Association of Selinexor Dose Reductions With Clinical Outcomes in the BOSTON Study
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu randomizované kontrolované studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
37743180
DOI
10.1016/j.clml.2023.08.018
PII: S2152-2650(23)00279-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Adverse events, Multiple myeloma, Quality of life, Response,
- MeSH
- dexamethason terapeutické užití MeSH
- kvalita života * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom * farmakoterapie MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie terapeutické užití MeSH
- vysazování léků MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- dexamethason MeSH
- selinexor MeSH Prohlížeč
BACKGROUND: Dose modifications in response to adverse events (AEs) can maintain tumor response and improve therapy tolerability. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the efficacy and safety of reduced selinexor doses in the BOSTON trial (NCT03110562). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) in 195 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma randomized to once-weekly (QW) selinexor (100 mg), QW subcutaneous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2), and twice-weekly dexamethasone (20 mg) were compared between patients with dose reductions and those without. RESULTS: In total, 126 patients (65%) had selinexor dose reductions (median dose 71.4 mg/wk). In patients with dose reductions versus those without median progression-free survival was 16.6 months (95% CI 12.9-not evaluable [NE]) versus 9.2 months [95% CI 6.8-15.5]), overall response rate was 81.7% (95% CI 73.9-88.1%) versus 66.7% (95% CI 54.3-77.6%), ≥very good partial response was (51.6% [95% CI 42.5-60.6%] vs. 31.9% [95% CI 21.2-44.2]), median duration of response was not reached (95% CI 13.8-NE) versus 12.0 months (95% CI 8.3-NE), and time to next treatment was 22.6 months (95% CI 14.6-NE) versus 10.5 months (95% CI 6.3-18.2). Mean best change from baseline on the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QoL scale was 10.0 ± 20.5 versus 4.0 ± 20.9. Duration-adjusted AE rates that were lower after selinexor dose reduction included thrombocytopenia (62.5% before vs. 47.6% after), nausea (31.6% vs. 7.3%), fatigue (28.1% vs. 9.9%), decreased appetite (21.5% vs. 6.4%), anemia (17.9% vs. 10.3%), and diarrhea (12.9% vs. 5.2%). CONCLUSION: Appropriate dose reductions in response to AEs of the 100 mg selinexor starting dose in the BOSTON study were associated with improved efficacy, reduced AE rates and improved QoL.
Charles University and General Hospital Prague Czech Republic
General Hospital Evangelismos Athens Greece
Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc Newton MA
Medical University of Silesia Katowice Poland
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine Athens Greece
Tisch Cancer Institute Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03110562