. doi: 10.1007/s10530-013-0609-6. DOI
Brundu G, Richardson DM. Planted forests and invasive alien trees in Europe: A code for managing existing and future plantings to mitigate the risk of negative impacts from invasions. NeoBiota. 2016;30:5–47. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.30.7015. DOI
Nuñez MA, et al. Should tree invasions be used in treeless ecosystems to mitigate climate change? Front. Ecol. Environ. 2021;19:334–341. doi: 10.1002/fee.2346. DOI
Mohamed EH, Mbataru P. Socio-economic contribution of Prosopis juliflora on the livelihoods of local communities in Garissa County. Kenya. J. Int. Bus. Innov. Strateg. Manag. 2021;5:1–17.
Kourantidou M, et al. Invasive alien species as simultaneous benefits and burdens: Trends, stakeholder perceptions and management. Biol. Invasions. 2022;24:1905–1926. doi: 10.1007/s10530-021-02727-w. DOI
Aguiar A, Jr, Barbosa RI, Barbosa JB, Mourão M., Jr Invasion of Acacia mangium in Amazonian savannas following planting for forestry. Plant Ecolg. Divers. 2014;7:359–369. doi: 10.1080/17550874.2013.771714. DOI
van Wilgen BW, et al. National-scale strategic approaches for managing introduced plants: Insights from Australian acacias in South Africa. Divers. Distrib. 2021;17:1060–1075. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00785.x. DOI
Jäger H, Kowarik I, Tye A. Destruction without extinction: Long term impacts of an invasive tree species on Galápagos highland vegetation. J. Ecol. 2009;97:1252–1263. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01578.x. DOI
Le Maitre DC, et al. Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: Implications for management and restoration. Divers. Distrib. 2021;17:1015–1029. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00816.x. DOI
Dyderski MK, Jagodziński AM. Impact of invasive tree species on natural regeneration species composition, diversity, and density. Forests. 2020;11:456. doi: 10.3390/f11040456. DOI
Fernandez RD, Castro-Díez P, Aragon R, Pérez-Harguindeguy N. Changes in community functional structure and ecosystem properties along an invasion gradient of Ligustrum lucidum. J. Veg. Sci. 2021;32:e13098. doi: 10.1111/jvs.13098. DOI
Stewart PS, Hill RA, Stephens PA, Whittingham MJ, Dawson W. Impacts of invasive plants on animal behaviour. Ecol. Lett. 2021;24:891–907. doi: 10.1111/ele.13687. PubMed DOI
Le Maitre DC, Gush MB, Dzikiti S. Impacts of invading alien plant species on water flows at stand and catchment scales. AoB Plants. 2021;7:48. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plv043. PubMed DOI PMC
Taylor KT, et al. Pinus contorta invasions increase wildfire fuel loads and may create a positive feedback with fire. Ecol. 2017;98:678–687. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1673. PubMed DOI
Zavaleta E. Valuing ecosystem services lost to Tamarix invasion in the United States. In: Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ, editors. Invasive Species in a Changing World. Island Press; 2000. pp. 261–300.
De Wit MP, Crookes DJ, van Wilgen BW. Conflicts of interest in environmental management: Estimating the costs and benefits of a tree invasion. Biol. Invasions. 2001;3:167–178. doi: 10.1023/A:1014563702261. DOI
Turpie J. The role of resource economics in the control of invasive alien plants in South Africa: Working for water. S. African J. Sci. 2004;100:87–93.
