Ovarian cancer pathology characteristics as predictors of variant pathogenicity in BRCA1 and BRCA2
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S., Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
UL1 TR000124
NCATS NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA128978
NCI NIH HHS - United States
20861
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
U19 CA148065
NCI NIH HHS - United States
U10 CA180822
NCI NIH HHS - United States
RC4 CA153828
NCI NIH HHS - United States
U10 CA180888
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R25 CA112486
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA260132
NCI NIH HHS - United States
U19 CA148112
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA140323
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA214545
NCI NIH HHS - United States
P30 CA008748
NCI NIH HHS - United States
23382
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
15601
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
P20 GM130423
NIGMS NIH HHS - United States
UM1 CA164920
NCI NIH HHS - United States
U10 CA180868
NCI NIH HHS - United States
22905
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
UL1 TR001881
NCATS NIH HHS - United States
U19 CA148537
NCI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
37076566
PubMed Central
PMC10241792
DOI
10.1038/s41416-023-02263-5
PII: 10.1038/s41416-023-02263-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- genetická predispozice k nemoci MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory prsu * MeSH
- nádory vaječníků * genetika MeSH
- protein BRCA1 genetika MeSH
- protein BRCA2 genetika MeSH
- virulence MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. MeSH
- Názvy látek
- BRCA1 protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
- BRCA2 protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
- protein BRCA1 MeSH
- protein BRCA2 MeSH
BACKGROUND: The distribution of ovarian tumour characteristics differs between germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers and non-carriers. In this study, we assessed the utility of ovarian tumour characteristics as predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity, for application using the American College of Medical Genetics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) variant classification system. METHODS: Data for 10,373 ovarian cancer cases, including carriers and non-carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants, were collected from unpublished international cohorts and consortia and published studies. Likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated for the association of ovarian cancer histology and other characteristics, with BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity. Estimates were aligned to ACMG/AMP code strengths (supporting, moderate, strong). RESULTS: No histological subtype provided informative ACMG/AMP evidence in favour of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity. Evidence against variant pathogenicity was estimated for the mucinous and clear cell histologies (supporting) and borderline cases (moderate). Refined associations are provided according to tumour grade, invasion and age at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: We provide detailed estimates for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity based on ovarian tumour characteristics. This evidence can be combined with other variant information under the ACMG/AMP classification system, to improve classification and carrier clinical management.
Basser Center for BRCA Abramson Cancer Center University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA 19066 USA
Biosciences Laboratory IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori Meldola Italy
Biostatistics Unit The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics Nicosia 2371 Cyprus
BMC Faculty of Medicine University of Iceland Reykjavik 101 Iceland
Cancer Epidemiology Division Cancer Council Victoria Melbourne VIC 3004 Australia
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 0RE UK
Center for Genomic Medicine Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen DK 2100 Denmark
Center for Medical Genetics NorthShore University HealthSystem Evanston IL 60201 USA
Centre for Cancer Research The Westmead Institute for Medical Research Sydney Australia
Centre for Medical Genetics Ghent University Gent 9000 Belgium
Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras Madrid 28029 Spain
Clinical Cancer Research Center Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg 9000 Denmark
Clinical Genetics Karolinska Institutet Stockholm 171 76 Sweden
Department of Biomedical Data Science Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA 94305 USA
Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics The Ohio State University Columbus OH 43210 USA
Department of Clinical Genetics Fox Chase Cancer Center Philadelphia PA 19111 USA
Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg 9000 Denmark
Department of Clinical Oncology A C Camargo Cancer Center São Paulo 1509900 Brazil
