BACKGROUND: The recent development of three-dimensional (3D) technologies introduces a novel set of opportunities to the medical field in general, and specifically to surgery. The preoperative phase has proven to be a critical factor in surgical success. Utilization of 3D technologies has the potential to improve preoperative planning and overall surgical outcomes. In this narrative review article, the authors describe existing clinical data pertaining to the current use of 3D printing, virtual reality, and augmented reality in the preoperative phase of bone surgery. METHODS: The methodology included keyword-based literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar for original articles published between 2014 and 2022. After excluding studies performed in nonbone surgery disciplines, data from 61 studies of five different surgical disciplines were processed to be included in this narrative review. RESULTS: Among the mentioned technologies, 3D printing is currently the most advanced in terms of clinical use, predominantly creating anatomical models and patient-specific instruments that provide high-quality operative preparation. Virtual reality allows to set a surgical plan and to further simulate the procedure via a 2D screen or head mounted display. Augmented reality is found to be useful for surgical simulation upon 3D printed anatomical models or virtual phantoms. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 3D technologies are gradually becoming an integral part of a surgeon's preoperative toolbox, allowing for increased surgical accuracy and reduction of operation time, mainly in complex and unique surgical cases. This may eventually lead to improved surgical outcomes, thereby optimizing the personalized surgical approach.

1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Prague Czechia

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery

Levin Center of 3D Printing and Surgical Innovation

National Unit of Orthopedic Oncology

Office of the Deputy Medical Manager Tel Aviv Medical Center Tel Aviv Israel

Sackler School of Medicine Tel Aviv University

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Mussi E, Mussa F, Santarelli C, et al. . Current practice in preoperative virtual and physical simulation in neurosurgery. Bioengineering (Basel) 2020;7:1–7. PubMed PMC

Hak DJ, Rose J, Stahel PF. Preoperative planning in orthopedic trauma: benefits and contemporary uses. Orthopedics 2010;33:581–4. PubMed

Sodhi N, Anis HK, Coste M, et al. . A nationwide analysis of preoperative planning on operative times and postoperative complications in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2019;32:1040–5. PubMed

Wesolowski JR, Lev MH. CT: history, technology, and clinical aspects. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2005;26:376–9. PubMed

Geva T. Magnetic resonance imaging: historical perspective. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8:573–80. PubMed

Rybicki FJ, Grant GT. 3D Printing in Medicine. Springer International Publishing; 2017.

Mishra A, Verma T, Vaish A, et al. . Virtual preoperative planning and 3D printing are valuable for the management of complex orthopaedic trauma. Chin J Traumatol 2019;22:350–5. PubMed PMC

Wake N, Alexander AE, Christensen AM, et al. . Creating patient-specific anatomical models for 3D printing and AR/VR: a supplement for the 2018 Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) hands-on course. 3D Print Med 2019;5:1–17. PubMed PMC

Wang D, Ma D, Wong ML, et al. . Recent advances in surgical planning & navigation for tumor biopsy and resection. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2015;5:640–8. PubMed PMC

Yi ZQ, Li L, Mo DP, et al. . Preoperative surgical planning and simulation of complex cranial base tumors in virtual reality. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008;121:1134–6. PubMed

Inserra A, Borro L, Spada M, et al. . Advanced 3D “Modeling” and “Printing” for the surgical planning of a successful case of thoraco-omphalopagus conjoined twins separation. Front Physiol 2020;11:566766. PubMed PMC

Small T, Krebs V, Molloy R, et al. . Comparison of acetabular shell position using patient specific instruments vs. standard surgical instruments: a randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty 2014;29:1030–7. PubMed

Chopra S, Boro AK, Sinha VD. 3D printing-assisted skull base tumor surgeries: an institutional experience. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2021;12:630–4. PubMed PMC

Lador R, Regev G, Salame K, et al. . Use of 3-dimensional printing technology in complex spine surgeries. World Neurosurg 2020;133:e327–e41. PubMed

Cartiaux O, Paul L, Francq BG, et al. . Improved accuracy with 3D planning and patient-specific instruments during simulated pelvic bone tumor surgery. Ann Biomed Eng 2014;42:205–13. PubMed

Li J, Gsaxner C, Pepe A, et al. . Synthetic skull bone defects for automatic patient-specific craniofacial implant design. Sci Data 2021;8:1–36. PubMed PMC

Sutherland J, Belec J, Sheikh A, et al. . Applying modern virtual and augmented reality technologies to medical images and models. J Digit Imaging 2019;32:38–53. PubMed PMC

Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, et al. . The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2017;10:549–59. PubMed

Bradley D, Willson T, Chang JB, et al. . Intraoperative three-dimensional virtual reality and computed tomographic guidance in temporomandibular joint arthroplasty of syndromic craniofacial dysostoses. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019;7:e2388. PubMed PMC

Alshomer F, Alazzam A, Alturki A, et al. . Smartphone-assisted augmented reality in craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021;9:e3743. PubMed PMC

Morgan EF, Unnikrisnan GU, Hussein AI. Bone mechanical properties in healthy and diseased states. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 2018;20:119–43. PubMed PMC

Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, et al. . 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online 2016;15:1–115. PubMed PMC

Chen C, Cai L, Zheng W, et al. . The efficacy of using 3D printing models in the treatment of fractures: a randomised clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019;20:1–65. PubMed PMC

Maini L, Sharma A, Jha S, et al. . Three-dimensional printing and patient-specific pre-contoured plate: future of acetabulum fracture fixation?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2018;44:215–24. PubMed

You W, Liu LJ, Chen HX, et al. . Application of 3D printing technology on the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures (Neer3-part and 4-part) in old people. Orthop Traumatol 2016;102:897–903. PubMed

De Vloo R, Pellikaan P, Dhollander A, et al. . Three-dimensional analysis of accuracy of component positioning in total knee arthroplasty with patient specific and conventional instruments: a randomized controlled trial. Knee 2017;24:1469–77. PubMed

Sun ML, Zhang Y, Peng Y, et al. . Accuracy of a novel 3D‐printed patient‐specific intramedullary guide to control femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Surg 2020;12:429–41. PubMed PMC

Zhang Y, Rao Z, Zhang J, et al. . 3D printed guides and preoperative planning for uncemented stem anteversion reconstruction during hip arthroplasty: a pilot study. Biomed Res Int 2021;2021:6621882. PubMed PMC

Gouin F, Paul L, Odri GA, et al. . Computer-assisted planning and patient-specific instruments for bone tumor resection within the pelvis: a series of 11 patients. Sarcoma 2014;2014:1–9. PubMed PMC

Maini L, Verma T, Sharma A, et al. . Evaluation of accuracy of virtual surgical planning for patient-specific pre-contoured plate in acetabular fracture fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2018;138:495–504. PubMed

Chen K, Yang F, Yao S, et al. . Application of computer-assisted virtual surgical procedures and three-dimensional printing of patient-specific pre-contoured plates in bicolumnar acetabular fracture fixation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019;105:877–84. PubMed

Jiang M, Coles-Black J, Chen G, et al. . 3D printed patient-specific complex hip arthroplasty models streamline the preoperative surgical workflow: a pilot study. Front Surg 2021;8:687379. PubMed PMC

Li Q, Chen X, Lin B, et al. . Three-dimensional technology assisted trabecular metal cup and augments positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with complex acetabular defects. J Orthop Surg Res 2019;14:431. PubMed PMC

Tetsworth K, Block S, Glatt V. Putting 3D modelling and 3D printing into practice: virtual surgery and preoperative planning to reconstruct complex post-traumatic skeletal deformities and defects. SICOT J 2017;3:16. PubMed PMC

Mishra A, Verma T, Rajkumar, et al. . 3D printed patient-specific acetabular jig for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop 2020;54:174–80. PubMed PMC

Knafo Y, Houfani F, Zaharia B, et al. . Value of 3D preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty based on biplanar weightbearing radiographs. Biomed Res Int 2019;2019:1932191. PubMed PMC

Di Laura A, Henckel J, Hothi H, et al. . Can 3D surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? A prospective study. 3D Print Med 2020;6:1–25. PubMed PMC

Sariali E, Boukhelifa N, Catonne Y, et al. . Comparison of three-dimensional planning-assisted and conventional acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016;98:108–16. PubMed

Werner BS, Hudek R, Burkhart KJ, et al. . The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017;26:1477–83. PubMed

Min KS, Fox HM, Bedi A, et al. . Patient-specific planning in shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2020;102-B:365–70. PubMed

Frizziero L, Santi GM, Liverani A, et al. . Computer-aided surgical simulation for correcting complex limb deformities in children. Appl Sci 2020;10:5181.

