Capillary Electrophoresis with Interchangeable Cartridges for Versatile and Automated Analyses of Dried Blood Spot Samples
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
37505089
PubMed Central
PMC10413327
DOI
10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02474
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Amino Acids * MeSH
- Electric Conductivity MeSH
- Electrophoresis, Capillary * methods MeSH
- Capillaries MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Dried Blood Spot Testing methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Amino Acids * MeSH
A novel concept for highly versatile automated analyses of dried blood spot (DBS) samples by commercial capillary electrophoresis (CE) is presented. Two interchangeable CE cartridges with different fused-silica capillaries were used for the DBS elutions and the DBS eluate analyses, respectively. The application of one CE cartridge with a wide-bore capillary reduced DBS processing times to a minimum (1-2 min per sample) while fitting the other CE cartridge with a narrow-bore capillary served for highly efficient CE analyses. A comprehensive investigation of major variables affecting liquid handling in CE (capillary length, internal diameter, and temperature) was carried out with the aim of optimizing both procedures and enabling their maximum flexibility. The application of two CE cartridges also enabled the employment of CE detectors with different instrumental set-ups and/or principles as was demonstrated by the optical detection of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the conductivity detection of amino acids (AAs). The presented methods were optimized for the automated CE analyses of 36 DBS samples formed by a volumetric collection of 5 μL of capillary blood onto Whatman 903 discs and processed by direct in-vial elution using the CE instrument. The precision of liquid transfers for the automated DBS elutions was better than 0.9% and the precision of CE analyses did not exceed 5.1 and 12.3% for the determination of NSAIDs and AAs, respectively. Both methods were linear (R2 ≥ 0.996) over the therapeutic (NSAIDs) and the endogenous (AAs) concentration ranges, had limits of quantification below the typical analyte concentrations in human blood, and achieved sample throughputs of more than 6 DBSs per hour.
See more in PubMed
Protti M.; Mandrioli R.; Mercolini L. Quantitative microsampling for bioanalytical applications related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Usefulness, benefits and pitfalls. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020, 191, 11359710.1016/j.jpba.2020.113597. PubMed DOI PMC
Rudge J.; Kushon S. Volumetric absorptive microsampling: its use in COVID-19 research and testing. Bioanalysis 2021, 13, 010210.4155/bio-2021-0102. PubMed DOI PMC
Li W.; Lee M. S.. Dried Blood Spots. Applications and Techniques; Wiley: East Hanover, NJ, USA, 2014; p 363.
Denniff P.; Spooner N. Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling: A Dried Sample Collection Technique for Quantitative Bioanalysis. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 8489–8495. 10.1021/ac5022562. PubMed DOI
Leuthold L. A.; Heudi O.; Deglon J.; Raccuglia M.; Augsburger M.; Picard F.; Kretz O.; Thomas A. New Microfluidic-Based Sampling Procedure for Overcoming the Hematocrit Problem Associated with Dried Blood Spot Analysis. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 2068–2071. 10.1021/ac503931g. PubMed DOI
Velghe S.; Stove C. P. Evaluation of the Capitainer-B Microfluidic Device as a New Hematocrit-Independent Alternative for Dried Blood Spot Collection. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 12893–12899. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03512. PubMed DOI
Neto R.; Gooley A.; Breadmore M. C.; Hilder E. F.; Lapierre F. Precise, accurate and user-independent blood collection system for dried blood spot sample preparation. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 3315–3323. 10.1007/s00216-018-0993-y. PubMed DOI
Luginbühl M.; Gaugler S. The application of fully automated dried blood spot analysis for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using the CAMAG DBS-MS 500 autosampler. Clin. Biochem. 2020, 82, 33–39. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.02.007. PubMed DOI
Abu-Rabie P.; Spooner N. Direct Quantitative Bioanalysis of Drugs in Dried Blood Spot Samples Using a Thin-Layer Chromatography Mass Spectrometer Interface. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 10275–10284. 10.1021/ac901985e. PubMed DOI
Abu-Rabie P. Direct analysis of DBS: emerging and desirable technologies. Bioanalysis 2011, 3, 1675–1678. 10.4155/bio.11.159. DOI
Abu-Rabie P., Direct analysis of dried blood spot samples. In Dried Blood Spots - Applications and Techniques, Li W.; Lee M. S., Eds.; Wiley: East Hanover, NJ, USA, 2014; pp 245–297.