Department of Clinical Pathology The University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC 3010 Australia
Department of Gynaecological Oncology Westmead Hospital Sydney NSW 2145 Australia
Department of Molecular Genetics University of Toronto Toronto ON M5S 1A8 Canada
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Oregon Health and Science University Portland OR 97239 USA
Department of Oncology Lund University and Skåne University Hospital Lund 222 41 Sweden
Department of Pathology Landspitali University Hospital Reykjavik 101 Iceland
Department of Population Sciences Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope Duarte CA 91010 USA
Department of Radiation Oncology Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA 2215 USA
Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine Columbia University New York NY 10032 USA
Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica Santiago de Compostela 15706 Spain
Genetics Service Fundación Jiménez Díaz Madrid 28040 Spain
Genome Diagnostics Program IFOM ETS the AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Milan 20139 Italy
Gynaecology Research Unit Hannover Medical School Hannover 30625 Germany
Human Genetics Group Spanish National Cancer Research Centre Madrid 28029 Spain
Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV IRCCS Padua 35128 Italy
Knight Cancer Institute Oregon Health and Science University Portland OR 97239 USA
Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre Riga LV 1067 Latvia
LIFE Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases University of Leipzig Leipzig 04103 Germany
Magee Womens Hospital University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA 15213 USA
Molecular Diagnostics Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg 9000 Denmark
Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg 69120 Germany
Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC Hospital Clinico San Carlos IdISSC Madrid 28040 Spain
N N Petrov Institute of Oncology St Petersburg 197758 Russia
Oncology Center Hospital Sirio Libanes São Paulo 01308 050 Brazil
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia
Population Health Program QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Brisbane QLD 4006 Australia
School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences Institute University of Porto Porto 4050 013 Portugal
Service de Génétique Institut Curie Paris 75005 France
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology The University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia
SOD Genetica Molecolare University Hospital Pisa 56126 Italy
State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine Vilnius 8410 Lithuania
The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine Chicago IL 60637 USA
The University of Kansas Cancer Center Kansas City MO 66160 USA
The University of Sydney Sydney NSW 2145 Australia
Unit of Hereditary Cancer IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Genoa 16132 Italy
Unit of Pathology IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Genoa 16132 Italy
Waukesha Memorial Hospital Pro Health Care Waukesha WI 53188 USA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Sankaranarayanan R, Ferlay J. Worldwide burden of gynaecological cancer: the size of the problem. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20:207–25. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.10.007. PubMed DOI
Seidman JD, Horkayne-Szakaly I, Haiba M, Boice CR, Kurman RJ, Ronnett BM. The histologic type and stage distribution of ovarian carcinomas of surface epithelial origin. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2004;23:41–4. doi: 10.1097/01.pgp.0000101080.35393.16. PubMed DOI
Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH (eds). WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs, 4th edn. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014.
Shih IeM, Kurman RJ. Ovarian tumorigenesis: a proposed model based on morphological and molecular genetic analysis. Am J Pathol. 2004;164:1511–8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63708-X. PubMed DOI PMC
Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Boyd N, McKinney S, Mehl E, Palmer C, et al. Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: implications for biomarker studies. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050232. PubMed DOI PMC
Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:1117–30. doi: 10.1086/375033. PubMed DOI PMC
Ramus SJ, Song H, Dicks E, Tyrer JP, Rosenthal AN, Intermaggio MP, et al. Germline mutations in the BRIP1, BARD1, PALB2, and NBN genes in women with ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107:djv214. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv214. PubMed DOI PMC
Song H, Dicks E, Ramus SJ, Tyrer JP, Intermaggio MP, Hayward J, et al. Contribution of germline mutations in the RAD51B, RAD51C, and RAD51D genes to ovarian cancer in the population. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2901–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2408. PubMed DOI PMC
