• This record comes from PubMed

Effect of an overhead goal on landing error scoring system and jump height measures

. 2023 Jan ; 59 () : 115-121. [epub] 20221124

Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial

Links

PubMed 36528004
DOI 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.11.005
PII: S1466-853X(22)00150-X
Knihovny.cz E-resources

OBJECTIVES: Compare overall Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) scores, risk categorisation, specific LESS errors, and double-leg jump-landing jump heights between overhead goal and no goal conditions. DESIGN: Randomised cross-over. SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 76 (51% male). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants landed from a 30-cm box to 50% of their body height and immediately jumped vertically for maximum height. Participants completed three trials under two random-ordered conditions: with and without overhead goal. Group-level mean LESS scores, risk categorisation (5-error threshold), specific landing errors, and jump heights were compared between conditions. RESULTS: Mean LESS scores were greater (0.3 errors, p < 0.001) with the overhead goal, but this small difference was not clinically meaningful. Similarly, although the number of high-risk participants was greater with the overhead goal (p = 0.039), the 9.2% difference was trivial. Participants jumped 2.7 cm higher with the overhead goal (p < 0.001) without affecting the occurrence of any specific LESS errors. DISCUSSION: Performing the LESS with an overhead goal enhances sport specificity and elicits greater vertical jump performances with minimal change in landing errors and injury-risk categorisation. Adding an overhead goal to LESS might enhance its suitability for injury risk screening, although the predictive value of LESS with an overhead goal needs confirmation.

References provided by Crossref.org

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...