Computed Tomography Versus Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients With Diabetes and Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu multicentrická studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
37725834
PubMed Central
PMC10879471
DOI
10.2337/dc23-0710
PII: 153644
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- bolesti na hrudi MeSH
- CT angiografie MeSH
- diabetes mellitus * epidemiologie MeSH
- koronární angiografie metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nemoci koronárních tepen * diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To compare cardiac computed tomography (CT) with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the initial strategy in patients with diabetes and stable chest pain. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This prespecified analysis of the multicenter DISCHARGE trial in 16 European countries was performed in patients with stable chest pain and intermediate pretest probability of coronary artery disease. The primary end point was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke), and the secondary end point was expanded MACE (including transient ischemic attacks and major procedure-related complications). RESULTS: Follow-up at a median of 3.5 years was available in 3,541 patients of whom 557 (CT group n = 263 vs. ICA group n = 294) had diabetes and 2,984 (CT group n = 1,536 vs. ICA group n = 1,448) did not. No statistically significant diabetes interaction was found for MACE (P = 0.45), expanded MACE (P = 0.35), or major procedure-related complications (P = 0.49). In both patients with and without diabetes, the rate of MACE did not differ between CT and ICA groups. In patients with diabetes, the expanded MACE end point occurred less frequently in the CT group than in the ICA group (3.8% [10 of 263] vs. 8.2% [24 of 294], hazard ratio [HR] 0.45 [95% CI 0.22-0.95]), as did the major procedure-related complication rate (0.4% [1 of 263] vs. 2.7% [8 of 294], HR 0.30 [95% CI 0.13 - 0.63]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes referred for ICA for the investigation of stable chest pain, a CT-first strategy compared with an ICA-first strategy showed no difference in MACE and may potentially be associated with a lower rate of expanded MACE and major procedure-related complications.
Administrative Centre Health Care District of Southwestern Finland Turku Finland
Bavarian Cancer Registry Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority Munich Germany
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
Berlin University Alliance Berlin Germany
Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red CIBERCV Madrid Spain
County Clinical Emergency Hospital Targu Mures Targu Mures Romania
Department of Cardiology Aintree University Hospital Liverpool U K
Department of Cardiology Alb Fils Kliniken Göppingen Germany
Department of Cardiology Basurto Hospital Bilbao Spain
Department of Cardiology Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia Espinho Vila Nova de Gaia Portugal
Department of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre Hvidovre Denmark
Department of Cardiology Herlev Gentofte Hospital Hellerup Denmark
Department of Cardiology Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina Novi Sad Serbia
Department of Cardiology Internal Medicine Clinic Clinical Hospital Center Zemun Belgrade Serbia
Department of Cardiology Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool U K
Department of Cardiology Motol University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Cardiology Nordsjællands Hospital University of Copenhagen Hillerød Denmark
Department of Cardiology Paul Stradins Clinical University Hospital University of Latvia Riga Latvia
Department of Cardiology Provincial Specialist Hospital in Wrocław Wrocław Poland
Department of Cardiology Southeastern Health and Social Care Trust Belfast U K
Department of Cardiology St Vincent's University Hospital Dublin Ireland
Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Department of Public Health and Primary Care at Cambridge University Cambridge U K
Department of Radiological Sciences Sapienza University of Rome Italy
Department of Radiology Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Cagliari Italy
Department of Radiology Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
Department of Radiology Provincial Specialist Hospital in Wrocław Wrocław Poland
Department of Radiology St Vincent's University Hospital Dublin Ireland
Department of Radiology University of Leipzig Heart Centre Leipzig Germany
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Berlin Germany
Edge Hill University Ormskirk U K
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool U K
Faculty of Medicine University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia
Faculty of Medicine University of Novi Sad Novi Sad Serbia
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research Partner Site Berlin Germany
Golden Jubilee National Hospital Clydebank U K
Heart and Vascular Center Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Institute for Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital Liverpool U K
National Institute of Cardiology Warsaw Poland
School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health University of Glasgow Glasgow U K
School of Medicine University College Dublin Dublin Ireland
Turku PET Centre Turku University Hospital and University of Turku Turku Finland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Cheng YJ, Imperatore G, Geiss LS, et al. . Trends and disparities in cardiovascular mortality among U.S. adults with and without self-reported diabetes, 1988–2015. Diabetes Care 2018;41:2306–2315 PubMed PMC
Nanayakkara N, Curtis AJ, Heritier S, et al. . Impact of age at type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis on mortality and vascular complications: systematic review and meta-analyses. Diabetologia 2021;64:275–287 PubMed PMC
Cowie CC, Casagrande SS, Geiss LS, et al. ., Eds. Diabetes in America. 3rd ed. Bethesda, MD, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2018 PubMed
Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, et al. .; ESC Scientific Document Group . 2019 ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J 2020;41:255–323 PubMed
Rana JS, Dunning A, Achenbach S, et al. . Differences in prevalence, extent, severity, and prognosis of coronary artery disease among patients with and without diabetes undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography: results from 10,110 individuals from the CONFIRM (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes): an InteRnational Multicenter Registry. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1787–1794 PubMed PMC
Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. .; ESC National Cardiac Societies; ESC Scientific Document Group . 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J 2021;42:3227–3337 PubMed
Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al. .; ISCHEMIA Research Group . Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1395–1407 PubMed PMC
Newman JD, Anthopolos R, Mancini GBJ, et al. . Outcomes of participants with diabetes in the ISCHEMIA trials. Circulation 2021;144:1380–1395 PubMed PMC
Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. .; ESC Scientific Document Group . 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2020;41:407–477 PubMed
Kammerlander AA, Mayrhofer T, Ferencik M, et al. .; PROMISE Investigators . Association of metabolic phenotypes with coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events in patients with stable chest pain. Diabetes Care 2021;44:1038–1045 PubMed PMC
Sharma A, Coles A, Sekaran NK, et al. . Stress testing versus CT angiography in patients with diabetes and suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:893–902 PubMed PMC
Maurovich-Horvat P, Bosserdt M, Kofoed KF, et al. .; DISCHARGE Trial Group . CT or invasive coronary angiography in stable chest pain. N Engl J Med 2022;386:1591–1602 PubMed
Napp AE, Haase R, Laule M, et al. .; DISCHARGE Trial Group . Computed tomography versus invasive coronary angiography: design and methods of the pragmatic randomised multicentre DISCHARGE trial. Eur Radiol 2017;27:2957–2968 PubMed
Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, et al. .; European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR); ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG) . European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J 2012;33:1635–1701 PubMed
Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, et al. .; Task Force Members; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines; Document Reviewers . 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2949–3003 PubMed
Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. . ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1756–1824 PubMed
Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. .; Authors/Task Force Members . 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014;35:2541–2619 PubMed
Cho L, Vest AR, O’Donoghue ML, et al. .; Cardiovascular Disease in Women Committee Leadership Council . Increasing participation of women in cardiovascular trials: JACC council perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;78:737–751 PubMed
Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. .; Writing Committee Members . 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;78:2218–2261 PubMed
Nauta ST, Deckers JW, Akkerhuis KM, van Domburg RT. Short- and long-term mortality after myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes: changes from 1985 to 2008. Diabetes Care 2012;35:2043–2047 PubMed PMC
Newby DE, Adamson PD, Berry C, et al. .; SCOT-HEART Investigators . Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2018;379:924–933 PubMed