Lilyquist J, LaDuca H, Polley E, Davis BT, Shimelis H, Hu C, et al. Frequency of mutations in a large series of clinically ascertained ovarian cancer cases tested on multi-gene panels compared to reference controls. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;147:375–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.08.030. PubMed DOI PMC
Lakhani SR, Manek S, Penault-Llorca F, Flanagan A, Arnout L, Merrett S, et al. Pathology of ovarian cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:2473–81. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-1029-3. PubMed DOI
Schrader KA, Hurlburt J, Kalloger SE, Hansford S, Young S, Huntsman DG, et al. Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in ovarian cancer: utility of a histology-based referral strategy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:235–40. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31825f3576. PubMed DOI
Malander S, Ridderheim M, Måsbäck A, Loman N, Kristoffersson U, Olsson H, et al. One in 10 ovarian cancer patients carry germ line BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: results of a prospective study in Southern Sweden. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:422–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.09.016. PubMed DOI
Biglia N, Sgandurra P, Bounous VE, Maggiorotto F, Piva E, Pivetta E, et al. Ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers: analysis of prognostic factors and survival. Ecancermedicalscience. 2016;10:639. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2016.639. PubMed DOI PMC
Song H, Cicek MS, Dicks E, Harrington P, Ramus SJ, Cunningham JM, et al. The contribution of deleterious germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 and the mismatch repair genes to ovarian cancer in the population. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23:4703–9. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu172. PubMed DOI PMC
Kim SI, Lee M, Kim HS, Chung HH, Kim JW, Park NH, et al. Germline and somatic BRCA1/2 gene mutational status and clinical outcomes in epithelial peritoneal, ovarian, and fallopian tube cancer: over a decade of experience in a single institution in Korea. Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52:1229–41. PubMed PMC
Soegaard M, Kjaer SK, Cox M, Wozniak E, Høgdall E, Høgdall C, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation prevalence and clinical characteristics of a population-based series of ovarian cancer cases from Denmark. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3761–7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4806. PubMed DOI
Hauke J, Hahnen E, Schneider S, Reuss A, Richters L, Kommoss S, et al. Deleterious somatic variants in 473 consecutive individuals with ovarian cancer: results of the observational AGO-TR1 study (NCT02222883) J Med Genet. 2019;56:574–80. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105930. PubMed DOI
Norquist BM, Harrell MI, Brady MF, Walsh T, Lee MK, Gulsuner S, et al. Inherited mutations in women with ovarian carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:482–90. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5495. PubMed DOI PMC
Pal T, Permuth-Wey J, Betts JA, Krischer JP, Fiorica J, Arango H, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for a large proportion of ovarian carcinoma cases. Cancer. 2005;104:2807–16. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21536. PubMed DOI
Daly MB, Pal T, Berry MP, Buys SS, Dickson P, Domchek SM, et al. Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, and pancreatic, version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19:77–102. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001. PubMed DOI
Konstantinopoulos PA, Norquist B, Lacchetti C, Armstrong D, Grisham RN, Goodfellow PJ, et al. Germline and somatic tumor testing in epithelial ovarian cancer: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:1222–45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02960. PubMed DOI PMC
Arts-de Jong M, de Bock GH, van Asperen CJ, Mourits MJ, de Hullu JA, Kets CM. Germline BRCA1/2 mutation testing is indicated in every patient with epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2016;61:137–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.009. PubMed DOI
Marth C, Hubalek M, Petru E, Polterauer S, Reinthaller A, Schauer C, et al. AGO Austria recommendations for genetic testing of patients with ovarian cancer. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015;127:652–4. doi: 10.1007/s00508-015-0814-7. PubMed DOI PMC
Panchal SM, Ennis M, Canon S, Bordeleau LJ. Selecting a BRCA risk assessment model for use in a familial cancer clinic. BMC Med Genet. 2008;9:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-9-116. PubMed DOI PMC
Murray ML, Cerrato F, Bennett RL, Jarvik GP. Follow-up of carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of unknown significance: variant reclassification and surgical decisions. Genet Med. 2011;13:998–1005. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318226fc15. PubMed DOI
