Molecular Results and Potential Biomarkers Identified from the Phase 3 MILO/ENGOT-ov11 Study of Binimetinib versus Physician Choice of Chemotherapy in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
Status Publisher Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
P30 CA008748
NCI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
37581616
PubMed Central
PMC10570675
DOI
10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0621
PII: 728447
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE: We present the results of a post hoc tumor tissue analysis from the phase 3 MILO/ENGOT-ov11 study (NCT01849874). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Mutation/copy-number analysis was performed on tissue obtained pre-randomization. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS). Unbiased univariate analysis, Cox regression, and binary logistic regression were used to test associations between mutation status and outcomes, including PFS and binary response by local RECIST 1.1. RESULTS: MILO/ENGOT-ov11 enrolled 341 patients, ranging in age from 22 to 79, from June, 2013 to April, 2016. Patients were randomized 2:1 to binimetinib or physician's choice of chemotherapy (PCC). The most commonly altered gene was KRAS (33%). In 135 patients treated with binimetinib with response rate (RR) data, other detected MAPK pathway alterations included: NRAS (n = 11, 8.1%), BRAF V600E (n = 8, 5.9%), RAF1 (n = 2, 1.5%), and NF1 (n = 7, 5.2%). In those with and without MAPK pathway alterations, the RRs with binimetinib were 41% and 13%, respectively. PFS was significantly longer in patients with, compared with those without, MAPK pathway alterations treated with binimetinib [HR, 0.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.79]. There was a nonsignificant trend toward PFS improvement in PCC-treated patients with MAPK pathway alterations compared with those without (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.43-1.59). CONCLUSIONS: Although this hypothesis-generating analysis is limited by multiple testing, higher RRs and longer PFS were seen in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) treated with binimetinib, and to a lesser extent in those treated with PCC, who harbored MAPK pathway alterations. Somatic tumor testing should be routinely considered in patients with LGSOC and used as a future stratification factor.
Belgium and Luxemburg Gynaecological Oncology Group University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Besançon CHRU de Besançon Besançon France
Centre Léon Bérard Netsarc Network Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 Lyon France
Department of Gynaecological Oncology Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia
Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Milano Bicocca Milan Italy
Department of Urology and Gynecology Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G Pascale Napoli Italy
Gynecologic Oncology Program European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy
Internal Medicine Department University of Botswana Gaborone Botswana
Medical Oncology CHU Université Catholique de Louvain Namur Sainte Elisabeth Namur Belgium
Medical Oncology Service Donostia University Hospital San Sebastian Spain
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Weill Cornell Medical Center New York New York
Onkologisches Therapiezentrum am Krankenhaus Jerusalem Hamburg Germany
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto Ontario Canada
Sarah Cannon Research Institute Nashville Tennessee
Servicio de Oncologıa Medica Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologıa Valencia Spain
Stephenson Cancer Center at The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Oklahoma City Oklahoma
See more in PubMed
Singer G, Stöhr R, Cope L, Dehari R, Hartmann A, Cao D-F, et al. . Patterns of p53 mutations separate ovarian serous borderline tumors and low- and high-grade carcinomas and provide support for a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis: a mutational analysis with immunohistochemical correlation. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:218–24. PubMed
Kurman RJ, Shih IeM. The dualistic model of ovarian carcinogenesis: revisited, revised, and expanded. Am J Pathol 2016;186:733–47. PubMed PMC
Smalley I, Smalley KSM. ERK inhibition: a new front in the war against MAPK pathway-driven cancers? Cancer Discov 2018;8:140–2. PubMed
Wong K-K, Tsang YTM, Deavers MT, Mok SC, Zu Z, Sun C, et al. . BRAF mutation is rare in advanced-stage low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas. Am J Pathol 2010;177:1611–7. PubMed PMC
Grisham RN, Iyer G, Garg K, DeLair D, Hyman DM, Zhou Q, et al. . BRAF mutation is associated with early-stage disease and improved outcome in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer. Cancer 2013;119:548–54. PubMed PMC
Hunter SM, Anglesio MS, Ryland GL, Sharma R, Chiew Y-E, Rowley SM, et al. . Molecular profiling of low grade serous ovarian tumours identifies novel candidate driver genes. Oncotarget 2015;6:37663–77. PubMed PMC
Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Busschaert P, Laenen A, Moerman P, Han SN, Neven P, et al. . Loss of 1p36.33 frequent in low-grade serous ovarian cancer. Neoplasia 2019;21:582–90. PubMed PMC
Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Bodurka D, Coleman RL, Lu KH, Sood AK, et al. . Recurrent low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma is relatively chemoresistant. Gynecol Oncol 2009;114:48–52. PubMed
Grisham RN, Sylvester BE, Won H, McDermott G, DeLair D, Ramirez R, et al. . Extreme outlier analysis identifies occult mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway mutations in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:4099–105. PubMed PMC
Farley J, Brady WE, Vathipadiekal V, Lankes HA, Coleman R, Morgan MA, et al. . Selumetinib in women with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:134–40. PubMed PMC
Gershenson DM, Miller A, Brady WE, Paul J, Carty K, Rodgers W, et al. . Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS): an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet 2022;399:541–53. PubMed PMC
Monk BJ, Grisham RN, Banerjee S, Kalbacher E, Mirza MR, Romero I, et al. . MILO/ENGOT-ov11: binimetinib versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent or persistent low-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneum. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:3753–62. PubMed PMC
Armstrong DK, Alvarez RD, Backes FJ, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Barroilhet L, Behbakht K, et al. . NCCN guidelines(R) insights: ovarian cancer, version 3.2022. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022;20:972–80. PubMed
Manning-Geist B, Gordhandas S, Liu YL, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Da Cruz Paula A, et al. . MAPK pathway genetic alterations are associated with prolonged overall survival in low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2022;28:4456–65. PubMed PMC
Braicu C, Buse M, Busuioc C, Drula R, Gulei D, Raduly L, et al. . A comprehensive review on MAPK: a promising therapeutic target in cancer. Cancers 2019;11:1618. PubMed PMC
Mathur MB, VanderWeele TJ. R function for additive interaction measures. Epidemiology 2018;29:e5–e6. PubMed PMC
Cheasley D, Nigam A, Zethoven M, Hunter S, Etemadmoghadam D, Semple T, et al. . Genomic analysis of low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma to identify key drivers and therapeutic vulnerabilities. J Pathol 2021;253:41–54. PubMed
Gershenson DM. Low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum. Ann Oncol 2016;27:i45–9. PubMed
Grabowski JP, Harter P, Heitz F, Pujade-Lauraine E, Reuss A, Kristensen G, et al. . Operability and chemotherapy responsiveness in advanced low-grade serous ovarian cancer. An analysis of the AGO study group metadatabase. Gynecol Oncol 2016;140:457–62. PubMed
Plaxe SC. Epidemiology of low-grade serous ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:459. PubMed
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 2011;474:609–15. PubMed PMC
Singer G, Oldt R, Cohen Y, Wang BG, Sidransky D, Kurman RJ, et al. . Mutations in BRAF and KRAS characterize the development of low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:484–6. PubMed
Emmanuel C, Chiew Y-E, George J, Etemadmoghadam D, Anglesio MS, Sharma R, et al. . Genomic classification of serous ovarian cancer with adjacent borderline differentiates RAS pathway and TP53-mutant tumors and identifies NRAS as an oncogenic driver. Clin Cancer Res 2014;20:6618–30. PubMed
Chui MH, Chang JC, Zhang Y, Zehir A, Schram AM, Konner J, et al. . Spectrum of BRAF mutations and gene rearrangements in ovarian serous carcinoma. JCO Precis Oncol 2021;5:PO.21.00055. PubMed PMC
Guo C, Chénard-Poirier M, Roda D, de Miguel M, Harris SJ, Candilejo IM, et al. . Intermittent schedules of the oral RAF–MEK inhibitor CH5126766/VS-6766 in patients with RAS/RAF-mutant solid tumours and multiple myeloma: a single-centre, open-label, phase 1 dose-escalation and basket dose-expansion study. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:1478–88. PubMed
Jänne PA, Smith I, McWalter G, Mann H, Dougherty B, Walker J, et al. . Impact of KRAS codon subtypes from a randomised phase II trial of selumetinib plus docetaxel in KRAS mutant advanced non–small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2015;113:199–203. PubMed PMC
Ihle NT, Byers LA, Kim ES, Saintigny P, Lee JJ, Blumenschein GR, et al. . Effect of KRAS oncogene substitutions on protein behavior: implications for signaling and clinical outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012;104:228–39. PubMed PMC
Tsang YT, Deavers MT, Sun CC, Kwan S‐Y, Kuo E, Malpica A, et al. . KRAS (but not BRAF) mutations in ovarian serous borderline tumour are associated with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma. J Pathol 2013;231:449–56. PubMed PMC
Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Westin SN, Eyada M, Cobb LP, Nathan LC, et al. . The genomic landscape of low-grade serous ovarian/peritoneal carcinoma and its impact on clinical outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2022;165:560–7. PubMed
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01849874