Lam KY, Mark CWM, Yee SY. Office 3D-printing in paediatric orthopaedics: the orthopaedic surgeon’s guide. Transl Pediatr 2021;10:474–84. PubMed PMC

Shelton TJ, Monazzam S, Calafi A, et al. . Preoperative 3D modeling and printing for guiding periacetabular osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop 2021;41:149–58. PubMed

Gigi R, Gortzak Y, Barriga Moreno J, et al. . 3D-printed cutting guides for lower limb deformity correction in the young population. J Pediatr Orthop 2022;42:e427–e34. PubMed

Tan LA, Yerneni K, Tuchman A, et al. . Utilization of the 3D-printed spine model for freehand pedicle screw placement in complex spinal deformity correction. J Spine Surg 2018;4:319–27. PubMed PMC

Xiao J-R, Huang W-D, Yang X-H, et al. . En bloc resection of primary malignant bone tumor in the cervical spine based on 3-dimensional printing technology. Orthop Surg 2016;8:171–8. PubMed PMC

Jia X, Zhang K, Qiang M, et al. . Association of computer-assisted virtual preoperative planning with postoperative mortality and complications in older patients with intertrochanteric hip fracture. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e205830. PubMed PMC

Tu Q, Chen H, Ding H-W, et al. . Three-dimensional printing technology for surgical correction of congenital scoliosis caused by hemivertebrae. World Neurosurg 2021;149:e969–e81. PubMed

Zawy Alsofy S, Stroop R, Fusek I, et al. . Virtual reality-based evaluation of surgical planning and outcome of monosegmental, unilateral cervical foraminal stenosis. World Neurosurg 2019;129:e857–e65. PubMed

Zawy Alsofy S, Nakamura M, Ewelt C, et al. . Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive and open monosegmental lumbar fusion, and impact of virtual reality on surgical planning and strategy. J Neurol Surg Part A 2021;82:399–409. PubMed

Zheng C, Li J, Zeng G, et al. . Development of a virtual reality preoperative planning system for postlateral endoscopic lumbar discectomy surgery and its clinical application. World Neurosurg 2019;123:e1–e8. PubMed

Salvatore SD, Vadalà G, Oggiano L, et al. . Virtual reality in preoperative planning of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using Google Cardboard. Neurospine 2021;18:199–205. PubMed PMC

Hou Y, Shi J, Lin Y, et al. . Virtual surgery simulation versus traditional approaches in training of residents in cervical pedicle screw placement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2018;138:777–82. PubMed

Xin B, Huang X, Wan W, et al. . The efficacy of immersive virtual reality surgical simulator training for pedicle screw placement: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Int Orthop 2020;44:927–34. PubMed

Hou Y, Lin Y, Shi J, et al. . Effectiveness of the thoracic pedicle screw placement using the virtual surgical training system: a cadaver study. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018;15:677–85. PubMed

Jo Y-J, Choi J-S, Kim J, et al. . Virtual reality (VR) simulation and augmented reality (AR) navigation in orthognathic surgery: a case report. Appl Sci 2021;11:5673.

Kim H-J, Jo Y-J, Choi J-S, et al. . Virtual reality simulation and augmented reality-guided surgery for total maxillectomy: a case report. Appl Sci 2020;10:6288.

Gao Y, Lin L, Chai G, et al. . A feasibility study of a new method to enhance the augmented reality navigation effect in mandibular angle split osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019;47:1242–8. PubMed

Jiang W, Ma L, Zhang B, et al. . Evaluation of the 3D augmented reality-guided intraoperative positioning of dental implants in edentulous mandibular models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:1219–28. PubMed

Zaragoza-Siqueiros J, Medellin-Castillo HI, de la Garza-Camargo H, et al. . An integrated haptic-enabled virtual reality system for orthognathic surgery planning. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2019;22:499–517. PubMed

Tang ZN, Hui Y, Hu LH, et al. . Application of mixed reality technique for the surgery of oral and maxillofacial tumors. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2020;52:1124–9. PubMed PMC

Koyachi M, Sugahara K, Odaka K, et al. . Accuracy of Le Fort I osteotomy with combined computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technology and mixed reality. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;50:782–90. PubMed

Tel A, Sembronio S, Costa F, et al. . Scoping zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures with the eyes of virtual reality: operative protocol and proposal of a modernized classification. J Craniofac Surg 2021;32:552–8. PubMed

Huang C, Zeng W, Chen J, et al. . The combined application of augmented reality and guide template technology in the treatment of nasal deformities. J Craniofac Surg 2021;32:2431–4. PubMed

