Magnetic marker localisation in breast cancer surgery
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36817668
PubMed Central
PMC9897082
DOI
10.5114/aoms.2020.93673
PII: 110674
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- MaMaLoc, Magseed, breast cancer surgery, impalpable breast tumour, magnetic marker,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Since mammographic screening programmes were initiated, the spectrum of breast cancer has changed in terms of impalpable tumours, thus causing the development of new localisation methods, including magnetic markers. We offer herein an up-to-date review focused on two magnetic markers (Magseed, MaMaLoc) currently used in breast cancer surgery for the localisation of breast tumours or pathological axillary nodes. Magnetic marker localisation presents a safe and reliable method for breast tumour marking. Four currently available prospective studies demonstrate that the Magseed system has a negative margin rate and a successful localisation rate, both of which are comparable to standard marking systems used in breast cancer surgery. The main benefits of magnetic markers are that they require no radiation safety measures, and they offer the possibility of longer deployment times, thus simplifying surgery scheduling. The most important drawbacks are cost of the system, depth limitation and need for frequent probe recalibration.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Wyld L, Markopoulos C, Leidenius M, Senkus-Konefka E (eds.). Breast Cancer Management for Surgeons: A European Multidisciplinary Textbook. Springer International Publishing; 2018.
Patel SN, Mango VL, Jadeja P, et al. . Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Clin Imaging 2018; 47: 14-7. PubMed
Caudle AS, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S, et al. . Improved axillary evaluation following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer using selective evaluation of clipped nodes: implementation of targeted axillary dissection. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 1072-8. PubMed PMC
Spalluto LB, DeBenedectis CM, Morrow MS, Lourenco AP. Advances in breast localization techniques: an opportunity to improve quality of care and patient satisfaction. Semin Roentgenol 2018; 53: 270-9. PubMed
Cheang E, Ha R, Thornton CM, Mango VL. Innovations in image-guided preoperative breast lesion localization. Br J Radiol 2018; 91: 20170740. PubMed PMC
Jeffries DO, Dossett LA, Jorns JM. Localization for breast surgery: the next generation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017; 141: 1324-9. PubMed
Hayes MK. Update on preoperative breast localization. Radiol Clin North Am 2017; 55: 591-603. PubMed
Dash N, Chafin SH, Johnson RR, Contractor FM. Usefulness of tissue marker clips in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 911-7. PubMed
Green M, Vidya R. Techniques used to localize occult breast lesions: an update. Clin Breast Cancer 2018; 18: e281-3. PubMed
Ruiz-Delgado ML, López-Ruiz JA, Sáiz-López A. Abnormal mammography and sonography associated with foreign-body giant-cell reaction after stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with carbon marking. Acta Radiol 2008; 49: 1112-8. PubMed
Dauway EL, Saunders R, Friedland J. Innovative diagnostics for breast cancer: new frontiers for the new millennium using radioactive seed localization. Surgical forum: 85th annual American college of surgeons clinic congress. Vol. 50. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 1999.
Sharek D, Zuley ML, Zhang JY, Soran A, Ahrendt GM, Ganott MA. Radioactive seed localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204: 872-7. PubMed
Langhans L, Tvedskov TF, Klausen TL, et al. . Radioactive seed localization or wire-guided localization of nonpalpable invasive and in situ breast cancer: a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial. Ann Surg 2017; 266: 29-35. PubMed
Sung JS, King V, Thornton CM, et al. . Safety and efficacy of radioactive seed localization with I-125 prior to lumpectomy and/or excisional biopsy. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 1453-7. PubMed
Dauphine C, Reicher JJ, Reicher MA, Gondusky C, Khalkhali I, Kim M. A prospective clinical study to evaluate the safety and performance of wireless localization of nonpalpable breast lesions using radiofrequency identification technology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204: W720-3. PubMed
DiNome ML, Kusske AM, Attai DJ, Fischer CP, Hoyt AC. Microchipping the breast: an effective new technology for localizing non-palpable breast lesions for surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 175: 165-70. PubMed
Harvey JR, Lim Y, Murphy J, et al. . Safety and feasibility of breast lesion localization using magnetic seeds (Magseed): a multi-centre, open-label cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 169: 531-6. PubMed PMC
Price ER, Khoury AL, Esserman LJ, Joe BN, Alvarado MD. Initial clinical experience with an inducible magnetic seed system for preoperative breast lesion localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210: 913-7. PubMed
Pohlodek K, Foltín M, Mečiarová I, Ondriaš F. Simultaneous use of magnetic method in localization of impalpable breast cancer and sentinel lymph nodes detection: initial experience. Nanomedicine 2018; 13: 3075-81. PubMed
Hersi AF, Eriksson S, Ramos J, Abdsaleh S, Wärnberg F, Karakatsanis A. A combined, totally magnetic technique with a magnetic marker for non-palpable tumour localization and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45: 544-9. PubMed
Pilewskie M, Morrow M. Margins in breast cancer: how much is enough? Cancer 2018; 124: 1335-41. PubMed PMC
Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, et al. . Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 3219-32. PubMed
Corsi F, Sorrentino L, Bossi D, Sartani A, Foschi D. Preoperative localization and surgical margins in conservative breast surgery. Int J Surg Oncol 2013; 2013: 793819. PubMed PMC
Chacko SM, Marshall HN. Implementation of preoperative magnetic seed localization for breast and axillary lesions: an alternative to wires and radioactive seeds. J Radiol Nurs 2018; 37: 154-7.
Coufal O, Zapletal O, Gabrielová L, Fabian P, Schneiderová M. Targeted axillary dissection and sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy – a retrospective study. Rozhl Chir 2018; 97: 551-7. PubMed
Lee J, Jung JH, Kim WW, et al. . 5-year oncological outcomes of targeted axillary sampling in pT1-2N1 breast cancer. Asian J Surg 2019; 42: 681-7. PubMed
Study the Use of Magseed and Sentimag to Localize Axillary Lymph Nodes – Full Text View – ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03038152 (Accessed: 27.02.2019).
Magseed Enabled Long-Term Localization of Axillary Lymph Nodes – Full Text View – ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03796559 (Accessed: 4.02.2019).
Thill M, Kurylcio A, Welter R, et al. . The Central-European SentiMag study: sentinel lymph node biopsy with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) vs. radioisotope. Breast 2014; 23: 175-9. PubMed
Ghilli M, Carretta E, Di Filippo F, et al. . The superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer: a valid alternative in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2017; 26. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12385. PubMed DOI
Douek M, Klaase J, Monypenny I, et al. .; SentiMAG Trialists Group . Sentinel node biopsy using a magnetic tracer versus standard technique: the SentiMAG Multicentre Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21: 1237-45. PubMed
Karakatsanis A, Christiansen PM, Fischer L, et al. . The Nordic SentiMag trial: a comparison of super paramagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles versus Tc(99) and patent blue in the detection of sentinel node (SN) in patients with breast cancer and a meta-analysis of earlier studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 157: 281-94. PubMed PMC
Schermers B, van der Hage JA, Loo CE, et al. . Feasibility of magnetic marker localisation for non-palpable breast cancer. Breast 2017; 33: 50-6. PubMed
MaMaLoc: a study on the use of a magnetic marker for tumor localization in breast cancer surgery. Trialregister.nl [Internet]. Available at: https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6553 (Accessed: 27.02.2019).
Magnetic Seed (Magseed) Localisation in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Multicentre Clinical Trial