High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
33790468
DOI
10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6
PII: 10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- bezobratlí MeSH
- biodiverzita * MeSH
- ekologie ekonomika MeSH
- environmentalistika ekonomika MeSH
- geografická kartografie MeSH
- internacionalita * MeSH
- lineární modely MeSH
- obratlovci MeSH
- rostliny MeSH
- zavlečené druhy ekonomika trendy MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Biological invasions are responsible for substantial biodiversity declines as well as high economic losses to society and monetary expenditures associated with the management of these invasions1,2. The InvaCost database has enabled the generation of a reliable, comprehensive, standardized and easily updatable synthesis of the monetary costs of biological invasions worldwide3. Here we found that the total reported costs of invasions reached a minimum of US$1.288 trillion (2017 US dollars) over the past few decades (1970-2017), with an annual mean cost of US$26.8 billion. Moreover, we estimate that the annual mean cost could reach US$162.7 billion in 2017. These costs remain strongly underestimated and do not show any sign of slowing down, exhibiting a consistent threefold increase per decade. We show that the documented costs are widely distributed and have strong gaps at regional and taxonomic scales, with damage costs being an order of magnitude higher than management expenditures. Research approaches that document the costs of biological invasions need to be further improved. Nonetheless, our findings call for the implementation of consistent management actions and international policy agreements that aim to reduce the burden of invasive alien species.
CEE M UMR5211 Univ Montpellier CNRS INRAE Institut Agro Montpellier France
ISEM Univ Montpellier CNRS IRD Montpellier France
MIVEGEC Univ Montpellier IRD CNRS Montpellier France
Université Paris Saclay CNRS AgroParisTech Ecologie Systématique Evolution Orsay France
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Born, W., Rauschmayer, F. & Bräuer, I. Economic evaluation of biological invasions—a survey. Ecol. Econ. 55, 321–336 (2005). DOI
Jackson, T. Addressing the economic costs of invasive alien species: some methodological and empirical issues. Int. J. Sustain. Soc. 7, 221–240 (2015). DOI
Diagne, C. et al. InvaCost, a public database of the economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Sci. Data 7, 277 (2020). DOI
Bellard, C., Cassey, P. & Blackburn, T. M. Alien species as a driver of recent extinctions. Biol. Lett. 12, 20150623 (2016). DOI
Kumschick, S. et al. Ecological impacts of alien species: quantification, scope, caveats, and recommendations. Bioscience 65, 55–63 (2015). DOI
Ogden, N. H. et al. Emerging infectious diseases and biological invasions: a call for a One Health collaboration in science and management. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 181577 (2019). DOI
Jones, B. A. Invasive species impacts on human well-being using the life satisfaction index. Ecol. Econ. 134, 250–257 (2017). DOI
Bradshaw, C. J. A. et al. Massive yet grossly underestimated global costs of invasive insects. Nat. Commun. 7, 12986 (2016). DOI
Seebens, H. et al. Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 970–982 (2020). DOI
Essl, F. et al. Drivers of future alien species impacts: an expert-based assessment. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4880–4893 (2020). DOI
Courchamp, F. et al. Invasion biology: specific problems and possible solutions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 13–22 (2017). DOI
Lenzner, B. et al. A framework for global twenty-first century scenarios and models of biological invasions. Bioscience 69, 697–710 (2019). DOI
Heger, T. et al. Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology. Ambio 42, 527–540 (2013). DOI
Larson, D. L. et al. A framework for sustainable invasive species management: environmental, social, and economic objectives. J. Environ. Manage. 92, 14–22 (2011). DOI
Hoffmann, B. D. & Broadhurst, L. M. The economic cost of managing invasive species in Australia. NeoBiota 31, 1–18 (2016). DOI
Pimentel, D. et al. Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 84, 1–20 (2001). DOI
Paini, D. R. et al. Global threat to agriculture from invasive species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7575–7579 (2016). DOI
Latombe, G. et al. A vision for global monitoring of biological invasions. Biol. Conserv. 213, 295–308 (2017). DOI
Diagne, C., Catford, J. A., Essl, F., Nuñez, M. A. & Courchamp, F. What are the economic costs of biological invasions? A complex topic requiring international and interdisciplinary expertise. NeoBiota 63, 25–37 (2020). DOI
Seebens, H. et al. No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat. Commun. 8, 14435 (2017). DOI
Bishop, M. J. et al. Effects of ocean sprawl on ecological connectivity: impacts and solutions. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 492, 7–30 (2017). DOI
Bacher, S. et al. Socio‐Economic Impact Classification of Alien Taxa (SEICAT). Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 159–168 (2018).
