Diurnal raptors at rescue centres in the Czech Republic: Reasons for admission, outcomes, and length of stay
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
36584191
PubMed Central
PMC9803276
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0279501
PII: PONE-D-22-09984
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- délka pobytu MeSH
- divoká zvířata zranění MeSH
- dravci * MeSH
- hospitalizace MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nemoci ptáků * etiologie MeSH
- poranění elektrickým proudem * komplikace MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika epidemiologie MeSH
Rescue centres play an important role in the protection of raptors living in the wild by caring for injured or debilitated animals and abandoned young with the aim of returning them to the wild. A total of 22,538 raptors were admitted to 34 rescue centres in the Czech Republic in the years 2010-2019, with an increasing trend during the monitored period (rSp = 0.7333, p < 0.05). The most frequent reasons for their admission were other injuries and fractures (26.52%), the admission of young (22.98%), and the admission of raptors injured by electric shock injuries (20.51%). It proved possible to release 42.45% of admitted raptors back into the wild, the majority of which (91.05%) were released using the hard-release method. Foster parents were used in 1% of cases and a replacement nest in 0.2% of cases involving the rearing of young. In spite of all the care provided at rescue centres, a total of 39.97% of raptors admitted either died or had to be euthanized. Among them, most raptors were euthanized or died due to injuries caused by collision with a vehicle, electric shock injuries, and other injuries. This generally occurred shortly after admission (a median of two days). The importance of the work of rescue centres lies not merely in returning injured raptors back into the wild (which proves possible in around half of all cases), but also in obtaining information about the factors endangering raptors in the wild and contributing toward a decline in their populations. The findings provide information about human-wildlife interactions in the Czech Republic and their implications for conservation as well as on the effectiveness of rescue centres to successfully treat and subsequently release raptors back into the wild.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
González Martín Moro J, Hernández Verdejo JL, Clement Corral A. The visual system of diurnal raptors: Updated review. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmo. 2017;92: 225–232. PubMed
Potier S, Bonadonna F, Kelber A, Martin GR, Isard P-F, Dulaurent T, et al.. Visual abilities in two raptors with different ecology. J Exp Biol. 2016;219: 2639–2649. doi: 10.1242/jeb.142083 PubMed DOI
Fowler DW, Freedman EA, Scannella JB. Predatory functional morphology in raptors: interdigital variation in talon size is related to prey restraint and immobilisation technique. PLoS ONE. 2009;4: e7999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007999 PubMed DOI PMC
Mirski P. Effect of selected environmental factors on hunting methods and hunting success in the lesser spotted eagle Aquila pomarina in North-Eastern Poland. Russ J Ecol. 2010;41: 197–200.
Norrdahl K, Korpimäki E. Effects of predator removal on vertebrate prey populations: birds of prey and small mammals. Oecologia. 1995;103: 241–248. doi: 10.1007/BF00329086 PubMed DOI
Muñoz-Pedreros A, Gil C, Yáñez J, Rau JR, Möller P. Trophic ecology of two raptors, Barn Owl (Tyto alba) and White-tailed Kite (Elanus leucurus), and possible implications for biological control of Hantavirus reservoir in Chile. Wilson J Ornithol. 2016;128: 391–403.
Poirazidis K. Systematic Raptor Monitoring as conservation tool: 12 year results in the light of landscape changes in Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli National Park. Nat Conserv. 2017;22: 17–50.
McClure CJW, Westrip JRS, Johnson JA, Schulwitz SE, Virani MZ, Davies R, et al.. State of the world’s raptors: Distributions, threats, and conservation recommendations. Biol Conserv. 2018;227: 390–402.
Šťastný K, Bejček V., Němec M. Červený seznam ptáků České republiky, Příroda 2017;34: 108–154. Available from: https://www.ochranaprirody.cz/res/archive/372/058764.pdf?seek=1509546812
Anderson DL. Landscape heterogeneity and diurnal raptor diversity in Honduras: the role of indigenous shifting cultivation. Biotropica. 2001;33: 511–519.
Bevanger K. Bird interactions with utility structures: Collision and electric shock injuries, causes and mitigating measures. Ibis. 2008;136: 412–425.
