• This record comes from PubMed

Invasion costs, impacts, and human agency: response to Sagoff 2020

. 2020 Dec ; 34 (6) : 1579-1582. [epub] 20200730

Language English Country United States Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Comment

Article impact statement: In an era of profound biodiversity crisis, invasion costs, invader impacts, and human agency should not be dismissed.

Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT U K

Centre for Invasion Biology Department of Botany and Zoology Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa

CNRS AgroParisTech Ecologie Systématique Evolution Université Paris Saclay Orsay 91405 France

Department of Biology University of Fribourg Chemin du Musée 10 Fribourg 1700 Switzerland

Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna Vienna 1030 Austria

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee 569 Dabney Hall 1416 Circle Dr Knoxville TN 37996 U S A

Department of Ecology Faculty of Science Charles University Viničná 7 Prague CZ 128 44 Czech Republic

Department of Invasion Ecology Institute of Botany Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice CZ 252 43 Czech Republic

Department of River Ecology and Conservation Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt Gelnhausen 60325 Germany

Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice Zátiší 728 2 Vodňany 389 25 Czech Republic

GEOMAR Helmholtz Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel Kiel 24105 Germany

Institute for Environmental Protection and Research ISPRA and Chair IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group Rome Italy

Institute of Zoology Zoological Society of London Regent's Park London NW1 4RY U K

Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad Santiago Chile

Laboratorio de Invasiones Biológicas Facultad de Ciencias Forestales Universidad de Concepción Casilla 160 C Concepción Chile

Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University Université Paris Dauphine CNRS UMR [7243] Lamcade Place Lattre de Tassigny Paris 75016 France

Redpath Museum McGill University Montreal Quebec H3A 0C4 Canada

School of Biological Sciences Queen's University Belfast Belfast BT9 5DL U K

School of Biological Sciences University of Auckland Private Bag 92019 Auckland 1142 New Zealand

Comment On

PubMed

Comment In

PubMed

See more in PubMed

Abrams PA. 2000. The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:79-105.

Baider C, Florens FBV. 2011. Control of invasive alien weeds averts imminent plant extinction. Biological Invasions 13:2641-2646.

Blackburn TM, Bellard C, Ricciardi A. 2019. Alien versus native species as drivers of recent extinctions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 17:203-207.

Bradshaw CJ, Leroy B, Bellard C, Roiz D, Albert C, Fournier A, Barbet-Massin M, Salles J-M, Simard F, Courchamp F. 2016. Massive yet grossly underestimated global costs of invasive insects. Nature Communications 7:12986.

Cuthbert RN, Callaghan A, Dick JTA. 2019. A novel metric reveals biotic resistance potential and informs predictions of invasion success. Scientific Reports 9:15314.

Diagne C, et al. 2020. InvaCost: a public database of the economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Scientific Data: in press.

Dick JTA, et al. 2017. Invader relative impact potential: a new metric to understand and predict the ecological impacts of existing, emerging and future invasive alien species. Journal of Applied Ecology 54:1259-1267.

Downey PO, Richardson DM. 2016. Alien plant invasions and native plant extinctions: a six-threshold framework. AoB Plants 8:plw047.

Fournier A, Penone C, Pennino MG, Courchamp F. 2019. Predicting future invaders and future invasions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116:7905-7910.

Hanley N, Roberts M. 2019. The economic benefits of invasive species management. People and Nature 1:124-137.

Holitzki TM, MacKenzie RA, Wiegner TN, McDermid KJ. 2013. Differences in ecological structure, function, and native species abundance between native and invaded Hawaiian streams. Ecological Applications 23:1367-1383.

Holmes TP, Aukema JE, Von Holle B, Liebhold A, Sills E. 2009. Economic impacts of invasive species in forests: past, present, and future. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1162:18-38.

Kettunen M, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, Pagad S, Starfinger U, ten Brink P, Shine C. 2009. Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS). Institute for European Environmental Policy, Brussels, Belgium.

Paini D, Sheppard AW, Cook DC, De Barro PJ, Worner SP, Thomas MB. 2017. Global threat to agriculture from invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113:7575-7579.

Pauchard A, et al. 2018. Biodiversity assessments: origin matters. PLoS Biology 16:e2006686.

Perrings C. 2011. Elton and the economics of biological invasions. Pages 315-328 in Richardson DM, editor. Fifty years of invasion ecology: the legacy of Charles Elton. Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Petersen AM, Vincent EM, Westerling AL. 2019. Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians. Nature Communications 10:3502.

Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience 50:53-66.

Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52:273-288.

Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Hejda M, Schaffner U, Vilà M. 2012. A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Global Change Biology 18:1725-1737.

Ricciardi A, Ryan R. 2018a. The exponential growth of invasive species denialism. Biological Invasions 20:549-553.

Ricciardi A, Ryan R. 2018b. Invasive species denialism revisited: response to Sagoff. Biological Invasions 20:2731-2738.

Russell JC, Blackburn TM. 2017. The rise of invasive species denialism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32:3-6.

Russell JC, Kueffer C. 2019. Island biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 44:31-60.

Sagoff M. 2020. Fact and value in invasion biology. Conservation Biology 34:581-588.

Simberloff D, et al. 2013. Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28:58-66.

van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Schlaepfer D, Jeschke JM, Fischer M. 2010. Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecology Letters 13:947-958.

van Wilgen BW, Wilson JR. 2018. The status of biological invasions and their management in South Africa in 2017. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch and DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...