A novel labeling modality of intra-abdominal lesions with Magseed magnetic marker and extirpation by Sentimag probe navigation
Jazyk angličtina Země Brazílie Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36629655
PubMed Central
PMC9937617
DOI
10.1590/1806-9282.20221129
PII: S0104-42302023005016208
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- břišní dutina * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetické jevy MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie MeSH
- pozitronová emisní tomografie * MeSH
- radioisotopová scintigrafie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate our experience with the use of Magseed, the magnetic metallic marker, as a localization technique followed by Sentimag probe detection in patients with solitary intra-abdominal local metastases with subsequent resection of the lesions. METHODS: Five patients underwent resection after the lesion was marked with the Magseed magnetic marker. Prior to the surgery, a computed tomography scan of the chest and abdomen and/or positron emission tomography was performed to rule out the dissemination of the disease. The indication for surgery was evaluated in a meeting of a multidisciplinary team, and the placement of the magnetic marker under computed tomography control had been performed the day before the planned procedure. RESULTS: The present preliminary outcomes have revealed that Magseed might be a promising technique that is feasible and safe, particularly when the postsurgical anatomic conditions in the abdominal cavity are altered and the lesions are not visible or palpable. Surgical extirpation of lesions occurred without complications in each case. In all the cases, the resection was complete and curative, and one wound infection in all (20%), without any major complications, had occurred. The mean hospital stay was 6.6 days. CONCLUSION: Magseed utilization, as a localization technique, followed by Sentimag probe detection in intra-abdominal tumors has not been reported before. Improving the visualization and, consequently, the precise marking of the lesion with subsequent radical removal can prevent insufficient or excessive removal of healthy tissue, leading to a faster diagnosis and better overall clinical outcomes.
Giresun University Faculty of Medicine Department of Pathology Giresun Turkey
Giresun University Faculty of Medicine Department of Surgery Giresun Turkey
Giresun University Faculty of Medicine Division of Endocrine Surgery Giresun Turkey
Tomas Bata University in Zlin Faculty of Humanities Zlin Czech Republic
University Hospital Ostrava Department of General Surgery Ostrava Czech Republic
University Hospital Ostrava Department of Imaging Methods Ostrava Czech Republic
University of Ostrava Faculty of Medicine Department of Imaging Methods Ostrava Czech Republic
University of Ostrava Faculty of Medicine Department of Surgical Studies Ostrava Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Hersi AF, Eriksson S, Ramos J, Abdsaleh S, Wärnberg F, Karakatsanis A. A combined, totally magnetic technique with a magnetic marker for non-palpable tumour localization and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(4):544–549. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.10.064. PubMed DOI
Finelli A, Ismaila N, Bro B, Durack J, Eggener S, Evans A, et al. Management of small renal masses: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(6):668–680. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9645. PubMed DOI
White SB. Value in interventional radiology: achieving high quality outcomes at a lower cost. Radiology. 2020;297(2):482–483. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020203407. PubMed DOI
Solomon SB, Cornelis F. Interventional molecular imaging. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(4):493–496. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.161190. PubMed DOI PMC
Sengul I, Sengul D. Blurred lines for management of thyroid nodules in the era of AUS/FLUS: novel subdivisions of category IIIA and IIIB in a possible forthcoming TBSRTC, 3rd ed.; amending vs. unnecessary? Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2021;67(10):1385–1386. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20210763. PubMed DOI
Sengul I, Sengul D. Proposal of a novel terminology: minimally invasive FNA and Thyroid minimally invasive FNA; MIFNA and Thyroid MIFNA. Ann Ital Chir. 2021;92:330–331. PubMed
Sengul I, Sengul D. Big gain, no pain: Thyroid minimally invasive FNA (Thy MIFNA); Proposal of novelty in terminology. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2021;67(12):1749–1750. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20210922. PubMed DOI
Sengul D, Sengul I, Soares JM., Júnior Repercussion of thyroid dysfunctions in thyroidology on the reproductive system: Conditio sine qua non? Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2022;68(6):721–722. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220255. PubMed DOI PMC
Sengul I, Sengul D, Veiga ECA. Revisiting optimal needle size for thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology: Not much finer, less non-diagnostic? Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2021;67(9):1213–1214. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20210671. PubMed DOI
Tsoumakidou G, Saltiel S, Villard N, Duran R, Meuwly JY, Denys A. Image-guided marking techniques in interventional radiology: A review of current evidence. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2021;102(12):699–707. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2021.07.002. PubMed DOI
Shimohigashi Y, Toya R, Saito T, Ikeda O, Maruyama M, Yonemura K, et al. Tumor motion changes in stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver tumors: an evaluation based on four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography and fiducial markers. Radiat Oncol. 2017;12(1):61–61. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0799-7. PubMed DOI PMC
Pereira PL, Fritz J, Koenig CW, Maurer F, Boehm P, Badke A, et al. Preoperative marking of musculoskeletal tumors guided by magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(8):1761–1767. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200408000-00021. PubMed DOI
Reitsamer R, Peintinger F, Forsthuber E, Sir A. The applicability of Magseed® for targeted axillary dissection in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast. 2021;57:113–117. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.03.008. PubMed DOI PMC
Chojniak R, Isberner RK, Viana LM, Yu LS, Aita AA, Soares FA. Computed tomography guided needle biopsy: experience from 1,300 procedures. Sao Paulo Med J. 2006;124(1):10–14. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802006000100003. PubMed DOI PMC
McGill DB, Rakela J, Zinsmeister AR, Ott BJ. A 21-year experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. Gastroenterology. 1990;99(5):1396–1400. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91167-5. PubMed DOI
Smith EH. Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Review. Radiology. 1991;178(1):253–258. doi: 10.1148/radiology.178.1.1984314. PubMed DOI
Al-Ghamdi ASG. In: Liver biopsy [Internet] Takahashi H, editor. London: IntechOpen; 2011. Complications of liver biopsy; pp. 363–370.
Campbell MS, Jeffers LJ, Reddy KR. In: Schiff's Diseases of the Liver. 10th ed. Schiff ER, Sorrell MF, Maddrey WC, editors. Philadelphia: Lippincott William & Wilkins; 2007. Liver biopsy and laparoscopy; pp. 61–81.
Simons JM, Scoggins ME, Kuerer HM, Krishnamurthy S, Yang WT, Sahin AA, et al. Prospective registry trial assessing the use of magnetic seeds to locate clipped nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(8):4277–4283. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09542-y. PubMed DOI