Combining Asian and European genome-wide association studies of colorectal cancer improves risk prediction across racial and ethnic populations
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Grantová podpora
R01 CA059045
NCI NIH HHS - United States
25514
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
R01 CA206279
NCI NIH HHS - United States
MC_U127527198
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
U01 CA137088
NCI NIH HHS - United States
U01 CA206110
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA244588
NCI NIH HHS - United States
P30 CA008748
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA201407
NCI NIH HHS - United States
MC_PC_U127527198
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
U01 HG008657
NHGRI NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA273198
NCI NIH HHS - United States
U01 CA164930
NCI NIH HHS - United States
U01 CA261339
NCI NIH HHS - United States
U01 CA185094
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA263318
NCI NIH HHS - United States
18927
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
MC_UU_00007/1
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
001
World Health Organization - International
PubMed
37783704
PubMed Central
PMC10545678
DOI
10.1038/s41467-023-41819-0
PII: 10.1038/s41467-023-41819-0
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- celogenomová asociační studie MeSH
- etnicita * genetika MeSH
- genetická predispozice k nemoci MeSH
- jednonukleotidový polymorfismus MeSH
- kolorektální nádory * diagnóza genetika MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- multifaktoriální dědičnost MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have great potential to guide precision colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention by identifying those at higher risk to undertake targeted screening. However, current PRS using European ancestry data have sub-optimal performance in non-European ancestry populations, limiting their utility among these populations. Towards addressing this deficiency, we expand PRS development for CRC by incorporating Asian ancestry data (21,731 cases; 47,444 controls) into European ancestry training datasets (78,473 cases; 107,143 controls). The AUC estimates (95% CI) of PRS are 0.63(0.62-0.64), 0.59(0.57-0.61), 0.62(0.60-0.63), and 0.65(0.63-0.66) in independent datasets including 1681-3651 cases and 8696-115,105 controls of Asian, Black/African American, Latinx/Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White, respectively. They are significantly better than the European-centric PRS in all four major US racial and ethnic groups (p-values < 0.05). Further inclusion of non-European ancestry populations, especially Black/African American and Latinx/Hispanic, is needed to improve the risk prediction and enhance equity in applying PRS in clinical practice.
Biostatistics Division Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute Seattle USA
Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT Cambridge MA USA
Cancer Epidemiology Division Cancer Council Victoria Melbourne VIC Australia
Cancer Epidemiology Program H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa FL USA
Center for Cancer Research Medical University Vienna Vienna Austria
Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease University of North Carolina Chapel Hill NC USA
Center for Public Health Genomics University of Virginia Charlottesville VA USA
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública Madrid Spain
Department of Biostatistics School of Public Health Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
Department of Biostatistics University of Washington Seattle WA USA
Department of Clinical Genetics Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
Department of Clinical Sciences Faculty of Medicine University of Barcelona Barcelona 08908 Spain
Department of Clinical Sciences Faculty of Medicine University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center Haifa Israel
Department of Environmental Health Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health Boston MA USA
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx NY USA
Department of Epidemiology Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health Harvard University Boston MA USA
Department of Epidemiology Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA
Department of Epidemiology University of Washington School of Public Health Seattle WA USA
Department of Epidemiology University of Washington Seattle WA USA
Department of Family Medicine University of Virginia Charlottesville VA USA
Department of Gastroenterology Kaiser Permanente Medical Center San Francisco CA USA
Department of Gastroenterology Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center San Francisco CA USA
Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology Mayo Clinic Arizona Scottsdale AZ USA
Department of Medicine 1 University Hospital Dresden Technische Universität Dresden Dresden Germany
Department of Medicine and Epidemiology University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh PA USA
Department of Medicine and Surgery LUM University Camassima Italy
Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
Department of Medicine University of Washington Medical Center Seattle WA 98195 USA
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Department of Pathology University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI 48104 USA
Department of Population Science American Cancer Society Atlanta GA USA
Department of Preventive Medicine Chonnam National University Medical School Gwangju Korea
Department of Public Health and Primary Care University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
Department of Public Health Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
Department of Radiation Sciences Oncology Unit Umeå University Umeå Sweden
Departments of Epidemiology and Nutrition Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health Boston MA USA