Han W, Yang X, Wu S, et al. . A new method for cranial vault reconstruction: augmented reality in synostotic plagiocephaly surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019;47:1280–4. PubMed

Gao Y, Liu K, Lin L, et al. . Use of augmented reality navigation to optimise the surgical management of craniofacial fibrous dysplasia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;60:162–167. PubMed

Yamazaki A, Ito T, Sugimoto M, et al. . Patient-specific virtual and mixed reality for immersive, experiential anatomy education and for surgical planning in temporal bone surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 2021;48:1081–91. PubMed

Filimonov A, Zeiger J, Goldrich D, et al. . Virtual reality surgical planning for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the craniovertebral junction. Am J Otolaryngol 2022;43:103219. PubMed

Timonen T, Dietz A, Linder P, et al. . The effect of virtual reality on temporal bone anatomy evaluation and performance. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021;279:4303–4312. PubMed PMC

Ghizoni E, De Souza JPSAS, Raposo-Amaral CE, et al. . 3D-printed craniosynostosis model: new simulation surgical tool. World Neurosurg 2018;109:356–61. PubMed

Guo X-Y, He Z-Q, Duan H, et al. . The utility of 3-dimensional-printed models for skull base meningioma surgery. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:370. PubMed PMC

Lin J, Zhou Z, Guan J, et al. . Using three-dimensional printing to create individualized cranial nerve models for skull base tumor surgery. World Neurosurg 2018;120:e142–e52. PubMed

Louis RG, Steinberg GK, Duma C, et al. . Early experience with virtual and synchronized augmented reality platform for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation: a case series. Oper Neurosurg 2021;21:189–96. PubMed PMC

Zawy Alsofy S, Nakamura M, Suleiman A, et al. . Cerebral anatomy detection and surgical planning in patients with anterior skull base meningiomas using a virtual reality technique. J Clin Med 2021;10:681. PubMed PMC

Sun G-C, Chen X-L, Hou Y-Z, et al. . Image-guided endoscopic surgery for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hematoma. J Neurosurg 2017;127:537–42. PubMed

Zawy Alsofy S, Welzel Saravia H, Nakamura M, et al. . Virtual reality-based evaluation of neurovascular conflict for the surgical planning of microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia patients. Neurosurg Rev 2021;44:3309–21. PubMed

Su XH, Deng Z, He BW, et al. . Haptic‐based virtual reality simulator for lateral ventricle puncture operation. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 2020;16:1–10. PubMed

Incekara F, Smits M, Dirven C, et al. . Clinical feasibility of a wearable mixed-reality device in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 2018;118:e422–e7. PubMed

Ivan ME, Eichberg DG, Di L, et al. . Augmented reality head-mounted display-based incision planning in cranial neurosurgery: a prospective pilot study. Neurosurg Focus 2021;51:E3. PubMed

Shu X-J, Wang Y, Xin H, et al. . Real-time augmented reality application in presurgical planning and lesion scalp localization by a smartphone. Acta Neurochirurgic 2021;169:1069–1078. PubMed

Si W-X, Liao X-Y, Qian Y-L, et al. . Assessing performance of augmented reality-based neurosurgical training. Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art 2019;2:2–6. PubMed PMC

Coelho G, Rabelo NN, Vieira E, et al. . Augmented reality and physical hybrid model simulation for preoperative planning of metopic craniosynostosis surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2020;48:E19. PubMed

Shu XJ, Wang Y, Xin H, et al. . Real-time augmented reality application in presurgical planning and lesion scalp localization by a smartphone. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022;164:1069–78. PubMed

Frizziero S, Liverani G, Trisolino M, et al. . Paediatric orthopaedic surgery with 3D printing: improvements and cost reduction. Symmetry 2019;11:1317.

Beitler BG, Abraham PF, Glennon AR, et al. . Interpretation of regulatory factors for 3D printing at hospitals and medical centers, or at the point of care. 3D Print Med 2022;8:1–7. PubMed PMC

Wang J, Shen Y, Yang S. A practical marker-less image registration method for augmented reality oral and maxillofacial surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2019;14:763–73. PubMed

Zhang F, Chen L, Miao W, et al. . Research on accuracy of augmented reality surgical navigation system based on multi-view virtual and real registration technology. IEEE Access 2020;8:122511–28.

Andrews CM, Henry AB, Soriano IM, et al. . Registration techniques for clinical applications of three-dimensional augmented reality devices. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med 2021;9:4900214. PubMed PMC