The article introduces an original VR-based experiment which explores context-dependent memory recall in humans. It specifically examines the recall of correct and falsely induced semantic memories. With the aid of VR head-mounted displays, 92 students of psychology were placed in a computer-generated indoor virtual environment and asked to memorize the presented lists of words. Afterwards, the participants were placed in the same indoor virtual environment or an alternative outdoor virtual environment and asked to recall the words. The number of correct and falsely induced words was then measured. On average, women recalled significantly more correct words from the list than men, regardless of the environmental context. Despite the assumptions, we did not observe a separate effect of exposure to different environments during learning and recall of material on memory performance. Likewise, we did not detect any effects of the learning context or biological sex in the case of the production of false memories. These results provide a novel insight into previous knowledge regarding the memory processes that occur in virtual environments. Although we failed to confirm the role of context in recalling learned material in general, we found a hint that this context might interact with specific memory processes of biological sexes. However, the design of this study only captured the effect of changing the environment during memory recall and did not address the role of specific context in remembering learning material. Further research is therefore needed to better investigate these phenomena and examine the role of biological sex in context-dependent memory processes.

Behavioral and Social Neuroscience Research Group CEITEC Central European Institute of Technology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Geography Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Neurology St Anne's University Hospital and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Psychology Faculty of Arts Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Institute of Psychology Czech Academy of Sciences Brno Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Loftus E. Our changeable memories: legal and practical implications. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4: 231–234. doi: 10.1038/nrn1054 PubMed DOI

Deese J. On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1959. pp. 17–22. doi: 10.1037/h0046671 PubMed DOI

Roediger HL, McDermott KB. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995;21: 803–814.

Pardilla-Delgado E, Payne JD. The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory. J Vis Exp. 2017. doi: 10.3791/54793 PubMed DOI PMC

Dodson CS, Schacter DL. “If I had said it I would have remembered it: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001;8: 155–161. doi: 10.3758/bf03196152 PubMed DOI

Gallo DA. False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion. Mem Cognit. 2010;38: 833–848. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.7.833 PubMed DOI

Arndt J, Beato MS. The role of language proficiency in producing false memories. Journal of Memory and Language. 2017. pp. 146–158.

Cabeza R, Lennartson ER. False memory across languages: implicit associative response vs fuzzy trace views. Memory. 2005;13: 1–5. doi: 10.1080/09658210344000161 PubMed DOI

Suarez M, Beato MS. The Role of Language Proficiency in False Memory: A Mini Review. Front Psychol. 2021;12: 659434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659434 PubMed DOI PMC

Coane JH, McBride DM, Huff MJ, Chang K, Marsh EM, Smith KA. Manipulations of List Type in the DRM Paradigm: A Review of How Structural and Conceptual Similarity Affect False Memory. Front Psychol. 2021;12: 668550. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668550 PubMed DOI PMC

Lyle KB, Johnson MK. Importing perceived features into false memories. Memory. 2006;14: 197–213. doi: 10.1080/09658210544000060 PubMed DOI

Roediger HL 3rd, McDermott KB, Pisoni DB, Gallo DA. Illusory recollection of voices. Memory. 2004;12: 586–602. doi: 10.1080/09658210344000125 PubMed DOI PMC

Isarida T, Isarida T. Environmental context-dependent effect of background photographs in recognition. The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association. 2014. p. 1PM–1.

Roediger HL 3rd, Watson JM, McDermott KB, Gallo DA. Factors that determine false recall: a multiple regression analysis. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001;8: 385–407. doi: 10.3758/bf03196177 PubMed DOI

Brainerd CJ, Reyna VF. Fuzzy-Trace Theory and False Memory. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2002;11: 164–169.

Godden DR, Baddeley AD. Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. Br J Psychol. 1975;66: 325–331.