Wise RM, van Wilgen BW, Le Maitre DC. Costs, benefits and management options for an invasive alien tree species: The case of mesquite in the Northern Cape, South Africa. J. Arid Environ. 2012;84:80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.03.001. DOI
Wild S. South Africa's invasive species guzzle precious water and cost US $450 million a year. Nature. 2018;563:164–166. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07286-0. PubMed DOI
Dodet M, Collet C. When should exotic forest plantation tree species be considered as an invasive threat and how should we treat them? Biol. invasions. 2012;14:1765–1778. doi: 10.1007/s10530-012-0202-4. DOI
Estévez RA, Anderson CB, Pizarro JC, Burgman MA. Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management. Conserv. Biol. 2015;29:19–30. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12359. PubMed DOI
van Wilgen BW, Richardson DM. Challenges and trade-offs in the management of invasive alien trees. Biol. Invasions. 2014;16:721–734. doi: 10.1007/s10530-013-0615-8. DOI
Low T. Australian acacias: Weeds or useful trees? Biol. Invasions. 2012;14:2217–2227. doi: 10.1007/s10530-012-0243-8. DOI
Rejmánek M, Richardson DM. Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species–2013 update of the global database. Divers. Distrib. 2013;19:1093–1094. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12075. DOI
Diagne C, Catford J, Essl F, Nuñez M, Courchamp F. What are the economic costs of biological invasions? A complex topic requiring international and interdisciplinary expertise. NeoBiota. 2020;63:25–37. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.63.55260. DOI
Angulo E, et al. Economic costs of invasive alien ants worldwide. Biol. Invasions. 2022;24:2041–2060. doi: 10.1007/s10530-022-02791-w. DOI
Diagne, C., et al. Economic costs of invasive rodents worldwide: The tip of the iceberg. Research Square Pre-print: 1–24. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-387256/v1 (2021b). PubMed PMC
Haubrock PJ, Cuthbert RN, Ricciardi A, Diagne C, Courchamp F. Economic costs of invasive bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Divers. Distrib. 2022;28:1010–1021. doi: 10.1111/ddi.13501. DOI
Richardson DM, Rejmánek M. Invasive conifers: A global survey and predictive framework. Divers. Distrib. 2004;10:321–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00096.x. DOI
Nuñez MA, et al. Ecology and management of invasive Pinaceae around the world: Progress and challenges. Biol. Invasions. 2017;19:3099–3120. doi: 10.1007/s10530-017-1483-4. DOI
Diagne C, et al. The economic costs of biological invasions in Africa: A growing but neglected threat? NeoBiota. 2021;67:11–51. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.67.59132. DOI
Angulo E, et al. Non-English languages enrich scientific knowledge: The example of economic costs of biological invasions. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;775:144441. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144441. PubMed DOI
Heringer G, et al. The economic costs of biological invasions in Central and South America: A first regional assessment. NeoBiota. 2021;67:401–426. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.67.59193. DOI
Van Wilgen BW, Richardson DM. Three centuries of managing introduced conifers in South Africa: Benefits, impacts, changing perceptions and conflict resolution. J. Environ. Manag. 2012;106:56–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.052. PubMed DOI
Le Maitre DC, et al. Invasive alien trees and water resources in South Africa: Case studies of the costs and benefits of management. For. Ecol. Manag. 2002;160:143–159. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00474-1. DOI
Richardson DM, et al. Vectors and pathways of biological invasions in South Africa-Past, future and present. In: Ruiz G, Carlton J, et al., editors. Pathways of Invasions: Strategies for Management Across Space and Time. Island Press; 2003. pp. 292–349.
van Wilgen BW, Measey J, Richardson DM, Wilson JR. Biological invasions in South Africa: An overview. In: van Wilgen BW, Measey J, Richardson DM, Wilson JR, Zengeya TA, editors. Biological Invasions in South Africa. Springer; 2020. pp. 3–31.
Richardson, D. M., et al. The biogeography of South African terrestrial plant invasions. In: Van Wilgen, B.W., Measey, J., Richardson, D.M., Wilson, J.R.U. & G.J., Zengeya, T. (Eds.). Biological invasions in South Africa. Springer 67–96 (2020).
Ramírez GL. Palma africana: ¿oportunidad o amenaza para el ambiente y para el país? Gestión y ambiente. 2003;6:129–138.
Mendieta, J. C. & Cárdenas Toro, J. Lineamientos para la evaluación del impacto económico de las plantas invasoras (2010).
Hudgins, E. et al. The ecological dimension of global trade: Origin and recipient regions of biological invasion costs. Preprint at 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1762292/v1 (2023).