Guil F, Fernández-Olalla M, Moreno-Opo R, Mosqueda I, Gómez ME, Aranda A, et al.. Minimising mortality in endangered raptors due to power lines: the importance of spatial aggregation to optimize the application of mitigation measures. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e28212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028212 PubMed DOI PMC
Kolnegari M, Conway GJ, Basiri AA, Panter CT, Hazrati M, Rafiee MS, et al.. Electrical components involved in avian-caused outages in Iran. Bird Conserv Int. 2021;31: 364–378.
Hager SB. Human-related threats to urban raptors. J Raptor Res. 2009;43: 210–226.
Grenda T, Kukier E, Goldsztejn M, Kozieł N, Kwiatek K. Botulism: Current problem in veterinary medicine. Med weter. 2016;72: 152–156.
Hong SY, Morrissey C, Lin HS, Lin KS, Lin WL, Yao CT, et al.. Frequent detection of anticoagulant rodenticides in raptors sampled in Taiwan reflects government rodent control policy. Sci Total Environ. 2019;691: 1051–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.076 PubMed DOI
Hughes J, Sharp E, Taylor MJ, Melton L, Hartley G. Monitoring agricultural rodenticide use and secondary exposure of raptors in Scotland. Ecotoxicology. 2013;22: 974–984. doi: 10.1007/s10646-013-1074-9 PubMed DOI
Pain DJ, Amiardtriquet C. Lead poisoning of raptors in France and elsewhere. Ecotox Environ Safe. 1993;25: 183–192. doi: 10.1006/eesa.1993.1017 PubMed DOI
Dietrich DR, Schmid P, Zweifel U, Schlatter Ch, Jenni-Eiermann S, Bachmann H, et al.. Mortality of birds of prey following field application of granular carbofuran: a case study. Arch Environ Con Tox. 1995; 29: 140–145.
Vyas NB, Spann JW, Hulse CS, Bauer W, Olson S. Carbofuran detected on weathered raptor carcass feet. Wild Soc Bull. 2005;33: 1178–1182.
Hanson M, Hollingshead N, Schuler K, Siemer WF, Martin P, Bunting EM. Species, causes, and outcomes of wildlife rehabilitation in New York State. PLoS ONE. 2021;16: e0257675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257675 PubMed DOI PMC
Panter CT, Allen S, Backhouse N, Mullineaux E, Rose C, Amar A. Causes, temporal trends, and the effects of urbanization on admissions of wild raptors to rehabilitation centers in England and Wales. Ecol Evol. 2022;12: e8856. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8856 PubMed DOI PMC
Rodríguez B, Rodríguez A, Siverio F, Siverio M. Causes of raptor admissions to a wildlife rehabilitation center in Tenerife (Canary Islands). J Raptor Res. 2010;44: 30–39.
Wendell MD, Sleeman JM, Kratz G. Retrospective study of morbidity and mortality of raptors admitted to Colorado State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital during 1995 to 1998. J Wildl Dis. 2002;38: 101–106. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-38.1.101 PubMed DOI
Schenk AN, Souza MJ. Major anthropogenic causes for and outcomes of wild animal presentation to a wildlife clinic in East Tennessee, USA, 2000–2011. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e93517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093517 PubMed DOI PMC
Smallwood JA, Causey MF, Mossop DH, Klucsarits JR, Robertson B, Robertson S, et al.. Why are American Kestrel (Falco sparverius) populations declining in North America? Evidence from Nest-Box Programs. J Raptor Res. 2009;43: 274–282.
Hakkarainen H, Korpimaki E. Competitive and predatory interactions among raptors: an observational and experimental study. Ecology. 1996;77: 1134–1142.
Maphalala MI, Monadjem A, Bildstein KL, Hoffman B, Downs C. Causes of admission to a raptor rehabilitation centre and factors that can be used to predict the likelihood of release. Afr J Ecol. 2021;59: 510–517.
