Pulmonary embolism-related refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Prague OHCA study post hoc analysis
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu randomizované kontrolované studie, časopisecké články
PubMed
37172033
PubMed Central
PMC10449371
DOI
10.1093/ehjacc/zuad052
PII: 7161010
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- cardiac arrest, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, organ donorship, pulmonary embolism,
- MeSH
- kardiopulmonální resuscitace * metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mimotělní membránová oxygenace * metody MeSH
- plicní embolie * etiologie komplikace MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- zástava srdce mimo nemocnici * etiologie terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
AIMS: Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (r-OHCA) in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with poor outcomes. The role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in this patient group is uncertain. This study aims to analyse clinical course, outcomes, and the effect of an invasive procedure, including ECPR, in a randomized population. METHODS AND RESULTS: A post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial (Prague OHCA study) was conducted to evaluate the effect of ECPR vs. a standard approach in r-OHCA. A subgroup of patients with PE-related r-OHCA was identified, and procedural and outcome characteristics, including favourable neurological survival, organ donation, and complications, were compared to patients without PE. Pulmonary embolism was identified as a cause of r-OHCA in 24 of 256 (9.4%) enrolled patients. Patients with PE were more likely to be women [12/24 (50%) vs. 32/232 (13.8%); P < 0.001] and presented more frequently with an initial non-shockable rhythm [23/24 (95.8%) vs. 77/232 (33.2%); P < 0.001], as well as more severe acidosis at admission [median pH (interquartile range); 6.83 (6.75-6.88) vs. 6.98 (6.82-7.14); P < 0.001]. Their favourable 180-day neurological survival was significantly lower [2/24 (8.3%) vs. 66/232 (28.4%); P = 0.049], but the proportion of accepted organ donors was higher (16.7 vs. 4.7%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to PE has a different presentation and inferior outcomes compared to other causes but may represent an important source of organ donations. The ECPR method did not improve patient outcomes.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Javaudin F, Lascarrou JB, Le Bastard Q, Le Bastard Q, Bourry Q, Latour C, et al. . Thrombolysis during resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest caused by pulmonary embolism increases 30-day survival: findings from the French National Cardiac Arrest Registry. Chest 2019;156:116775. PubMed
Lott C, Truhlář A, Alfonzo A, González-Salvado V, Hinkelbein J, Nolan JP, et al. . European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation 2021;161:152–219. 9. PubMed
Mandigers L, Scholten E, Rietdijk WJR, den Uil CA, van Thiel RJ, Rigter S, et al. . Survival and neurological outcome with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest caused by massive pulmonary embolism: a two center observational study. Resuscitation 2019;136:8–13. PubMed
Moon D, Lee SN, Yoo KD, Jo MS. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation improved survival in patients with massive pulmonary embolism. Ann Saudi Med. 2018;38:174–180. PubMed PMC
Belohlavek J, Smalcova J, Rob D, Franek O, Smid O, Pokorna M, et al. . Effect of intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and immediate invasive assessment and treatment on functional neurologic outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2022;327:737–747. PubMed PMC
Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA, Biarent D, Bossaert LL, Deakin C, et al. . European Resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2010 section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation 2010;81:1219–1276. PubMed
Tanabe Y, Yamamoto T, Murata T, Mabuchi K, Hara N, Mizuno A, et al. . Gender differences among patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 2018;122:1079–1084. PubMed
Conrad SA, Broman LM, Taccone FS, Lorusso R, Malfertheiner MV, Pappalardo F, et al. . The extracorporeal life support organization Maastricht treaty for nomenclature in extracorporeal life support. A position paper of the extracorporeal life support organization. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018;198:447–451. PubMed PMC
Meneveau N, Guillon B, Planquette B, Piton G, Kimmoun A, Gaide-Chevronnay L, et al. . Outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the treatment of high-risk pulmonary embolism: a multicentre series of 52 cases. Eur Heart J 2018;39:4196–4204. PubMed
Kjaergaard B, Kristensen JH, Sindby JE, de Neergaard S, Rasmussen BS. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in life-threatening massive pulmonary embolism. Perfusion 2019;34:467–474. PubMed
Bougouin W, Marijon E, Planquette B, Karam N, Dumas F, Celermajer DS, et al. . Pulmonary embolism related sudden cardiac arrest admitted alive at hospital: management and outcomes. Resuscitation 2017;115:135–140. PubMed
Takahashi H, Okada K, Matsumori M, Kano H, Kitagawa A, Okita Y. Aggressive surgical treatment of acute pulmonary embolism with circulatory collapse. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:785–791. PubMed
Lin TW, Tsai MT, Hu YN, Wang YC, Wen JS, Wu HY, et al. . Simultaneous thrombolysis and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute massive pulmonary emboli. Ann Thorac Surg 2021;111:923–929. PubMed
George B, Parazino M, Omar HR, Davis G, Guglin M, Gurley J, et al. . A retrospective comparison of survivors and non-survivors of massive pulmonary embolism receiving veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Resuscitation. 2018; 122:1–5. PubMed