OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between osseous variations of the glenoid fossa and thinning of the overlaying articular cartilage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 360 dry scapulae, comprising adult, children and fetal specimens, were observed for potential presence of osseous variants inside the glenoid fossa. Subsequently, the appearance of the observed variants was evaluated using CT and MRI (each 300 scans), and in-time arthroscopic findings (20 procedures). New terminology of the observed variants was proposed by an expert panel formed by orthopaedic surgeons, anatomists and radiologists. RESULTS: Tubercle of Assaky was observed in 140 (46.7%) adult scapulae, and an innominate osseous depression was identified in 27 (9.0%) adult scapulae. Upon radiological imaging, the tubercle of Assaky was found in 128 (42.7%) CTs and 118 (39.3%) MRIs, while the depression was identified in 12 (4.0%) CTs and 14 (4.7%) MRIs. Articular cartilage above the osseous variations appeared relatively thinner and in several young individuals was found completely absent. Moreover, the tubercle of Assaky featured an increasing prevalence with aging, while the osseous depression develops in the second decade. Macroscopic articular cartilage thinning was identified in 11 (55.0%) arthroscopies. Consequently, four new terms were invented to describe the presented findings. CONCLUSION: Physiological articular cartilage thinning occurs due to the presence of the intraglenoid tubercle or the glenoid fovea. In teenagers, the cartilage above the glenoid fovea may be naturally absent. Screening for these variations increases the diagnostic accuracy of glenoid defects. In addition, implementing the proposed terminological updates would optimize communication accuracy.

1st Department of Orthopaedics 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic

Center for Endoscopic Surgical and Clinical Anatomy 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Clinic of Trauma Surgery Masaryk Hospital Usti Nad Labem Czech Republic

Department of Anatomy 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Plzenska 130 221 150 06 Prague 5 Czech Republic

Department of Health Care Studies College of Polytechnics Jihlava Czech Republic

Department of Radiology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Burkhart SS, de Beer JF, Tehrany AM, Parten PM. Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability. Arthrosc. 2002;18:488–491. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.32212. PubMed DOI

Ramos MRF, Hidalgo PF, Fagundes D, Junior YACS. Bare spot location in glenoid cavity: comparison between arthroscopy and CT scan. Acta Ortop Bras. 2020;28:243–246. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220202805232045. PubMed DOI PMC

Alashkham A, Soames R. The glenoid and humeral head in shoulder osteoarthritis: a comprehensive review. Clin Anat. 2021;34:710–720. doi: 10.1002/ca.23703. PubMed DOI

Assaky G. Contribution a l’anatomie et a la physiologie de la cavité glénoide de l’omoplate. In: Masson G, editor. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances et mémoires de la Société de Biologie. Paris: Libraire de l’Académie de médecine; 1885. pp. 371–373.

Aigner F, Longato S, Fritsch H, Kralinger F. Anatomical considerations regarding the “bare spot” of the glenoid cavity. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004;26:308–311. doi: 10.1007/s00276-003-0217-8. PubMed DOI

Alashkham A, Alraddadi A, Soames R. Bare spot and tubercle of Assaki. JSES Open Access. 2017;1:141–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2017.07.005. PubMed DOI PMC

Barcia AM, Rowles DJ, Bottoni CR, Dekker TJ, Tokish JM. Glenoid bare area: arthroscopic characterization and its implications on measurement of bone loss. Arthrosc. 2013;29:1671–1675. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.06.019. PubMed DOI

Cresswell TR, de Beer JF, du Toit D. The position of the “bare spot” – not central in the glenoid. SA Orthop J. 2008;7:37–40.

Huysmans PE, Haen PS, Kidd M, Dhert WJ, Wilems JW. The shape of the inferior part of the glenoid: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:759–763. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.001. PubMed DOI

Kralinger F, Aigner F, Longato S, Rieger M, Wambacher M. Is the bare spot a consistent landmark for shoulder arthroscopy? A study of 20 embalmed glenoids with 3-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction. Arthrosc. 2006;22:428–432. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.12.006. PubMed DOI

Ly JQ, Bui-Mansfield LT, Kline MJ, DeBerardino TM, Taylor DC. Bare area of the glenoid: magnetic resonance appearance with arthroscopic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28:229–232. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200403000-00013. PubMed DOI

