Cryopreserved amniotic membrane in chronic nonhealing wounds: a series of case reports
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Case Reports, Journal Article
Grant support
NV18-08-00106
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
PubMed
37945942
PubMed Central
PMC10901998
DOI
10.1007/s10561-023-10100-5
PII: 10.1007/s10561-023-10100-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Chronic nonhealing wound, Chronic venous insufficiency, Cryopreserved amniotic membrane, Peripheral artery disease, Wound healing,
- MeSH
- Amnion * MeSH
- Wound Healing * MeSH
- Cryopreservation methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Case Reports MeSH
A case series of the use of amniotic membrane (AM) for treating chronic nonhealing wounds. It presents five cases of polymorbid patients with a total of nine chronic nonhealing wounds. The patient group consisted of four men and one woman with various comorbidities, aged 45-72 years. The mean initial wound size was 15.8 cm2, and the mean time from the onset of the wound to the first application of AM was 122 weeks. The wounds were caused by chronic venous insufficiency and/or peripheral arterial disease. Wounds were treated in a standardized protocol. AM was applied weekly in the first month and then every two weeks. Photo documentation of the wound and microbiological colonization was carried out at each visit. In three out of five patients, the AM treatment effectively promoted healing up to complete wound closure. In two cases, the wounds stayed unhealed despite numerous AM applications. Pain relief was noted in all patients. The success of the treatment was closely tied to patient factors, such as adherence to the prescribed treatment regimen and individual patient characteristics. In some cases, treatment failure was observed, possibly due to underlying comorbidities, wound parameters, or poor patient compliance. AM treatment has the potential to become a viable treatment option for these nonhealing wounds. However, the effectiveness of the treatment may be influenced by various patient factors and the underlying cause of the wound. Therefore, it is crucial to have an individualized treatment plan that considers these particular factors.
Department of Transplantation and Tissue Bank Motol University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Vascular Surgery Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Ahmajarvi KM, Isoherranen KM, Makela A, Venermo M. A change in the prevalence and the etiological factors of chronic wounds in Helsinki metropolitan area during 2008–2016. Int Wound J. 2019;16:522–526. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13077. PubMed DOI PMC
Al-Gharibi KA, Sharstha S, Al-Faras MA. Cost-effectiveness of wound care: a concept analysis. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2018;18:e433–e439. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2018.18.04.002. PubMed DOI PMC
Dadkhah Tehrani F, Firouzeh A, Shabani I, Shabani A. A review on modifications of amniotic membrane for biomedical applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:606982. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.606982. PubMed DOI PMC
Eriksson E, Liu PY, Schultz GS, Martins-Green MM, Tanaka R, Weir D, et al. Chronic wounds: treatment consensus. Wound Repair Regen. 2022;30:156–171. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12994. PubMed DOI PMC
Frykberg RG, Banks J. Challenges in the treatment of chronic wounds. Adv Wound Care (new Rochelle) 2015;4:560–582. doi: 10.1089/wound.2015.0635. PubMed DOI PMC
Gibbons GW. Grafix®, a cryopreserved placental membrane, for the treatment of chronic/stalled wounds. Adv Wound Care (new Rochelle) 2015;4:534–544. doi: 10.1089/wound.2015.0647. PubMed DOI PMC
Jarbrink K, Ni G, Sonnergren H, Schmidtchen A, Pang C, Bajpai R, et al. Prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds and related complications: a protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2016;5:152. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0329-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Jirsova K, Jones GLA. Amniotic membrane in ophthalmology: properties, preparation, storage and indications for grafting-a review. Cell Tissue Bank. 2017;18:193–204. doi: 10.1007/s10561-017-9618-5. PubMed DOI
King AE, Paltoo A, Kelly RW, Sallenave JM, Bocking AD, Challis JR. Expression of natural antimicrobials by human placenta and fetal membranes. Placenta. 2007;28:161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2006.01.006. PubMed DOI
Krupová L, Pokorná A. Quality of life in patients with non-healing wounds, with particular focus on assesment tools—a literature review. Cent Eur J Nurs Midwifery. 2020;11:94–103. doi: 10.15452/cejnm.2020.11.0010. DOI
