Echocardiography in shock
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Review, Journal Article
PubMed
37078626
DOI
10.1097/mcc.0000000000001041
PII: 00075198-202306000-00017
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Echocardiography * MeSH
- Hemodynamics MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Shock * diagnostic imaging therapy MeSH
- Heart MeSH
- Fluid Therapy MeSH
- Vasoconstrictor Agents therapeutic use MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Vasoconstrictor Agents MeSH
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this study was to illustrate the varying roles of echocardiography in all phases of shock ranging from a rapid, diagnostic tool at the bedside, to a tool for monitoring the adequacy and effects of shock treatment and finally for identification of patients suitable for de-escalation of therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Echocardiography has become an indispensable tool for establishing diagnosis in patients with shock. It is also important for assessing the adequacy of treatment such as fluid resuscitation, vasopressors and inotropes by providing integrated information on cardiac contractility and systemic flow conditions, particularly when used in conjunction with other methods of advanced haemodynamic monitoring. Apart from a traditional, diagnostic role, it may be used as an advanced, albeit intermittent, monitoring tool. Examples include the assessment of heart-lung interactions in mechanically ventilated patients, fluid responsiveness, vasopressor adequacy, preload dependence in ventilator-induced pulmonary oedema and indications for and monitoring during extracorporeal life support. Emerging studies also illustrate the role of echocardiography in de-escalation of shock treatment. SUMMARY: This study provides the reader with a structured review on the uses of echocardiography in all phases of shock treatment.
See more in PubMed
Sakr Y, Reinhart K, Vincent JL, et al. Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the sepsis occurrence in acutely ill patients (SOAP) study. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:589–597.
Labovitz AJ, Noble VE, Bierig M, et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound in the emergent setting: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010; 23:1225–1230.
Doherty JU, Kort S, Mehran R, et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2019 appropriate use criteria for multimodality imaging in the assessment of cardiac structure and function in nonvalvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 73:488–516.
De Backer D, Giglioli S. Echocardiographic approach to shock. J Emerg Crit Care Med 2019; 3:35.
Chew MS. Haemodynamic monitoring using echocardiography in the critically ill: a review. Cardiol Res Prac 2012; 2012:139537.
De Backer D, Aissaoui N, Cecconi M, et al. How assessing haemodynamics help to assess volume status. Intensive Care Med 2022; 48:1482–1494.
Cholley B. Echocardiography in the intensive care unit: beyond “eyeballing”. A plea for the broader use of the aortic velocity-time integral measurement. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45:898–990.
Robba C, Wong A, Poole D, et al. Basic ultrasound head-to-toe skills for intensivists in the general and neurointensive care unit population: consensus and expert recommendations of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47:1347–1367.
Expert Round Table on Echocardiography in the ICU. International consensus statement on training standards for advanced critical care echocardiography. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40:654–666.
McLean AS. Echocardiography in shock management. Crit Care 2016; 20:275.
Balik M, Pazout J, Fric M, Sidak M. Echocardiography as a part of haemodynamic monitoring in intensive care. Anesthesiol Intensive Med 2001; 12:120–124.
Zhang H, Lian H, Zhang Q, et al. Prognostic implications of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/pulmonary arterial systolic pressure ratio in septic shock patients. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2020; 18:1–10.
Bowcock EM, Gerhardy B, Huang S, Orde S. Right ventricular outflow tract Doppler flow analysis and pulmonary arterial coupling by transthoracic echocardiography in sepsis: a retrospective exploratory study. Critical Care 2022; 26:303.
Boissier F, Katsahian S, Razazi K, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of cor pulmonale during protective ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intens Care Med 2013; 39:725–1733.
Mekontso Dessap A, Boissier F, Charron C, et al. Acute cor pulmonale during protective ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: prevalence, predictors, and clinical impact. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42:862–870.
Vignon P, Repesse X, Begot E, et al. Comparison of echocardiographic indices used to predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 195:1022–1032.
Ospina Tascon GA, Teboul J-L, Hernandez G, et al. Diastolic shock index and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock. Ann Intensive Care 2020; 10:41.
Vieillard Baron A, Caille V, Charron C, et al. Actual incidence of global left ventricular hypokinesia in adult septic shock. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:1701–1706.
Damluji AA, van Diepen S, Katz JN, et al. Mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021; 144:e16–e35.
Habib G, Badano L, Tribouilloy G, et al. Recommendations for the practice of echocardiography in infective endocarditis. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010; 11:202–219.
Mekontso Dessap A, Chew MS. Cardiac tamponade. Int Care Med 2018; 44:936–939.
Ouweneel DM, Schotborgh JV, Limpens J, et al. Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42:1922–1934.
Belohlavek J, Smalcova J, Rob D, et al. Effect of intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and immediate invasive assessment and treatment on functional neurologic outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2022; 327:737–747.
Vogel DJ, Murray J, Czapran AZ, et al. Veno-arterio-venous ECMO for septic cardiomyopathy: a single-centre experience. Perfusion 2018; 33:57–64.
Ling RR, Ramanathan K, Poon WH, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as mechanical circulatory support in adult septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis with individual participant data meta-regression analysis. Crit Care 2021; 25:246.
Donker DW, Meuwese CL, Braithwaite SA, et al. Echocardiography in extracorporeal life support: a key player in procedural guidance, tailoring and monitoring. Perfusion 2018; 33:31–41.
Belohlavek J, Hunziker P, Donker DW. Left ventricular unloading and the role of ECpella. Eur Heart J Suppl 2021; 23: (Suppl A): A27–A34.
Beaubien-Souligny, Rola P, Haycock K, et al. Quantifying systemic congestion with point-off-care ultrasound: development of the venous excess ultrasound grading system. Ultra sound J 2020; 12:16.
Malbrain M, Martin G, Ostermann MM. Everything you need to know about deresuscitation. Intensive Care Med 2022; 48:1781–1786.
Vignon P. Cardiovascular failure and weaning. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6:354.
Liu J, Shen F, Teboul J-L. Cardiac dysfunction induced by weaning from mechanical ventilation: incidence, risk factors and effects of fluid removal. Crit Care 2016; 20:369.