• This record comes from PubMed

For Which Patients Should Bladder Preservation Be Considered After a Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

. 2023 Nov ; 9 (6) : 900-902. [epub] 20230506

Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Review, Comment

Links

PubMed 37150628
DOI 10.1016/j.euf.2023.04.009
PII: S2405-4569(23)00106-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Given the morbidity associated with radical cystectomy (RC) and the significant survival benefit for patients who experience tumor downstaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), there is growing interest in bladder preservation strategies for select patients who have a complete response (CR) to NAC. In this mini-review we discuss the concept of avoiding RC as an alternative option for patients who experience a clinical CR following NAC. Several studies support this concept, with comparable long-term survival outcomes observed for patients with cT0 disease after NAC and patients undergoing RC. However, the definitive approach and the optimal surveillance strategy for patients with a clinical CR who choose bladder preservation are lacking. A dynamic response-driven bladder preservation strategy is a highly anticipated option for patients and is needed to avoid debilitating overtreatment. PATIENT SUMMARY: For selected patients with bladder cancer who experience a complete response to chemotherapy before any surgery, close follow-up might be an alternative option to surgical removal of the bladder without compromising cancer control.

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology Hillel Yaffe Medical Center Hadera Israel

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam Saudi Arabia

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Okayama Japan

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria; Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA; Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA; Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia; Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery Jordan University Hospital The University of Jordan Amman Jordan

Comment On

PubMed

References provided by Crossref.org

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...