Hanley N, Roberts M. The economic benefits of invasive species management. People Nat. 2019;1:124–137. doi: 10.1002/pan3.31. DOI
Cuthbert R, et al. Biological invasion costs reveal insufficient proactive management worldwide. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;819:153404. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153404. PubMed DOI
Dehnen-Schmutz K, Touza J, Perrings C, Williamson M. A century of the ornamental plant trade and its impact on invasion success. Divers. Distrib. 2007;13:527–534. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00359.x. DOI
Kowarik, I., & Lippe, M. V. D. Pathways in plant invasions. In: Nentwig, W. (eds) Biological Invasions. Ecological Studies, vol 193. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-540-36920-2_3 (2008).
van Kleunen M, et al. Economic use of plants is key to their naturalization success. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3201. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16982-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Richardson DM. Forestry trees as invasive aliens. Conserv. Biol. 1998;12:18–26. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96392.x. DOI
Essl F, Moser D, Dullinger S, Mang T, Hulme PE. Selection for commercial forestry determines global patterns of alien conifer invasions. Divers. Distrib. 2010;16:911–921. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00705.x. DOI
Dechoum MDS, Giehl ELH, Sühs RB, Silveira TCL, Ziller SR. Citizen engagement in the management of non-native invasive pines: Does it make a difference? Biol. Invasions. 2019;21:175–188. doi: 10.1007/s10530-018-1814-0. DOI
Paap T, Burgess TI, Wingfield MJ. Urban trees: Bridge-heads for forest pest invasions and sentinels for early detection. Biol. Invasions. 2017;19:3515–3526. doi: 10.1007/s10530-017-1595-x. DOI
Dang Y, et al. Introduced plants induce outbreaks of a native pest and facilitate invasion in the plants' native range: Evidence from the emerald ash borer. J. Ecol. 2021;110:593–604. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13822. DOI
Hudgins EJ, Koch FH, Ambrose MJ, Leung B. Hotspots of pest induced US urban tree death, 2020–2050. J. Appl. Ecol. 2022;59:1302–1312. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.14141. DOI
Masson-Delmotte, V., et al. Global warming of 1.5 C. Sp. Rep. 1, 43–50 (2018).
Pataki DE, et al. The benefits and limits of urban tree planting for environmental and human health. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2021;9:603757. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.603757. DOI
Shackleton CM, Shackleton RT. Knowledge, perceptions and willingness to control designated invasive tree species in urban household gardens in South Africa. Biol. Invasions. 2016;18:1599–1609. doi: 10.1007/s10530-016-1104-7. DOI
Richardson DM, Hui C, Nuñez MA, Pauchard A. Tree invasions: Patterns, processes, challenges and opportunities. Biol. invasions. 2014;16:473–481. doi: 10.1007/s10530-013-0606-9. DOI
Jarić I, et al. The role of species charisma in biological invasions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2020;18:345–353. doi: 10.1002/fee.2195. DOI
Nuñez, M.A., Dimarco, R.D., & Simberloff, D. Why some exotic species are deeply integrated into local cultures while others are reviled. In: Rozzi R, May Jr RH, Chapin III FS, Massardo F, Gavin MC, Klaver IJ, Pauchard A, Nuñez MA, Simberloff D (Eds) From Biocultural Homogenization to Biocultural Conservation. Ecology and Ethics Series (Vol. 3). Springer 219–231 (2018).
Brundu G, et al. Global guidelines for the sustainable use of non-native trees to prevent tree invasions and mitigate their negative impacts. NeoBiota. 2020;61:65–116. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.61.58380. DOI
BGCI (2023). GlobalTreeSearch online database (version 1.6). Botanic Gardens Conservation International. Richmond, UK. 10.13140/RG.2.2.34206.61761. https://tools.bgci.org/global_tree_search.php Accessed 31 Jan 2023.
Diagne C, et al. InvaCost, a public database of the economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Sci. Data. 2020;7:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00586-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Leroy B, et al. Analysing economic costs of invasive alien species with the invacost r package. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2022;00:1–8. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13929. DOI
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2022).
Massicotte, P., South, A. rnaturalearth: World Map Data from Natural Earth. R package version 0.3.2 (2023).
Wickham H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. 2. Springer; 2016.
Arel-Bundock V, Enevoldsen N, Yetman CJ. Countrycode: An R package to convert country names and country codes. J. Open Source Softw. 2018;3:848. doi: 10.21105/joss.00848. DOI
figshare
10.6084/m9.figshare.12668570