Understanding when it is acceptable to interrupt a joint activity is an important part of understanding what cooperation entails. Philosophical analyses have suggested that we should release our partner from a joint activity anytime the activity conflicts with fulfilling a moral obligation. To probe young children's understanding of this aspect, we investigated whether 3-year-old children (N = 60) are sensitive to the legitimacy of motives (selfish condition vs. moral condition) leading agents to intentionally interrupt their joint activity. We measured whether children protested or released their partner by scoring their reactions. Our results indicate that children did not manifest different reactions when the motive behind their partner leaving was moral than when the motive was selfish. However, our data showed a stable pattern: regardless of the partner's motives, some 3-year-olds take initiatives to release their partners from joint activity, suggesting that measuring release is a valuable tool for investigating joint action.

Department of Cognitive Science Central European University Vienna Austria

Department of Philosophy University of Milan Milan Italy

Department of Philosophy University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom

Department of Psychology and Life Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Psychology University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom

See more in PubMed

Gilbert M. Joint commitment. How we make the social world. Oxford: New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2014.

Gilbert M. Joint commitment. In: Janković M, Ludwig K, editors. The Routledge Handbook of Collective Intentionality. New York, NY: Routledge; 2017. pp. 130–139.

Michael J, Sebanz N, Knoblich G. The sense of commitment: A minimal approach. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016;6: 1968. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01968 PubMed DOI PMC

Searle JR. Making the Social World. New York, NY: New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010.

Tomasello M. Why we cooperate? Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2009.

Tomasello M. A natural history of human morality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2016.

Shpall S. Moral and rational commitment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 2014;88: 146–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00618.x DOI

Li L, Tucker A, Tomasello M. Young children judge defection less negatively when there’s a good justification. Cognitive Development. 2022;64: 101268. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101268 DOI

Gräfenhain M, Behne T, Carpenter M, Tomasello M. Young children’s understanding of joint commitments. Developmental Psychology. 2009;45: 1430–1443. doi: 10.1037/a0016122 PubMed DOI

Gräfenhain M, Carpenter M, Tomasello M. Three-year-olds’ understanding of the consequences of joint commitments. PLoS ONE. 2013;8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073039 PubMed DOI PMC

Hamann K, Warneken F, Tomasello M. Children’s developing commitments to joint goals. Child Development. 2012;83: 137–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01695.x PubMed DOI

Koomen R, Grueneisen S, Herrmann E. Children delay gratification for cooperative ends. Psychol Sci. 2020;31: 139–148. doi: 10.1177/0956797619894205 PubMed DOI

Butler LP, Walton GM. The opportunity to collaborate increases preschoolers’ motivation for challenging tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2013;116: 953–961. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.06.007 PubMed DOI

Michael J, Pacherie E. On commitments and other uncertainty reduction tools in joint action. Journal of Social Ontology. 2015;1. doi: 10.1515/jso-2014-0021 DOI

Darwall SL. The second-person standpoint: Morality, respect, and accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2006.

Tomasello M. The moral psychology of obligation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2020;43: e56. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19001742 PubMed DOI

Kachel U, Svetlova M, Tomasello M. Three-year-olds’ reactions to a partner’s failure to perform her role in a joint commitment. Child Development. 2018;89: 1691–1703. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12816 PubMed DOI

Kanngiesser P, Mammen M, Tomasello M. Young children’s understanding of justifications for breaking a promise. Cognitive Development. 2021;60: 101127. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101127 DOI

Kachel U, Tomasello M. 3- and 5-year-old children’s adherence to explicit and implicit joint commitments. Developmental Psychology. 2019. doi: 10.1037/dev0000632 PubMed DOI

Siposova B, Tomasello M, Carpenter M. Communicative eye contact signals a commitment to cooperate for young children. Cognition. 2018;179: 192–201. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.010 PubMed DOI

Gilbert M. Walking Together: a paradigmatic social phenomenon. Midwest Studies in Philosophy. 1990;15: 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1990.tb00202.x DOI

Roberts G. Cooperation through interdependence. Animal Behaviour. 2005;70: 901–908. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.006 DOI

Michael J, Sebanz N, Knoblich G. Observing joint action: Coordination creates commitment. Cognition. 2016;157: 106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.024 PubMed DOI PMC

Székely M, Michael J. Investing in commitment: Persistence in a joint action is enhanced by the perception of a partner’s effort. Cognition. 2018;174: 37–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.012 PubMed DOI

Chennells M, Michael J. Effort and performance in a cooperative activity are boosted by perception of a partner’s effort. Scientific Reports. 2018;8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34096-1 PubMed DOI PMC

Rusch H, Lütge C. Spillovers from coordination to cooperation: Evidence for the interdependence hypothesis? Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. 2016;10: 284–296.