Smith SM, Vela E. Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2001. pp. 203–220. doi: 10.3758/bf03196157 PubMed DOI

Eichenbaum H. Learning & memory. [cited 22 Dec 2022]. https://aabmc.org/sites/default/files/webform/stories-photos/pdf-learning--memory-howard-eichenbaum-pdf-download-free-book-3e8075a.pdf

Smith SM, Handy JD, Hernandez A, Jacoby LL. Context specificity of automatic influences of memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018;44: 1501–1513. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000523 PubMed DOI

Staudigl T, Vollmar C, Noachtar S, Hanslmayr S. Temporal-pattern similarity analysis reveals the beneficial and detrimental effects of context reinstatement on human memory. J Neurosci. 2015;35: 5373–5384. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4198-14.2015 PubMed DOI PMC

Schwoebel J, Buko D, Caissey KL. Evidence for reinstating diverse episodic contexts in retrieval-based learning. J Cogn Psychol. 2022;34: 485–496.

Essoe JK-Y, Reggente N, Ohno AA, Baek YH, Dell’Italia J, Rissman J. Enhancing learning and retention with distinctive virtual reality environments and mental context reinstatement. NPJ Sci Learn. 2022;7: 31. doi: 10.1038/s41539-022-00147-6 PubMed DOI PMC

Rocabado F, González Alonso J, Duñabeitia JA. Environment Context Variability and Incidental Word Learning: A Virtual Reality Study. Brain Sci. 2022;12. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111516 PubMed DOI PMC

Murnane K, Phelps MP, Malmberg K. Context-dependent recognition memory: the ICE theory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999;128: 403–415. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.128.4.403 PubMed DOI

Smith SM, Manzano I. Video context-dependent recall. Behav Res Methods. 2010;42: 292–301. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.292 PubMed DOI

Kwartler M. Visualization in support of public participation. Visualization in landscape and environmental planning. London: Taylor & Francis; 2005.

Parsons TD. Virtual Reality for Enhanced Ecological Validity and Experimental Control in the Clinical, Affective and Social Neurosciences. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9: 660. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00660 PubMed DOI PMC

Reggente N, Essoe JK-Y, Aghajan ZM, Tavakoli AV, McGuire JF, Suthana NA, et al.. Enhancing the Ecological Validity of fMRI Memory Research Using Virtual Reality. Front Neurosci. 2018;12: 408. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00408 PubMed DOI PMC

Paradis M-A, Nicolas T, Gaugne R, Barreau J-B, Auger R, Gouranton V. Making virtual archeology great again (without scientific compromise). ISPRS—Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 2019;XLII-2/W15: 879–886.

Alcañiz M, Rey B, Tembl J, Parkhutik V. A neuroscience approach to virtual reality experience using transcranial Doppler monitoring. Presence. 2009;18: 97–111.

Richardson AE, Montello DR, Hegarty M. Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory & Cognition. 1999. pp. 741–750. doi: 10.3758/bf03211566 PubMed DOI

Wilson JR. Virtual environments and ergonomics: needs and opportunities. Ergonomics. 1997. pp. 1057–1077.

Sherman WR, Craig AB. Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application, and Design. Elsevier Science; 2018.

Hirose M, Schmalstieg D, Wingrave CA. Higher levels of immersion improve procedure memorization performance. Proceedings of the 15th. Joint virtual reality Eurographics conference on Virtual Environments. 2009.

Sowndararajan A, Kopper R, Bowman DA. The effects of higher levels of immersion on procedure memorization performance and implications for educational virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 2010;19: 527–543.

Krokos E, Plaisant C, Varshney A. Virtual memory palaces: immersion aids recall. Virtual Real. 2019;23: 1–15.