Digestive Diseases and Microbiota Group Girona Biomedical Research Institute Salt 17190 Girona Spain
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute Nagoya Japan
Division of Cancer Epidemiology German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Germany
Division of Gastroenterology Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA
Division of Genetics and Epidemiology The Institute of Cancer Reseach London SW7 3RP UK
Division of Human Nutrition and Health Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The Netherlands
Division of Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute Nagoya Japan
Division of Preventive Oncology German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Germany
Division of Research Kaiser Permanente Northern California Oakland CA USA
Duke Molecular Physiology Institute Duke University Medical Center Durham NC USA
Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Center in Pilsen Charles University Pilsen Czech Republic
Gastrointestinal Genetics Lab CIC bioGUNE BRTA Derio Spain
Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic The Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville VIC 3000 Australia
Genomic Medicine Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
Institute for Health Promotion Graduate School of Public Health Yonsei University Seoul Korea
Institute for Health Research Kaiser Permanente Colorado Denver CO USA
Institute of Environmental Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Santiago Choupana sn 15706 Santiago de Compostela Spain
Jeonnam Regional Cancer Center Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital Hwasun Korea
Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology University of Leeds Leeds UK
Memorial University of Newfoundland Discipline of Genetics St John's Canada
Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa FL USA
Nantes Université CHU Nantes Service de Génétique Médicale F 44000 Nantes France
National University Cancer Institute Singapore Singapore
ONCOBEL Program Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona Spain
Population and Cancer Prevention Program Case Comprehensive Cancer Center Cleveland USA
Public Health Sciences Division Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Seattle WA 98109 USA
Research Institute and Hospital National Cancer Center Goyang South Korea South Korea
Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine Technion Israel Institute of Technology Haifa Israel
Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute CEDARS SINAI Los Angeles CA USA
Slone Epidemiology Center School of Medicine Boston University Boston MA USA
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Cancer Center Sun Yat sen University Guangzhou China
SWOG Statistical Center Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle WA USA
University Medical Centre Hamburg Eppendorf University Cancer Centre Hamburg Hamburg Germany
University of Hawaii Cancer Center Honolulu HI USA
University of Southern California Preventative Medicine Los Angeles CA USA
Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN USA
Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine Umeå University Umeå Sweden
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Murphy CC, et al. Decrease in incidence of colorectal cancer among individuals 50 years or older after recommendations for population-based screening. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017;15:903–909.e6. PubMed PMC
Hikino K, et al. Genome-wide association study of colorectal polyps identified highly overlapping polygenic architecture with colorectal cancer. J. Hum. Genet. 2022;67:149–156. PubMed
Thomas M, et al. Genome-wide modeling of polygenic risk score in colorectal cancer risk. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2020;107:432–444. PubMed PMC
Peterson RE, et al. Genome-wide association studies in ancestrally diverse populations: opportunities, methods, pitfalls, and recommendations. Cell. 2019;179:589–603. PubMed PMC
Vassos E, et al. An examination of polygenic score risk prediction in individuals with first-episode psychosis. Biol. Psychiatry. 2017;81:470–477. PubMed
Duncan L, et al. Analysis of polygenic risk score usage and performance in diverse human populations. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3328. PubMed PMC
Martin AR, et al. Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nat. Genet. 2019;51:584–591. PubMed PMC
Wojcik GL, et al. Genetic analyses of diverse populations improves discovery for complex traits. Nature. 2019;570:514–518. PubMed PMC
Ping J, et al. Developing and validating polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer risk prediction in East Asians. Int. J. Cancer. 2022;151:1726–1736. PubMed PMC
Ge T, et al. Development and validation of a trans-ancestry polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes in diverse populations. Genome Med. 2022;14:70. PubMed PMC
Song S, Jiang W, Hou L, Zhao H. Leveraging effect size distributions to improve polygenic risk scores derived from summary statistics of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2020;16:e1007565. PubMed PMC
Grinde KE, et al. Generalizing polygenic risk scores from Europeans to Hispanics/Latinos. Genet. Epidemiol. 2019;43:50–62. PubMed PMC
Márquez-Luna C, Loh P-R. South Asian Type 2 Diabetes (SAT2D) Consortium, SIGMA Type 2 Diabetes Consortium & Price, A. L. Multiethnic polygenic risk scores improve risk prediction in diverse populations. Genet. Epidemiol. 2017;41:811–823. PubMed PMC
Chen F, et al. Validation of a multi-ancestry polygenic risk score and age-specific risks of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis within diverse populations. eLife. 2022;11:e78304. PubMed PMC
Ruan Y, et al. Improving polygenic prediction in ancestrally diverse populations. Nat. Genet. 2022;54:573–580. PubMed PMC
Privé F, Arbel J, Vilhjálmsson BJ. LDpred2: better, faster, stronger. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:5424–5431. PubMed PMC