Mant CM, Perner J. The child’s understanding of commitment. Developmental Psychology. 1988;24: 343–351. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.24.3.343 DOI

Cushman F, Sheketoff R, Wharton S, Carey S. The development of intent-based moral judgment. Cognition. 2013;127: 6–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.008 PubMed DOI

Hamlin JK. Failed attempts to help and harm: Intention versus outcome in preverbal infants’ social evaluations. Cognition. 2013;128: 451–474. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.004 PubMed DOI

Vaish A, Carpenter M, Tomasello M. Young children selectively avoid helping people with harmful intentions. Child development. 2010. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01500.x/full PubMed DOI

Mercier H, Sperber D. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. The Behavioral and brain sciences. 2011;34: 57–74; discussion 74–111. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000968 PubMed DOI

Corriveau KH, Kurkul KE. “Why does rain fall?”: Children prefer to learn from an informant who uses noncircular explanations. Child Development. 2014;85: 1827–1835. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12240 PubMed DOI

Koenig MA. Beyond Semantic Accuracy: Preschoolers Evaluate a Speaker’s Reasons: Children’s Understanding of Reasons. Child Development. 2012;83: 1051–1063. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01742.x PubMed DOI

Mercier H, Bernard S, Clément F. Early sensitivity to arguments: How preschoolers weight circular arguments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.11.011 PubMed DOI

Rakoczy H, Warneken F, Tomasello M. “This way!”, “No! That way!”-3-year olds know that two people can have mutually incompatible desires. Cognitive Development. 2007;22: 47–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.08.002 DOI

Domberg A, Köymen B, Tomasello M. Children’s reasoning with peers in cooperative and competitive contexts. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2018;36: 64–77. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12213 PubMed DOI

Dobson AJ, Barnett AG. An introduction to generalized linear models. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2008.

Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H. Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner’s curse. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011;65: 47–55. doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-1038-5 PubMed DOI PMC

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2020. https://www.R-project.org/

Christensen RHB. ordinal—Regression models for ordinal data. 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ordinal

Liddell TM, Kruschke JK. Analyzing ordinal data with metric models: What could possibly go wrong? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2018;79: 328–348. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.009 DOI

Kachel U, Svetlova M, Tomasello M. Three- and 5-year-old children’s understanding of how to dissolve a joint commitment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2019;184: 34–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.03.008 PubMed DOI

Moll H, Tomasello M. Cooperation and human cognition: the Vygotskian intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of \ldots. 2007. Available: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/362/1480/639.short PubMed PMC

Tomasello M. A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2014.

Köymen B, Tomasello M. The Early Ontogeny of Reason Giving. Child Development Perspectives. 2020;14: 215–220. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12384 DOI

Mahr JB, Csibra G. Why do we remember? the communicative function of episodic memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2018;41: 1–16. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17000012 PubMed DOI PMC

Mammen M, Köymen B, Tomasello M. The reasons young children give to peers when explaining their judgments of moral and conventional rules. Developmental psychology. 2018;54: 254–262. doi: 10.1037/dev0000424 PubMed DOI

Michael J, Székely M. The developmental origins of commitment. Journal of Social Philosophy. 2018.

Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world? The Behavioral and brain sciences. 2010;33: 61–83; discussion 83–135. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X PubMed DOI

Nielsen M, Haun D, Kärtner J, Legare CH. The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2017;162: 31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.017 PubMed DOI PMC

Barclay P. Bidding to Commit. Evolutionary Psychology. 2017;15: 147470491769074. doi: 10.1177/1474704917690740 PubMed DOI PMC

Baumard N, André J-B, Sperber D. A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2013;36: 59–78. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11002202 PubMed DOI

Isella M, Kanngiesser P, Tomasello M. Children’s selective trust in promises. Child Development. 2019;90: e868–e887. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13105 PubMed DOI

Bonalumi F, Isella M, Michael J. Cueing Implicit Commitment. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 2019;10: 669–688. doi: 10.1007/s13164-018-0425-0 DOI