BACKGROUND: Although there is evidence that shows worse cognitive functioning in male patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), the role of brain pathology in this context is under-investigated. OBJECTIVE: To investigate sex differences in cognitive performance of MS patients, in the context of brain pathology and disease burden. METHODS: Brain MRI, neurological examination, neuropsychological assessment (Brief International Cognitive Assessment in MS-BICAMS, and Paced Auditory Verbal Learning Test-PASAT), and patient-reported outcome questionnaires were performed/administered in 1052 MS patients. RESULTS: Females had higher raw scores in the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) (57.0 vs. 54.0; p < 0.001) and Categorical Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) (63.0 vs. 57.0; p < 0.001), but paradoxically, females evaluated their cognitive performance by MS Neuropsychological Questionnaire as being worse (16.6 vs 14.5, p = 0.004). Females had a trend for a weaker negative correlation between T2 lesion volume and SDMT ([Formula: see text] = - 0.37 in females vs. - 0.46 in men; interaction p = 0.038). On the other hand, women had a trend for a stronger correlation between Brain Parenchymal Fraction (BPF) and a visual memory test (Spearman's [Formula: see text] = 0.31 vs. 0.21; interaction p = 0.016). All these trends were not significant after correction for false discovery rate. CONCLUSIONS: Although, females consider their cognition as worse, males had at a group level slightly worse verbal memory and information processing speed. However, the sex differences in cognitive performance were smaller than the variability of scores within the same sex group. Brain MRI measures did not explain the sex differences in cognitive performance among MS patients.

Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience 1st Faculty of Medicine Multiple Sclerosis Center Charles University and General University Hospital Katerinska 30 120 00 Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo State University of New York Buffalo NY USA

Department of Physiotherapy Faculty of Health Care University of Presov Prešov Slovak Republic

Department of Radiology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Benedict RHB, Amato MP, DeLuca J, Geurts JJG (2020) Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: clinical management, MRI, and therapeutic avenues. The Lancet Neurology 19(10):860–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30277-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F (1991) Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology 41 (5):685–691. doi: https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.41.5.685

Rao SM (1990) A manual for the brief repeatable battery of neuropsychological tests in multiple sclerosis. National Multiple Sclerosis Society, New York

Benedict RHB, Cookfair D, Gavett R, Gunther M, Munschauer F, Garg N, Weinstock-Guttman B (2006) Validity of the minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis (MACFIMS). J Int Neuropsycholog Soc. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617706060723 DOI

Benedict RH, Amato MP, Boringa J, Brochet B, Foley F, Fredrikson S, Hamalainen P, Hartung H, Krupp L, Penner I, Reder AT, Langdon D (2012) Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS): international standards for validation. BMC Neurol 12:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-12-55 PubMed DOI PMC

Langdon DW, Amato MP, Boringa J, Brochet B, Foley F, Fredrikson S, Hamalainen P, Hartung HP, Krupp L, Penner IK, Reder AT, Benedict RH (2012) Recommendations for a Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS). Mult Scler 18(6):891–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458511431076 PubMed DOI PMC

Benedict RH, Zivadinov R (2011) Risk factors for and management of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 7(6):332–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2011.61 PubMed DOI

Sumowski JF, Benedict R, Enzinger C, Filippi M, Geurts JJ, Hamalainen P, Hulst H, Inglese M, Leavitt VM, Rocca MA, Rosti-Otajarvi EM, Rao S (2018) Cognition in multiple sclerosis: state of the field and priorities for the future. Neurology 90(6):278–288. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004977 PubMed DOI PMC

Jorm A, Anstey K, Christensen H, Rodgers B (2004) Gender differences in cognitive abilities: the mediating role of health state and health habits. Intelligence 32:7–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2003.08.001 DOI

Roivainen E (2011) Gender differences in processing speed: a review of recent research. Learn Individ Differ 21:145–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.021 DOI

Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D (2012) Neuropsychological assessment, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York

Strober LB, Bruce JM, Arnett PA, Alschuler KN, Lebkuecher A, Di Benedetto M, Cozart J, Thelen J, Guty E, Roman C (2020) A new look at an old test: Normative data of the symbol digit modalities test –Oral version. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 43:102154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2020.102154 PubMed DOI

Goretti B, Niccolai C, Hakiki B, Sturchio A, Falautano M, Minacapelli E, Martinelli V, Incerti C, Nocentini U, Murgia M, Fenu G, Cocco E, Marrosu MG, Garofalo E, Ambra FI, Maddestra M, Consalvo M, Viterbo RG, Trojano M, Losignore NA, Zimatore GB, Pietrolongo E, Lugaresi A, Langdon D, Portaccio E, Amato MP (2014) The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS): normative values with gender, age and education corrections in the Italian population. BMC Neurol 14:171. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-014-0171-6 PubMed DOI PMC

Voskuhl RR, Patel K, Paul F, Gold SM, Scheel M, Kuchling J, Cooper G, Asseyer S, Chien C, Brandt AU, Meyer CE, Mackenzie-Graham A (2020) Sex differences in brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Biol Sex Differ. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-020-00326-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Voskuhl RR (2020) The effect of sex on multiple sclerosis risk and disease progression. Mult Scler J 26(5):554–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458519892491 DOI

Gilli F, DiSano KD, Pachner AR (2020) SeXX matters in multiple sclerosis. Front Neurol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00616 PubMed DOI PMC

