Impact of Performance Status on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu metaanalýza, systematický přehled, časopisecké články, přehledy, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
36774273
DOI
10.1016/j.euf.2023.01.019
PII: S2405-4569(23)00037-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Immune checkpoint inhibitor, Performance status, Urothelial carcinoma,
- MeSH
- inhibitory kontrolních bodů terapeutické užití MeSH
- karcinom z přechodných buněk * farmakoterapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * farmakoterapie MeSH
- proporcionální rizikové modely MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
- Názvy látek
- inhibitory kontrolních bodů MeSH
CONTEXT: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in the management of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). However, its performance in aUC patients with poor performance status (PS) remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the impact of patients' performance status on the oncologic outcomes in patients with aUC treated with ICIs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception until July 2022 to identify studies assessing the association between the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS and the oncologic outcomes in patients with aUC treated with ICIs in randomised (RCTs) and nonrandomised (NRCTs) control studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The outcomes of our interests were overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall, six RCTs comprising 5428 patients and 32 NRCTs comprising 6069 patients were included. The meta-analysis of the RCTs revealed that patients with ECOG PS = 0 and PS ≥1 had a trend towards better OS with ICIs compared with those treated with chemotherapy (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-1.04, and HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.53-1.03, respectively). There was no significant difference in terms of response to ICIs between patients with poor and good PS (I2 = 0%, p = 0.46). The meta-analysis of the NRCTs revealed that patients with PS ≥2 had significantly worse OS than those with PS <2 (pooled HR: 2.52, 95% CI: 2.00-3.17), as well as worse CSS (pooled HR: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.90-5.91), PFS (pooled HR: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.67-5.01), and ORR (pooled odds ratio: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.27-0.82). Similarly, patients with PS ≥1 had significantly worse oncologic outcomes than those with PS = 0. CONCLUSIONS: In the NRCTs, poor PS was correlated with worse oncologic outcomes in aUC patients treated with ICIs. In the RCTs, ICIs performed better than chemotherapy across all PS categories. These findings should be interpreted with caution due to the high heterogeneity across the studies and patient populations. More RCTs including poor PS are needed to assess the impact of PS on ICI therapy outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: Immune therapy for patients with urothelial carcinoma should not be restricted on the grounds of performance status. However, patients with poor performance status should be considered for other factors such as life expectancy and comorbidities.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