Van Berkel G. J.; Kertesz V. Continuous-flow liquid microjunction surface sampling probe connected on-line with high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry for spatially resolved analysis of small molecules and proteins. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 27, 1329–1334. 10.1002/rcm.6580. PubMed DOI
Oliveira R. V.; Henion J.; Wickremsinhe E. Fully-Automated Approach for Online Dried Blood Spot Extraction and Bioanalysis by Two-Dimensional-Liquid Chromatography Coupled with High-Resolution Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 1246–1253. 10.1021/ac403672u. PubMed DOI
Wagner M.; Tonoli D.; Varesio E.; Hopfgartner G. The use of mass spectrometry to analyze dried blood spots. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2016, 35, 361–438. 10.1002/mas.21441. PubMed DOI
CAMAG , https://dbs.camag.com/product/camag-dbs-ms-500-hct, (last accessed May 25, 2023).
SparkHolland, https://www.sparkholland.com/portfolio-item/dbs-autosampler/, (last accessed May 25, 2023).
De Kesel P. M.; Sadones N.; Capiau S.; Lambert W. E.; Stove C. P. Hemato-critical issues in quantitative analysis of dried blood spots: challenges and solutions. Bioanalysis 2013, 5, 2023–2041. 10.4155/bio.13.156. PubMed DOI
de Vries R.; Barfield M.; van de Merbel N.; Schmid B.; Siethoff C.; Ortiz J.; Verheij E.; van Baar B.; Cobb Z.; White S.; Timmerman P. The effect of hematocrit on bioanalysis of DBS: results from the EBF DBS-microsampling consortium. Bioanalysis 2013, 5, 2147–2160. 10.4155/bio.13.170. PubMed DOI
Kadjo A. F.; Stamos B. N.; Shelor C. P.; Berg J. M.; Blount B. C.; Dasgupta P. K. Evaluation of Amount of Blood in Dry Blood Spots: Ring-Disk Electrode Conductometry. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 6531–6537. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01280. PubMed DOI
Dvořák M.; Ryšavá L.; Kubáň P. Capillary Electrophoresis with Capacitively Coupled Contactless Conductivity Detection for Quantitative Analysis of Dried Blood Spots with Unknown Blood Volume. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 1557–1564. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04845. PubMed DOI
Ryšavá L.; Dvořák M.; Kubáň P. Dried Blood Spot Self-Sampling with Automated Capillary Electrophoresis Processing for Clinical Analysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 6068–6075. 10.1002/anie.202012997. PubMed DOI
Moravčík O.; Dvořák M.; Kubáň P. Autonomous capillary electrophoresis processing and analysis of dried blood spots for high-throughput determination of uric acid. Anal. Chim. Acta 2023, 1267, 34139010.1016/j.aca.2023.341390. PubMed DOI
Schulz M.; Schmoldt A.; Andresen-Streichert H.; Iwersen-Bergmann S. Revisited: Therapeutic and toxic blood concentrations of more than 1100 drugs and other xenobiotics. Crit. Care 2020, 24, 195.10.1186/s13054-020-02915-5. PubMed DOI PMC
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/bioanalytical-method-validation. (last accessed May 25, 2023).
https://www.fda.gov/files/drugs/published/Bioanalytical-Method-Validation-Guidance-for-Industry.pdf. (last accessed May 25, 2023).
Westgard J. O.; Barry P. L.; Hunt M. R.; Groth T. A multi-rule Shewhart chart for quality control in clinical chemistry. Clin. Chem. 1981, 27, 493–501. 10.1093/clinchem/27.3.493. PubMed DOI
Tůma P. Determination of amino acids by capillary and microchip electrophoresis with contactless conductivity detection - Theory, instrumentation and applications. Talanta 2021, 224, 12192210.1016/j.talanta.2020.121922. PubMed DOI
Samcová E.; Tůma P. Determination of proteinogenic amino acids in human plasma by capillary electrophoresis with contactless conductivity detection. Electroanalysis 2006, 18, 152–157. 10.1002/elan.200503380. DOI