Lavery LA, Fulmer J, Shebetka KA, Regulski M, Vayser D, Fried D, et al. The efficacy and safety of Grafix((R)) for the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a multi-centre, controlled, randomised, blinded, clinical trial. Int Wound J. 2014;11:554–560. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12329. PubMed DOI PMC
Mao Y, Jacob V, Singal A, Lei S, Park MS, Lima MRN, et al. Exosomes secreted from amniotic membrane contribute to its anti-fibrotic activity. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 doi: 10.3390/ijms22042055. PubMed DOI PMC
Martin P, Nunan R. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of repair in acute and chronic wound healing. Br J Dermatol. 2015;173:370–378. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13954. PubMed DOI PMC
Navas A, Magana-Guerrero FS, Dominguez-Lopez A, Chavez-Garcia C, Partido G, Graue-Hernandez EO, et al. Anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects of human amniotic membrane mesenchymal stem cells and their potential in corneal repair. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018;7:906–917. doi: 10.1002/sctm.18-0042. PubMed DOI PMC
Nussbaum SR, Carter MJ, Fife CE, DaVanzo J, Haught R, Nusgart M, et al. An economic evaluation of the impact, cost, and medicare policy implications of chronic nonhealing wounds. Value Health. 2018;21:27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.007. PubMed DOI
Odet S, Louvrier A, Meyer C, Nicolas FJ, Hofman N, Chatelain B, et al. Surgical application of human amniotic membrane and amnion-chorion membrane in the oral cavity and efficacy evaluation: corollary with ophthalmological and wound healing experiences. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:685128. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.685128. PubMed DOI PMC
Odet S, Meyer C, Gaudet C, Weber E, Quenot J, Derruau S, et al. Tips and tricks and clinical outcome of cryopreserved human amniotic membrane application for the management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ): a pilot study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:936074. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.936074. PubMed DOI PMC
Olsson M, Jarbrink K, Divakar U, Bajpai R, Upton Z, Schmidtchen A, et al. The humanistic and economic burden of chronic wounds: a systematic review. Wound Repair Regen. 2019;27:114–125. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12683. PubMed DOI
Pesteil F, Oujaou-Faiz K, Drouet M, Roussane MC, Aboyans V, Cornu E, et al. Cryopreserved amniotic membranes use in resistant vascular ulcers. J Mal Vasc. 2007;32:201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jmv.2007.07.003. PubMed DOI
Raffetto JD, Ligi D, Maniscalco R, Khalil RA, Mannello F. Why venous leg ulcers have difficulty healing: overview on pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and treatment. J Clin Med. 2021 doi: 10.3390/jcm10010029. PubMed DOI PMC
Serena TE, Yaakov R, DiMarco D, Le L, Taffe E, Donaldson M, et al. Dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane treatment of venous leg ulcers: correlation between 4-week and 24-week outcomes. J Wound Care. 2015;24:530–534. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.11.530. PubMed DOI
Svobodova A, Horvath V, Smeringaiova I, Cabral JV, Zemlickova M, Fiala R, et al. The healing dynamics of non-healing wounds using cryo-preserved amniotic membrane. Int Wound J. 2022;19:1243–1252. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13719. PubMed DOI PMC
Svobodova A, Vrkoslav V, Smeringaiova I, Jirsova K. Distribution of an analgesic palmitoylethanolamide and other N-acylethanolamines in human placental membranes. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0279863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279863. PubMed DOI PMC
Svobodova A, Horvath V, Balogh L, Zemlickova M, Fiala R, Burkert J, et al. Outcome of application of cryopreserved amniotic membrane grafts in the treatment of chronic nonhealing wounds of different origins in polymorbid patients: a prospective multicenter study. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023;29:900. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10080900. PubMed DOI PMC
Tapking C, Boson AL, Rontoyanni VG, Hundeshagen G, Kowalewski KF, Popp D, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 30-day readmission rates following burns. Burns. 2020;46:1013–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.11.001. PubMed DOI
Zelen CM, Gould L, Serena TE, Carter MJ, Keller J, Li WW. A prospective, randomised, controlled, multi-centre comparative effectiveness study of healing using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft, bioengineered skin substitute or standard of care for treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers. Int Wound J. 2015;12:724–732. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12395. PubMed DOI PMC