Miyatake K, Takeda Y, Fujii K, Takasago T, Iwame T. Validity of arthroscopic measurement of glenoid bone loss using the bare spot. Open Access J Sports Med. 2014;5:37–42. PubMed PMC

Saintmard B, Lecouvet F, Rubini A, Dubuc JE. Is the bare spot a valid landmark for glenoid evaluation in arthroscopic Bankart surgery? Acta Ortop Belg. 2009;75:736–742. PubMed

Djebbar S, Rosenberg ZS, Alaia EF, Agten C, Zember J, Rossi I. Imaging features of glenoid bare spot in a pediatric population. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47:45–50. doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2755-x. PubMed DOI

Shin SJ, Jun BJ, Koh YW, McGarry MH, Lee TQ. Estimation of anterior glenoid bone loss area using the ratio of bone defect length to the distance from posterior glenoid rim to the centre of the glenoid. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:48–55. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4312-x. PubMed DOI

De Wilde LF, Berghs BM, Audenaert E, Sys G, Van Maele GO, Barbaix E. About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004;26:54–59. doi: 10.1007/s00276-003-0167-1. PubMed DOI

Kim HK, Emery KH, Salisbury SR. Bare spot of the glenoid fossa in children: incidence and MRI features. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40:1190–1196. doi: 10.1007/s00247-009-1494-0. PubMed DOI

Tena-Arregui J, Barrio-Asensio C, Puerta-Fonolla J, Murillo-Gonzalez J. Arthroscopic study of the shoulder joint in fetuses. Arthrosc. 2005;21:1114–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.013. PubMed DOI

Garcia-Garcia S, Gonzalez-Sanchez JJ, Kakaizada S, Lawton MT, Benet A. Facial nerve preservation for supraorbital approaches: anatomical mapping based on consistent landmarks. Oper Neurosurg. 2020;18:52–59. doi: 10.1093/ons/opz084. PubMed DOI PMC

Babicki S, Arndt D, Marcu A, Liang Y, Grant JR, Maciejewski A, Wishart DS. Heatmapper: web-enabled heat mapping for all. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:147–153. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw419. PubMed DOI PMC

Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RB. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984;74:979–983. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.74.9.979. PubMed DOI PMC

Alashkham A, Alraddadi A, Soames R. The glenoid notch and its clinical implications. Rev Arg de Anat Clin. 2017;9:11–17. doi: 10.31051/1852.8023.v9.n1.16495. DOI

Bainbridge D, Tarazaga SG. A study of sex differences in the scapula. J Royal Anthrop Inst Great Britain and Ireland. 1956;86:109–134.

De Maeseneer M, Pouliart N, Boulet C, Machiels F, Shahabpour M, Kichouh M, De Mey J. A bare area of the glenoid misdiagnosed as a cartilage ulceration. JBR-BTR. 2012;95:22–24. PubMed

Graves WW. The types of scapule: a comparative study of some correlated characteristics in human scapulae. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1921;4:111–128. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330040202. DOI

Testut L. Traité d’anatomie humaine. Tome 1. 1899. O. Doin, Paris.

DePalma AF. Surgery of the shoulder. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1950.

Harryman DT, Sidles JA, Clark JM, McQuade KJ, Gibb TD, Matsen FA. Translation of humeral head on the glenoid with passive glenohumeral motion. J Bone Joint Surg. 1990;72A:1334–1343. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199072090-00009. PubMed DOI

Howell SM, Galinat BJ, Renzi AJ, Marone PJ. Normal and abnormal mechanics of the glenohumeral joint in the horizontal plane. J Bone Joint Surg. 1988;70A:227–232. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198870020-00010. PubMed DOI

Warner JJP, Bowen MK, Deng X, Hannafin JA, Arnoczky SP, Warren RF. Articular contact of the normal glenohumeral joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7:381–388. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90027-1. PubMed DOI

Wolff J. Ueber die innere Architectur der Knochen und ihre Bedeutung für die Frage vom Knochenwachsthum. Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med. 1870;50:389–450. doi: 10.1007/BF01944490. DOI

Kothary S, Rosenberg ZS, Poncinelli LL, Kwong S. Skeletal development of the glenoid and glenoid-coracoid interface in the pediatric population: MRI features. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43:1281–1288. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-1936-0. PubMed DOI

Maftei I. Personalitati iesene. Comitelul de cultura si educatie al judelutui Iasi. 1972. Iasi.