Angulo, E. et al. Non-English languages enrich scientific knowledge: the example of economic costs of biological invasions. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144441 (2021).
Colautti, R. I. & MacIsaac, H. J. A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species. Divers. Distrib. 10, 135–141 (2004). DOI
Dana, E. D., Jeschke, J. M. & García-de-Lomas, J. Decision tools for managing biological invasions: existing biases and future needs. Oryx 48, 56–63 (2014). DOI
Jeschke, J. M., Keesing, F. & Ostfeld, R. S. Novel organisms: comparing invasive species, GMOs, and emerging pathogens. Ambio 42, 541–548 (2013). DOI
Jones, B. A. Tree shade, temperature, and human health: evidence from invasive species-induced deforestation. Ecol. Econ. 156, 12–23 (2019). DOI
Jones, B. A. & McDermott, S. M. Health impacts of invasive species through an altered natural environment: assessing air pollution sinks as a causal pathway. Environ. Resour. Econ. 71, 23–43 (2018). DOI
Pyšek, P. et al. Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 237–244 (2008). DOI
Clout, M. N. & Russell, J. C. The invasion ecology of mammals: a global perspective. Wildl. Res. 35, 180–184 (2008). DOI
Early, R. et al. Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat. Commun. 7, 12485 (2016). DOI
Jarić, I. et al. Crypticity in biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 291–302 (2019). DOI
Pascual, U. et al. in The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations (ed. Kumar, P.) 183–256 (Earthscan, 2010).
Spangenberg, J. H. & Settele, J. Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecol. Complex. 7, 327–337 (2010). DOI
Kallis, G., Gómez-Baggethun, E. & Zografos, C. To value or not to value? That is not the question. Ecol. Econ. 94, 97–105 (2013). DOI
Meinard, Y., Dereniowska, M. & Gharbi, J.-S. The ethical stakes in monetary valuation methods for conservation purposes. Biol. Conserv. 199, 67–74 (2016). DOI
Faulkner, K. T., Robertson, M. P. & Wilson, J. R. U. Stronger regional biosecurity is essential to prevent hundreds of harmful biological invasions. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 2449–2462 (2020). DOI
Pagad, S., Genovesi, P., Carnevali, L., Schigel, D. & McGeoch, M. A. Introducing the Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species. Sci. Data 5, 170202 (2018). DOI
Holden, M. H., Nyrop, J. P. & Ellner, S. P. The economic benefit of time‐varying surveillance effort for invasive species management. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 712–721 (2016). DOI
Hulme, P. E. et al. Integrating invasive species policies across ornamental horticulture supply chains to prevent plant invasions. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 92–98 (2018). DOI
Chaffin, B. C. et al. Biological invasions, ecological resilience and adaptive governance. J. Environ. Manage. 183, 399–407 (2016). DOI
Sardain, A., Sardain, E. & Leung, B. Global forecasts of shipping traffic and biological invasions to 2050. Nat. Sustain. 2, 274–282 (2019). DOI
Seebens, H. Invasion ecology: expanding trade and the dispersal of alien species. Curr. Biol. 29, R120–R122 (2019). DOI
Leroy, B. et al. Analysing global economic costs of invasive alien species with the invacost R package. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.10.419432 (2020).
Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agenda
Curbing the major and growing threats from invasive alien species is urgent and achievable
Plant invasion and naturalization are influenced by genome size, ecology and economic use globally
A latitudinal gradient in Darwin's naturalization conundrum at the global scale for flowering plants
Native diversity buffers against severity of non-native tree invasions
Recent advances in availability and synthesis of the economic costs of biological invasions
Unveiling the hidden economic toll of biological invasions in the European Union
Underexplored and growing economic costs of invasive alien trees
The impact of land use on non-native species incidence and number in local assemblages worldwide
Alien insect dispersal mediated by the global movement of commodities
Building a synthesis of economic costs of biological invasions in New Zealand