Koch M, Kingwell E, Rieckmann P, Tremlett H (2010) The natural history of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81(9):1039–1043. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2010.208173 PubMed DOI

Savettieri G, Messina D, Andreoli V, Bonavita S, Caltagirone C, Cittadella R, Farina D, Fazio MC, Girlanda P, Le Pira F, Liguori M, Lugaresi A, Nocentini U, Reggio A, Salemi G, Tedeschi G, Trojano M, Valentino P, Quattrone A (2004) Gender-related effect of clinical and genetic variables on the cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 251(10):1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-004-0508-y PubMed DOI

Amato MP, Portaccio E, Goretti B, Zipoli V, Ricchiuti L, De Caro MF, Patti F, Vecchio R, Sorbi S, Trojano M (2006) The Rao’s Brief Repeatable Battery and Stroop Test: normative values with age, education and gender corrections in an Italian population. Mult Scler 12(6):787–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458506070933 PubMed DOI

Beatty WW, Aupperle RL (2002) Sex differences in cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neuropsychol 16(4):472–480. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.16.4.472.13904 PubMed DOI

Schoonheim MM, Popescu V, Rueda Lopes FC, Wiebenga OT, Vrenken H, Douw L, Polman CH, Geurts JJG, Barkhof F (2012) Subcortical atrophy and cognition: sex effects in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 79(17):1754–1761. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182703f46 PubMed DOI

Schoonheim MM, Vigeveno RM, Lopes FCR, Pouwels PJW, Polman CH, Barkhof F, Geurts JJG (2014) Sex-specific extent and severity of white matter damage in multiple sclerosis: implications for cognitive decline. Hum Brain Mapp 35(5):2348–2358. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22332 PubMed DOI

Uher T, Krasensky J, Vaneckova M, Sobisek L, Seidl Z, Havrdova E, Bergsland N, Dwyer MG, Horakova D, Zivadinov R (2017) A novel semiautomated pipeline to measure brain atrophy and lesion burden in multiple sclerosis: a long-term comparative study. J Neuroimaging 27(6):620–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.12445 PubMed DOI

Uher T, Krasensky J, Sobisek L, Blahova Dusankova J, Seidl Z, Kubala Havrdova E, Sormani MP, Horakova D, Kalincik T, Vaneckova M (2018) Cognitive clinico-radiological paradox in early stages of multiple sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 5(1):81–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.512 PubMed DOI

Uher T, Vaneckova M, Sormani MP, Krasensky J, Sobisek L, Dusankova JB, Seidl Z, Havrdova E, Kalincik T, Benedict RH, Horakova D (2017) Identification of multiple sclerosis patients at highest risk of cognitive impairment using an integrated brain magnetic resonance imaging assessment approach. Eur J Neurol 24(2):292–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13200 PubMed DOI

Dusankova JB, Kalincik T, Havrdova E, Benedict RH (2012) Cross cultural validation of the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis (MACFIMS) and the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS). Clin Neuropsychol 26(7):1186–1200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2012.725101 PubMed DOI

Smith A (1982) Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT): Manual. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles

Bezdíček O, Preiss M (2009) Kalifornský test verbálního učení – druhé vydání: Psychometrická analýza českého převodu. Československá psychologie LIII 6:573–586

Benedict R (1997) Brief visuospatial memory test—revised: professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc, Odessa

Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG (1988) Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 8(1):77–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5 DOI

Benedict RH, Munschauer F, Linn R, Miller C, Murphy E, Foley F, Jacobs L (2003) Screening for multiple sclerosis cognitive impairment using a self-administered 15-item questionnaire. Mult Scler J 9(1):95–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1352458503ms861oa DOI

R Core Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 4.2.2. edn. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

IBM Corp. (2013) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. 22.0 edn. Armonk, NY

Barro C, Benkert P, Disanto G, Tsagkas C, Amann M, Naegelin Y, Leppert D, Gobbi C, Granziera C, Yaldizli O, Michalak Z, Wuerfel J, Kappos L, Parmar K, Kuhle J (2018) Serum neurofilament as a predictor of disease worsening and brain and spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Brain 141(8):2382–2391. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy154 PubMed DOI

Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey

Strober LB, Bruce JM, Arnett PA, Alschuler KN, Lebkuecher A, Di Benedetto M, Cozart J, Thelen J, Guty E, Roman C (2020) A new look at an old test: normative data of the symbol digit modalities test-oral version. Mult Scler Relat Disord 43:102154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2020.102154 PubMed DOI

D’Hooghe MB, De Cock A, Van Remoortel A, Benedict RHB, Eelen P, Peeters E, D’Haeseleer M, De Keyser J, Nagels G (2020) Correlations of health status indicators with perceived neuropsychological impairment and cognitive processing speed in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Scler Related Disord 39:101904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.101904 DOI

O’Brien A, Gaudino-Goering E, Shawaryn M, Komaroff E, Moore NB, DeLuca J (2007) Relationship of the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire (MSNQ) to functional, emotional, and neuropsychological outcomes. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 22(8):933–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.07.002 PubMed DOI

Kinsinger SW, Lattie E, Mohr DC (2010) Relationship between depression, fatigue, subjective cognitive impairment, and objective neuropsychological functioning in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychology 24(5):573–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019222 PubMed DOI PMC