Vos J, Otten W, van Asperen C, Jansen A, Menko F, Tibben A. The counsellees’ view of an unclassified variant in BRCA1/2: recall, interpretation, and impact on life. Psychooncology. 2008;17:822–30. doi: 10.1002/pon.1311. PubMed DOI
Richter S, Haroun I, Graham TC, Eisen A, Kiss A, Warner E. Variants of unknown significance in BRCA testing: impact on risk perception, worry, prevention and counseling. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:viii69–viii74. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt312. PubMed DOI
Moghadasi S, Eccles DM, Devilee P, Vreeswijk MP, van Asperen CJ. Classification and clinical management of variants of uncertain significance in high penetrance cancer predisposition genes. Hum Mutat. 2016;37:331–6. doi: 10.1002/humu.22956. PubMed DOI
Eccles DM, Mitchell G, Monteiro AN, Schmutzler R, Couch FJ, Spurdle AB, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing-pitfalls and recommendations for managing variants of uncertain clinical significance. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:2057–65. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv278. PubMed DOI PMC
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. PubMed DOI PMC
Richards CS, Bale S, Bellissimo DB, Das S, Grody WW, Hegde MR, et al. ACMG recommendations for standards for interpretation and reporting of sequence variations: revisions 2007. Genet Med. 2008;10:294–300. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31816b5cae. PubMed DOI
Tavtigian SV, Greenblatt MS, Harrison SM, Nussbaum RL, Prabhu SA, Boucher KM, et al. Modeling the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines as a Bayesian classification framework. Genet Med. 2018;20:1054–60. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.210. PubMed DOI PMC
Goldgar DE, Easton DF, Deffenbaugh AM, Monteiro AN, Tavtigian SV, Couch FJ. Integrated evaluation of DNA sequence variants of unknown clinical significance: application to BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75:535–44. doi: 10.1086/424388. PubMed DOI PMC
Spurdle AB, Healey S, Devereau A, Hogervorst FB, Monteiro AN, Nathanson KL, et al. ENIGMA–evidence-based network for the interpretation of germline mutant alleles: an international initiative to evaluate risk and clinical significance associated with sequence variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:2–7. doi: 10.1002/humu.21628. PubMed DOI PMC
Lindor NM, Guidugli L, Wang X, Vallée MP, Monteiro AN, Tavtigian S, et al. A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) Hum Mutat. 2012;33:8–21. doi: 10.1002/humu.21627. PubMed DOI PMC
Lovelock PK, Spurdle AB, Mok MT, Farrugia DJ, Lakhani SR, Healey S, et al. Identification of BRCA1 missense substitutions that confer partial functional activity: potential moderate risk variants? Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:R82. doi: 10.1186/bcr1826. PubMed DOI PMC
Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Lee S, Duggan MA, Kelemen LE, Prentice L, et al. Biomarker-based ovarian carcinoma typing: a histologic investigation in the ovarian tumor tissue analysis consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22:1677–86. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0391. PubMed DOI PMC
Alsop K, Fereday S, Meldrum C, deFazio A, Emmanuel C, George J, et al. BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2654–63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.8545. PubMed DOI PMC
Berchuck A, Heron KA, Carney ME, Lancaster JM, Fraser EG, Vinson VL, et al. Frequency of germline and somatic BRCA1 mutations in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4:2433–7. PubMed
Choi MC, Heo JH, Jang JH, Jung SG, Park H, Joo WD, et al. Germline mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Korean ovarian cancer patients: finding founder mutations. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25:1386–91. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000529. PubMed DOI
Rust K, Spiliopoulou P, Tang CY, Bell C, Stirling D, Phang T, et al. Routine germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in patients with ovarian carcinoma: analysis of the Scottish real-life experience. BJOG. 2018;125:1451–8. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15171. PubMed DOI
Koopman PAR. Confidence intervals for the ratio of two binomial proportions. Biometrics. 1984;40:513–7. doi: 10.2307/2531405. DOI
Vang R, Shih IeM, Kurman RJ. Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems. Adv Anat Pathol. 2009;16:267–82. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e3181b4fffa. PubMed DOI PMC
Lim D, Murali R, Murray MP, Veras E, Park KJ, Soslow RA. Morphological and immunohistochemical reevaluation of tumors initially diagnosed as ovarian endometrioid carcinoma with emphasis on high-grade tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:302–12. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000550. PubMed DOI PMC