We redescribe the holotype and only known specimen of the early eureptile Coelostegus prothales from the Upper Carboniferous of the Czech Republic using photogrammetric scanning and a virtual 3D rendition of its skull. New information is available on several skull and lower jaw bones, including the postorbital, supratemporal, tabular, postparietal, angular, and prearticular. The new data also permit the correct identification of previously undetected or mis-identified elements (e.g., supratemporal; quadratojugal; angular). We provide an amended diagnosis of Coelostegus and a new reconstruction of the skull in dorsal and lateral views. To evaluate the affinities of Coelostegus, we code this taxon in two recently published taxon-character matrices. Parsimony and Bayesian analyses do not permit firm conclusions on the phylogenetic position of Coelostegus or, indeed, the status and extrinsic relationships of protorothyridid amniotes. Coelostegus emerges either as the sister taxon to the recently redefined Diapsida (Araeoscelidia; Varanopidae; Parareptilia; Neodiapsida), as one of the most basal protorothyridids, or as a derived stem-group amniote in various parsimony-based analyses, or as the basalmost protorothyridid in one Bayesian analysis, with protorothyridids forming a paraphyletic array relative to Diapsida. We review the cranial similarities and differences between Coelostegus and other protorothyridid genera and discuss the implications that various phylogenetic results have for our understanding of early amniote relationships.

Department of Biological Sciences University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

Department of Ecology Laboratory of Evolutionary Biology Faculty of Natural Sciences Comenius University in Bratislava Bratislava Slovakia

Department of Life Sciences Joseph Banks Laboratories University of Lincoln Lincoln United Kingdom

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

Institute of Measurement Science Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava Slovakia

Scanstudio s r o Bratislava Slovakia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Olson EC. The family Diadectidae and its bearing on the classification of reptiles. Fieldiana (Geology) 1947; 11:1–53.

Carroll RL. A Middle Pennsylvanian captorhinomorph, and the interrelationships of primitive reptiles. J Paleont. 1969; 43:151–170.

Carroll RL, Baird D. Carboniferous stem reptiles of the family Romeriidae. Bull Mus Comp Zool, Harvard University. 1972; 143:321–363.

Clark J, Carroll RL. Romeriid reptiles from the Lower Permian. Bull Mus Comp Zool, Harvard University. 1973; 144:353–407.

Carroll RL. The earliest reptiles. J Linn Soc (Zool). 1964; 45:5–83.

Müller J, Reisz RR. The phylogeny of early eureptiles: comparing parsimony and Bayesian approaches in the investigation of a basal fossil clade. Syst Biol. 2006; 55:503–511. doi: 10.1080/10635150600755396 PubMed DOI

Ford DP, Benson RB. The phylogeny of early amniotes and the affinities of Parareptilia and Varanopidae. Nature Ecol Evol. 2020; 4:57–65. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-1047-3 PubMed DOI

Simöes TR, Kammerer ChF, Caldwell MW, Pierce SE. Successive climate crises in the deep past drove the early evolution and radiation of reptiles. Sci Advan. 2022; 8, eabg 1898:1–13. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq1898 PubMed DOI PMC

Carroll RL. The ancestry of reptiles. Phil Trans R Soc London B. 1970; 257:267–308.

Klembara J, Clack J, Milner AR, Ruta M. Cranial anatomy, ontogeny and relationships of the Late Carboniferous tetrapod Gephyrostegus bohemicus Jaekel, 1902. J Vert Paleont. 2014; 34:774–792.

Brough MC, Brough J. The genus Gephyrostegus. Phil Trans R Soc London B. 1967; 252:147–165.

Danto M, Witzmann F, Müller J. Redescription and phylogenetic relationships of Solenodonsaurus janenschi Broili, 1924, from the Late Carboniferous of Nýřany, Czech Republic. Fossil Rec. 2012; 15:45–59.

Swofford DL. PAUP∗ Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (∗and other methods). 1998; Version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985; 39:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x PubMed DOI

Farris JS, Albert VA, Källersjö M, Lipscomb D, Kluge AG. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbour-joining. Cladistics. 1996; 12:99–124. PubMed

Goloboff P. Estimating character weighting during tree search. Cladistics. 1993; 9:83–91. PubMed

Goloboff P, Torres A, Arias S. Weighted parsimony outperforms other methods of phylogenetic inference under models appropriate for morphology. Cladistics. 2018; 34:407–437. doi: 10.1111/cla.12205 PubMed DOI

Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19:1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 PubMed DOI

Jaekel O. Ueber Gephyrostegus bohemicus n. g. n. sp. Zeit deutsch geol Gesel. 1902; 54:127–132.

Sumida SS, Lombard RE. The atlas-axis complex in the late Paleozoic genus Diadectes and the characteristics of the atlas-axis complex across the amphibian to amniote transition. J Paleont. 1991; 65:973–983.

Mann A, McDaniel EJ, McColville ER, Maddin HC. Carbonodraco lundi gen et sp. nov., the oldest parareptile, from Linton, ohio, and new insights into the early radiation of reptiles. R Soc Open Sci. 2019; 6:191191. PubMed PMC

Klembara J, Berman DS, Henrici AC, Martens T, Hain M. Reconstruction of the skull and description of new anatomical features of Diadectes absitus (Diadectidae, Diadectomorpha) from the early Permian of central Germany. Earth Environ Sci Trans R Soc Edinburgh. 2022; 113:267–278.

Berman DS, Sumida SS, Lombard RE. Reinterpretation of the temporal and occipital regions in Diadectes and the relationships of diadectomorphs Germany. J Paleont. 1992; 66:481–499.