Accelerated partial breast irradiation using sole interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy compared with whole-breast irradiation with boost for early breast cancer: 10-year results of a GEC-ESTRO randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

. 2023 Mar ; 24 (3) : 262-272. [epub] 20230201

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu randomizované kontrolované studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid36738756
Odkazy

PubMed 36738756
DOI 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00018-9
PII: S1470-2045(23)00018-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: Several randomised, phase 3 trials have investigated the value of different techniques of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) for patients with early breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery compared with whole-breast irradiation. In a phase 3 randomised trial, we evaluated whether APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy is non-inferior compared with whole-breast irradiation. Here, we present the 10-year follow-up results. METHODS: We did a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial at 16 hospitals and medical centres in Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Spain, and Switzerland. Patients aged 40 years or older with early invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery were centrally randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either whole-breast irradiation or APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy. Whole-breast irradiation was delivered in 25 daily fractions of 50 Gy over 5 weeks, with a supplemental boost of 10 Gy to the tumour bed, and APBI was delivered as 30·1 Gy (seven fractions) and 32·0 Gy (eight fractions) of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in 5 days or as 50 Gy of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy over 5 treatment days. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was ipsilateral local recurrence, analysed in the as-treated population; the non-inferiority margin for the recurrence rate difference (defined for 5-year results) was 3 percentage points. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00402519; the trial is complete. FINDINGS: Between April 20, 2004, and July 30, 2009, 1328 female patients were randomly assigned to whole breast irradiation (n=673) or APBI (n=655), of whom 551 in the whole-breast irradiation group and 633 in the APBI group were eligible for analysis. At a median follow-up of 10·36 years (IQR 9·12-11·28), the 10-year local recurrence rates were 1·58% (95% CI 0·37 to 2·8) in the whole-breast irradiation group and 3·51% (1·99 to 5·03) in the APBI group. The difference in 10-year rates between the groups was 1·93% (95% CI -0·018 to 3·87; p=0·074). Adverse events were mostly grade 1 and 2, in 234 (60%) of 393 participants in the whole-breast irradiation group and 314 (67%) of 470 participants in the APBI group, at 7·5-year or 10-year follow-up, or both. Patients in the APBI group had a significantly lower incidence of treatment-related grade 3 late side-effects than those in the whole-breast irradiation group (17 [4%] of 393 for whole-breast irradiation vs seven [1%] of 470 for APBI; p=0·021; at 7·5-year or 10-year follow-up, or both). At 10 years, the most common type of grade 3 adverse event in both treatment groups was fibrosis (six [2%] of 313 patients for whole-breast irradiation and three [1%] of 375 patients for APBI, p=0·56). No grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related deaths have been observed. INTERPRETATION: Postoperative APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy after breast-conserving surgery in patients with early breast cancer is a valuable alternative to whole-breast irradiation in terms of treatment efficacy and is associated with fewer late side-effects. FUNDING: German Cancer Aid, Germany.

Brachytherapy Department Centrum Onkologii Instytut im Marii Skł odowskej Warsaw Poland

Brachytherapy Department Centrum Onkologii Instytut im Marii Skł odowskej Warsaw Poland; Podkarpacki Hospital Cancer Center Brzozów Brzozów Poland

Center of Radiotherapy National Institute of Oncology Budapest Hungary; Department of Oncology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

Department of Medical Informatics Biometry and Epidemiology University Erlangen Nuremberg Nuremberg Germany

Department of Radiation Oncology Catalan Institute of Oncology Barcelona Spain

Department of Radiation Oncology Hospital Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg Regensburg Germany

Department of Radiation Oncology Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Brno Czech Republic

Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital AKH Wien Vienna Austria

Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Bern Inselspital Bern Switzerland

Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Erlangen and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen EMN Erlangen Germany

Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Erlangen and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen EMN Erlangen Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Rostock Rostock Germany

Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Kiel Kiel Germany

Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Kiel Kiel Germany; Department of Radiotherapy Sana Clinic Offenbach Germany

Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig Germany

Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Rostock Rostock Germany

Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Rostock Rostock Germany

Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany

Department of Radiation Oncology Valencian Institute of Oncology Valencia Valencia Spain

Komentář v

PubMed

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT00402519

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...