Slittable sheath supported right ventricular pacing lead implantation in persistent left superior vena cava with absent right superior vena cava: a case report

. 2023 Aug 14 ; 17 (1) : 346. [epub] 20230814

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu kazuistiky, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid37574534

Grantová podpora
Supported by Ministry of Health Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
Czech Republic;MH CZ - DRO (FNOs/2022) Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky

Odkazy

PubMed 37574534
PubMed Central PMC10424350
DOI 10.1186/s13256-023-04073-y
PII: 10.1186/s13256-023-04073-y
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is the most common variant of systemic venous drainage. In the absence of the right superior vena cava (RSVC), implantation of a right ventricular pacing lead may be challenging. Therefore specific implantation techniques and experiences in PLSVC are worth reporting. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case report of a 90-year-old Caucasian female patient with PLSVC during single chamber pacemaker implantation due to the third-degree atrioventricular block. With common implantation techniques, we did not even reach the right ventricle. Therefore slittable CPS Direct ™ Universal sheath was employed to overcome the acute angle from PLSVC to tricuspid valve and ensure more fixation stability for longer 100-cm right ventricular lead placement. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates safe implantation of 100-cm long right ventricular bipolar active fixation pacing lead using common slittable CPS Direct ™ Universal sheath after failed attempts with "C" and "J" stylet shaped electrode. This sheath provides different angle towards tricuspid valve and more fixation stability in patient with PLSVC and absent connection to right atrium.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Toff WD, Camm AJ, Skehan JD. Single-chamber versus dual-chamber pacing for high-grade atrioventricular block. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(2):145–155. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042283. PubMed DOI

Van Gelder BM, Verberkmoes N, Nathoe R, Bracke FA. Late asymptomatic atrial lead perforation, a fortuitous finding during led extraction using thoracoscopic surveillance: a case report and review of the literature. Europace. 2016;18(12):1773–1778. PubMed

Irwin RB, Greaves M, Schmitt M. Left superior vena cava: revisited. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13(4):284–291. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes017. PubMed DOI

Sinha SK, Goel A, Razi M, Jha MJ, Mishra V, Aggarwaal P, et al. Permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with isolated persistent left superior vena cava from a righ-sided approach: technical considerations and follow-up outcome. Cardiol Res. 2019;10(1):18–23. doi: 10.14740/cr784. PubMed DOI PMC

Biffi M, Boriani G, Frabetti L, Bronzetti G, Branzi A. Left superior vena cava persistence in patients undergoing pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a 10-year experience. Chest. 2001;120(1):139–144. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.1.139. PubMed DOI

Daccarett M, Pai RK, Abedin M, Segerson NM, Hamdan MH. A novel technique for right ventricular lead placement in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava. Europace. 2007;9(3):200–201. doi: 10.1093/europace/eul183. PubMed DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...