Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (CLEAR): extended follow-up from the phase 3, randomised, open-label study
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print
Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
36858721
DOI
10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00049-9
PII: S1470-2045(23)00049-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Everolimus MeSH
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell * MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Kidney Neoplasms * MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Sunitinib MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Everolimus MeSH
- lenvatinib MeSH Browser
- pembrolizumab MeSH Browser
- Sunitinib MeSH
BACKGROUND: In the primary analysis of the CLEAR study, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (data cutoff Aug 28, 2020). We aimed to assess overall survival based on 7 months of additional follow-up. METHODS: This is a protocol-prespecified updated overall survival analysis (data cutoff March 31, 2021) of the open-label, phase 3, randomised CLEAR trial. Patients with clear-cell advanced renal cell carcinoma who had not received any systemic anticancer therapy for renal cell carcinoma, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, or any systemic investigational anticancer drug, were eligible for inclusion from 200 sites (hospitals and cancer centres) across 20 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive lenvatinib (20 mg per day orally in 21-day cycles) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 21 days; lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group), lenvatinib (18 mg per day orally) plus everolimus (5 mg per day orally; lenvatinib plus everolimus group [not reported in this updated analysis]) in 21-day cycles, or sunitinib (50 mg per day orally, 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off; sunitinib group). Eligible patients were at least 18 years old with a Karnofsky performance status of 70 or higher. A computer-generated randomisation scheme was used, and stratification factors were geographical region and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center prognostic groups. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by independent imaging review according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). In this Article, extended follow-up analyses for progression-free survival and protocol-specified updated overall survival data are reported for the intention-to-treat population. No safety analyses were done at this follow-up. This study is closed to new participants and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02811861. FINDINGS: Between Oct 13, 2016, and July 24, 2019, 1417 patients were screened for inclusion in the CLEAR trial, of whom 1069 (75%; 273 [26%] female, 796 [74%] male; median age 62 years [IQR 55-69]) were randomly assigned: 355 (33%) patients (255 [72%] male and 100 [28%] female) to the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group, 357 (33%) patients (275 [77%] male and 82 [23%] female) to the sunitinib group, and 357 (33%) patients to the lenvatinib plus everolimus group (not reported in this updated analysis). Median follow-up for progression-free survival was 27·8 months (IQR 20·3-33·8) in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 19·4 months (5·5-32·5) in the sunitinib group. Median progression-free survival was 23·3 months (95% CI 20·8-27·7) in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 9·2 months (6·0-11·0) in the sunitinib group (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·42 [95% CI 0·34-0·52]). Median overall survival follow-up was 33·7 months (IQR 27·4-36·9) in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 33·4 months (26·7-36·8) in the sunitinib group. Overall survival was improved with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (median not reached [95% CI 41·5-not estimable]) versus sunitinib (median not reached [38·4-not estimable]; HR 0·72 [95% CI 0·55-0·93]). INTERPRETATION: Efficacy benefits of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab over sunitinib were durable and clinically meaningful with extended follow-up. These results support the use of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. FUNDING: Eisai and Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Biostatistics Eisai Nutley NJ USA
Clinic for Urology and Clinic for Medical Oncology University Hospital Essen Essen Germany
Clinical Research Eisai Nutley NJ USA
Clinical Research Merck Rahway NJ USA
Department of Hematology and Oncology AdventHealth Cancer Institute Orlando FL USA
Department of Medical Oncology Cross Cancer Institute University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada
Department of Medical Oncology Dana Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA
Department of Medical Oncology Texas Oncology Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center Dallas TX USA
Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
Department of Medicine University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami FL USA
Department of Onco urology P A Hertsen Moscow Cancer Research Institute Moscow Russia
Department of Urology Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan
Department of Urology University Hospital Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Munich Germany
Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine University of Bari 'A Moro' Bari Italy
Medical Oncology Department Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal Madrid Spain
State Institution of Healthcare Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary Omsk Russia
References provided by Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02811861