Huyghe JR, et al. Discovery of common and rare genetic risk variants for colorectal cancer. Nat. Genet. 2019;51:76–87. PubMed PMC
Lu Y, et al. Large-scale genome-wide association study of east asians identifies loci associated with risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:1455–1466. PubMed PMC
Law PJ, et al. Association analyses identify 31 new risk loci for colorectal cancer susceptibility. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2154. PubMed PMC
Fernandez-Rozadilla C, et al. Deciphering colorectal cancer genetics through multi-omic analysis of 100,204 cases and 154,587 controls of European and east Asian ancestries. Nat. Genet. 2023;55:89–99. PubMed PMC
Kerr KF, Brown MD, Zhu K, Janes H. Assessing the clinical impact of risk prediction models with decision curves: guidance for correct interpretation and appropriate use. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:2534–2540. PubMed PMC
Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med. Decis. Mak. 2006;26:565–574. PubMed PMC
Polygenic Risk Score Task Force of the International Common Disease Alliance. Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps. Nat. Med. 27, 1876–1884 (2021). PubMed
Lambert SA, Abraham G, Inouye M. Towards clinical utility of polygenic risk scores. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019;28:R133–R142. PubMed
Den RB, et al. Genomic classifier identifies men with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy who benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33:944–951. PubMed PMC
Choi E, et al. Development and validation of a risk prediction model for second primary lung cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114:87–96. PubMed PMC
US Preventive Services Task Force et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA325, 1965–1977 (2021). PubMed
Campos FG. Colorectal cancer in young adults: a difficult challenge. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017;23:5041–5044. PubMed PMC
Weinberg BA, Marshall JL. Colon cancer in young adults: trends and their implications. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2019;21:3. PubMed
Hull MA, Rees CJ, Sharp L, Koo S. A risk-stratified approach to colorectal cancer prevention and diagnosis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;17:773–780. PubMed PMC
Loeve F, Boer R, van Oortmarssen GJ, van Ballegooijen M, Habbema JD. The MISCAN-COLON simulation model for the evaluation of colorectal cancer screening. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1999;32:13–33. PubMed
Carver T, et al. CanRisk Tool-A Web Interface for the Prediction of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk and the Likelihood of Carrying Genetic Pathogenic Variants. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2021;30:469–473. PubMed PMC
Esserman, L. J. & WISDOM Study and Athena Investigators. The WISDOM Study: breaking the deadlock in the breast cancer screening debate. NPJ Breast Cancer3, 34 (2017). PubMed PMC
Hao L, et al. Development of a clinical polygenic risk score assay and reporting workflow. Nat. Med. 2022;28:1006–1013. PubMed PMC
Harnessing the True Power of the Genome - MyOme. https://www.myome.com/?utm_source=PRNewsWire&utm_medium=press_release&utm_campaign=ASHG_2022&utm_content=top.
Jeon J, et al. Determining risk of colorectal cancer and starting age of screening based on lifestyle, environmental, and genetic factors. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:2152–2164.e19. PubMed PMC
Lu Y, et al. Identification of novel loci and new risk variant in known loci for colorectal cancer risk in east asians. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2020;29:477–486. PubMed PMC
Schmit SL, et al. Novel common genetic susceptibility loci for colorectal cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111:146–157. PubMed PMC
Wang H, et al. Trans-ethnic genome-wide association study of colorectal cancer identifies a new susceptibility locus in VTI1A. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:4613. PubMed PMC
Wang H, et al. Fine-mapping of genome-wide association study-identified risk loci for colorectal cancer in African Americans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013;22:5048–5055. PubMed PMC
Schmit SL, et al. Genome-wide association study of colorectal cancer in Hispanics. Carcinogenesis. 2016;37:547–556. PubMed PMC
Calle EE, et al. The American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort: rationale, study design, and baseline characteristics. Cancer. 2002;94:500–511. PubMed
Hartung, J., Knapp, G. & Sinha, B. K. Statistical Meta-Analysis with Applications (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2008).
Heagerty PJ, Lumley T, Pepe MS. Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. Biometrics. 2000;56:337–344. PubMed
Le Borgne F, et al. Standardized and weighted time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves to evaluate the intrinsic prognostic capacities of a marker by taking into account confounding factors. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 2018;27:3397–3410. PubMed
Khera AV, et al. Whole-genome sequencing to characterize monogenic and polygenic contributions in patients hospitalized with early-onset myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2019;139:1593–1602. PubMed PMC
Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Elkin EB, Gonen M. Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2008;8:53. PubMed PMC
Zhang Z. Survival analysis in the presence of competing risks. Ann. Transl. Med. 2017;5:47. PubMed PMC
Privé F, Aschard H, Ziyatdinov A, Blum MGB. Efficient analysis of large-scale genome-wide data with two R packages: bigstatsr and bigsnpr. Bioinformatics. 2017;34:2781–2787. PubMed PMC
Gerds, T. A. & Kattan, M. W. Medical Risk Prediction: with Ties to Machine Learning (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2021).
Team, R. C. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2013).