Heterogeneity in Clinical Practices for Post-Cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support: a Pilot Survey from the PELS-1 Multicenter Study
Status Publisher Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
37351569
DOI
10.1111/aor.14601
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Cardiac surgery, Clinical practices, Extracorporeal Life support, Heart Failure, Post-cardiotomy Shock, Survey,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: High-quality evidence for post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support (PC-ECLS) management is lacking. This study investigated the real-world PC-ECLS clinical practices. METHODS: This cross-sectional, multi-institutional, international pilot survey explored center organization, anticoagulation management, left ventricular unloading, distal limb perfusion, PC-ECLS monitoring and transfusions practices. Twenty-nine questions were distributed among 34 hospitals participating in the Post-cardiotomy Extra-Corporeal Life Support Study. RESULTS: Of the 32 centers [16 low-volume (50%); 16 high-volume (50%)] that responded, 16 (50%) had dedicated ECLS specialists. Twenty-six centers (81.3%) reported using additional mechanical circulatory supports. Anticoagulation practices were highly heterogeneous: 24 hospitals (75%) reported using patient's bleeding status as a guide, without a specific threshold in 54.2% of cases. Transfusion targets ranged 7-10 g/dL. Most centers used cardiac venting on a case-by-case basis (78.1%) and regular distal limb perfusion (84.4%). Nineteen (54.9%) centers reported dedicated monitoring protocols including daily echocardiography (87.5%), Swan-Ganz catheterization (40.6%), cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (53.1%) and multimodal assessment of limb ischemia. Inspection of the circuit (71.9%), oxygenator pressure drop (68.8%), plasma free hemoglobin (75%), d-dimer (59.4%), lactate dehydrogenase (56.3%) and fibrinogen (46.9%) are used to diagnose hemolysis and thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows remarkable heterogeneity in clinical practices for PC-ECLS management. More standardized protocols and better implementation of available evidence are recommended.
Adult Intensive Care Services The Prince Charles Hospital Brisbane Australia
Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore Maryland USA
Cardiac Surgery Unit Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department Niguarda Hospital Milan Italy
Cardiac Surgery Unit IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano Italy
Clinic of Internal Medicine Department of Cardiac Surgery University of Szeged Szeged Hungary
Department of Cardiac Surgery Leipzig Heart Center Leipzig Germany
Department of Cardiac Surgery Louis Pradel Cardiologic Hospital Lyon France
Department of Cardiac Surgery Medical Faculty Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf Germany
Department of Cardio Thoracic Surgery University Hospital Henri Mondor Créteil Paris France
Department of Cardiology Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia Bucaramanga Colombia
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery University Medical Center Regensburg Regensburg Germany
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg Genk Belgium
Departments of Medicine and Surgery University of Maryland Baltimore USA
Division of Cardiac Surgery Cardiothoracic Department University Hospital of Udine Udine Italy
Division of Cardiac Surgery IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna Bologna Italy
Division of Cardiac Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Division of Cardiac Surgery Memorial Healthcare System Hollywood FL USA
Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Pontchaillou University Hospital Rennes France
ECLS Unit Departamento de Anestesia Clínica Las Condes Las Condes Santiago Chile
Intensive Care Unit The Alfred Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia
IU Health Advanced Heart and Lung Care Indiana University Methodist Hospital Indianapolis IN USA
Ospedale del Cuore Fondazione Toscana G Monasterio Massa Italy
University of Turin Department of Surgical Sciences Turin Italy
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org