Wälti MJ, Woolley DG, Wenderoth N. Reinstating verbal memories with virtual contexts: Myth or reality? PLoS One. 2019;14: e0214540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214540 PubMed DOI PMC

Shin YS, Masís-Obando R, Keshavarzian N, Dáve R, Norman KA. Context-dependent memory effects in two immersive virtual reality environments: On Mars and underwater. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021;28: 574–582. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01835-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Goodwin KA. Reducing false memories via context reinstatement: the roles of encoding and retrieval contexts. Am J Psychol. 2013;126: 213–225. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.2.0213 PubMed DOI

Woods JA, Dewhurst SA. Putting false memories into context: the effects of odour contexts on correct and false recall. Memory. 2019;27: 379–386. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1512632 PubMed DOI

Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C, Ekstrom AD, Wiltgen BJ. A contextual binding theory of episodic memory: systems consolidation reconsidered. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019;20: 364–375. doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0150-4 PubMed DOI PMC

Loprinzi PD, Frith E. The Role of Sex in Memory Function: Considerations and Recommendations in the Context of Exercise. J Clin Med Res. 2018;7. doi: 10.3390/jcm7060132 PubMed DOI PMC

Postma A, Jager G, Kessels RPC, Koppeschaar HPF, van Honk J. Sex differences for selective forms of spatial memory. Brain Cogn. 2004;54: 24–34. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00238-0 PubMed DOI

Hamson DK, Roes MM, Galea LAM. Sex Hormones and Cognition: Neuroendocrine influences on memory and learning. The University of British Columbia; 2018. PubMed

LaViola JJ. A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. SIGCHI Bull. 2000;32: 47–56.

Stadler MA, Roediger HL 3rd, McDermott KB. Norms for word lists that create false memories. Mem Cognit. 1999;27: 494–500. doi: 10.3758/bf03211543 PubMed DOI

Lanen M, Lamers MH. Context-Dependent Memory in Real and Virtual Reality. Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality. Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 177–189.

Fernandez A, Glenberg AM. Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory. Mem Cognit. 1985;13: 333–345. doi: 10.3758/bf03202501 PubMed DOI

Hochmitz I, Yuviler-Gavish N. Physical fidelity versus cognitive fidelity training in procedural skills acquisition. Hum Factors. 2011;53: 489–501. doi: 10.1177/0018720811412777 PubMed DOI

Moore JW. What Is the Sense of Agency and Why Does it Matter? Front Psychol. 2016;7: 1272. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01272 PubMed DOI PMC

HTC Corporation. Unity Asset Store Manual [Internet]. 2020 [cited 7 March 2023]. https://assetstore.unity.com/.

Unity Technologies. In: Unity Asset Store [Internet]. 2021 [cited 7 March 2023]. https://assetstore.unity.com/.

Ugwitz P, Herman L, Stachoň Z. 3D Visualization of Historical Buildings: Methods, Their Utility in the Tourism Industry and Beyond. Regionální Rozvoj Mezi Teorií a Praxí. 2021;1: 43–62.

Ugwitz P, Šašinková A, Šašinka Č, Stachoň Z, Juřík V. Toggle toolkit: A tool for conducting experiments in unity virtual environments. Behav Res Methods. 2021;53: 1581–1591. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01510-4 PubMed DOI

Kirby KN, Gerlanc D. BootES: an R package for bootstrap confidence intervals on effect sizes. Behav Res Methods. 2013;45: 905–927. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0330-5 PubMed DOI

Nouza J, Zdansky J, Cerva P, Silovsky J. Challenges in Speech Processing of Slavic Languages (Case Studies in Speech Recognition of Czech and Slovak). In: Esposito A, Campbell N, Vogel C, Hussain A, Nijholt A, editors. Development of Multimodal Interfaces: Active Listening and Synchrony: Second COST 2102 International Training School, Dublin, Ireland, March 23–27, 2009, Revised Selected Papers. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2010. pp. 225–241.

R Core Team. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2015. http://www.R-project.org/

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4. arXiv [stat.CO]. 2014. http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823

Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. J Stat Softw. 2017;82: 1–26.

Jund T, Capobianco A, Larue F. Impact of Frame of Reference on Memorization in Virtual Environments. 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT). 2016. pp. 533–537.