Planillo A, Kramer-Schadt S, Malo JE. Transport infrastructure shapes foraging habitat in a raptor community. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0118604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118604 PubMed DOI PMC
Cococcetta C, Coutant T, Collarile T, Vetere A, Di Ianni F, Huynh M. Causes of raptor admission to the wildlife rehabilitation centre in Abruzzo (central Italy) from 2005–2016. Animals. 2022;12: 1916. doi: 10.3390/ani12151916 PubMed DOI PMC
Komnenou AT, Georgopoulou I, Savvas I, Dessiris A. A retrospective study of presentation, treatment, and outcome of free-ranging raptors in Greece (1997–2000). J Zoo Wildl Med. 2005;36: 222–228. doi: 10.1638/04-061.1 PubMed DOI
Molina-López RA, Casal J, Darwich L. Causes of morbidity in wild raptor populations admitted at a wildlife rehabilitation centre in Spain from 1995–2007: a long term retrospective study. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e24603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024603 PubMed DOI PMC
Fix AS, Barrows SZ. Raptors rehabilitated in Iowa during 1986 and 1987: a retrospective study. J Wildl Dis. 1990;26: 18–21. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-26.1.18 PubMed DOI
Rubolini D, Gustin M, Bogliani G, Garavaglia R. Birds and powerlines in Italy: an assessment. Bird Conserv Int. 2005;15: 131–145.
Dwyer JF. Electric shock injuries in a Harri’s Hawk population. J Raptor Res. 2006;40: 193–199.
Janss GFE. Avian mortality from power lines: a morphologic approach of a species-specific mortality. Biol Conserv. 2000;95: 353–359.
Dixon A, Maming R, Gunga A, Purev-Ochir G, Batbayar N. The problem of raptor electric shock injuries in Asia: case studies from Mongolia and China. Bird Conserv Int. 2013;23: 520–529.
Dwyer JF, Harness RE, Donohue K. Predictive model of avian electric shock injuries risk on overhead power lines. Conserv Biol. 2014;28: 159–168. PubMed
Tavecchia G, Adrover J, Navarro AM, Pradel R. Modelling mortality causes in longitudinal data in the presence of tag loss: application to raptor poisoning and electric shock injuries: mortality processes in longitudinal data. J Appl Ecol. 2012;49: 297–305.
Hernandez CL, Oster SC, Newbrey JL. Retrospective study of raptors treated at the southeastern raptor center in AUBURN, Alabama. J Raptor Res. 2018;52: 379–388.
Zoubi MYA, Hamidan NA, Baker MAA, Amr Z. Causes of raptor admissions to rehabilitation in Jordan. J Raptor Res. 2020;54: 273–278.
Di Vittorio M, Grenci S, La Grua G, Bucalo C, Scuderi A, Palazzolo F, et al.. Release and readoption of a rescued nestling Bonelli’s Eagle (Aquila Fasciata). J Raptor Res. 2015;49: 103–105.
Literak I, Mraz J. Adoptions of young Common Buzzards in White-tailed Sea Eagle nests. Wilson J Ornithol. 2011;123: 174–176.
Mitchell AM, Wellicome TI, Brodie D, Cheng KM. Captive-reared burrowing owls show higher site-affinity, survival, and reproductive performance when reintroduced using a soft-release. Biol Conserv. 2011;144: 1382–1391.
Tetzlaff SJ, Sperry JH, DeGregorio BA. Effects of antipredator training, environmental enrichment, and soft release on wildlife translocations: A review and meta-analysis. Biol Conserv. 2019;236: 324–331.
Wanless RM, Cunningham J, Hockey PAR, Wanless J, White RW, Wiseman R. The success of a soft-release reintroduction of the flightless Aldabra rail (Dryolimnas [cuvieri] aldabranus) on Aldabra Atoll, Seychelles. Biol Conserv. 2002;107: 203–210.
Limiñana R, Arroyo B, Terraube J, McGrady M, Mougeot F. Using satellite telemetry and environmental niche modelling to inform conservation targets for a long-distance migratory raptor in its wintering grounds. Oryx. 2015;49: 329–337.
Jones MP. Behavioral aspects of captive birds of prey. Vet Clin N Am: Exot Anim Pract. 2001;4: 613–632. doi: 10.1016/s1094-9194(17)30026-9 PubMed DOI
Kumar N, Gupta U, Jhala YV, Qureshi Q, Gosler AG, Sergio F. GPS-telemetry unveils the regular high-elevation crossing of the Himalayas by a migratory raptor: implications for definition of a “Central Asian Flyway”. Sci Rep. 2020;10: 15988. PubMed PMC