Role of clinicopathological variables in predicting recurrence and survival outcomes after surgery for non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu metaanalýza, systematický přehled, časopisecké články
PubMed
38009868
DOI
10.1002/ijc.34793
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- RCC, clinicopathological, late recurrence, recurrence, survival,
- MeSH
- karcinom z renálních buněk * patologie MeSH
- ledviny patologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory ledvin * patologie MeSH
- nefrektomie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 2% of all diagnosed malignancies worldwide, with disease recurrence affecting 20% to 40% of patients. Existing prognostic recurrence models based on clinicopathological features continue to be a subject of controversy. In this meta-analysis, we summarized research findings that explored the correlation between clinicopathological characteristics and post-surgery survival outcomes in non-metastatic RCC patients. Our analysis incorporates 99 publications spanning 140 568 patients. The study's main findings indicate that the following clinicopathological characteristics were associated with unfavorable survival outcomes: T stage, tumor grade, tumor size, lymph node involvement, tumor necrosis, sarcomatoid features, positive surgical margins (PSM), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), early recurrence, constitutional symptoms, poor performance status (PS), low hemoglobin level, high body-mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension. All of which emerged as predictors for poor recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival. Clear cell (CC) subtype, urinary collecting system invasion (UCSI), capsular penetration, perinephric fat invasion, renal vein invasion (RVI) and increased C-reactive protein (CRP) were all associated with poor RFS. In contrast, age, sex, tumor laterality, nephrectomy type and approach had no impact on survival outcomes. As part of an additional analysis, we attempted to assess the association between these characteristics and late recurrences (relapses occurring more than 5 years after surgery). Nevertheless, we did not find any prediction capabilities for late disease recurrences among any of the features examined. Our findings highlight the prognostic significance of various clinicopathological characteristics potentially aiding in the identification of high-risk RCC patients and enhancing the development of more precise prediction models.
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Jagiellonian University hospital Krakow Poland
Department of Urology King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam Saudi Arabia
Department of Urology La Croix Du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France
Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
Department of Urology University of Verona Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona Italy
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York USA
Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Padala SA, Barsouk A, Thandra KC, et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. World J Oncol. 2020;11(3):79-87. doi:10.14740/wjon1279
Wong MCS, Goggins WB, Yip BHK, et al. Incidence and mortality of kidney cancer: temporal patterns and global trends in 39 countries. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):15698. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15922-4
Znaor A, Lortet-Tieulent J, Laversanne M, Jemal A, Bray F. International variations and trends in renal cell carcinoma incidence and mortality. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):519-530. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.002
Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC, et al. Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a stratification tool for prospective clinical trials. Cancer. 2003;97:1663-1671.
Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK. Five-year survival after surgical treatment for kidney cancer: a population-based competing risk analysis. Cancer. 2007;109:1763-1768.
Ljungberg B, Alamdari FI, Rasmuson T, Roos G. Follow-up guidelines for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma based on the occurrence of metastases after radical nephrectomy. BJU Int. 1999;84:405-411.
Breda A, Konijeti R, Lam JS. Patterns of recurrence and surveillance strategies for renal cell carcinoma following surgical resection. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007;7:847-862.
Kattan MW, Reuter V, Motzer RJ, Katz J, Russo P. A postoperative prognostic nomogram for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2001;166:63-67.
Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Dorey F, et al. Improved prognostication of renal cell carcinoma using an integrated staging system. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1649-1657. doi:10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1649
Parker WP, Cheville JC, Frank I, et al. Application of the stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contemporary patients. Eur Urol. 2017;71:665-673. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.034
Cindolo L, de la Taille A, Messina G, et al. A preoperative clinical prognostic model for non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2003;92:901-905. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04505.x
Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, Cheville JC, et al. Predicting oncologic outcomes in renal cell carcinoma after surgery. Eur Urol. 2018;73:772-780. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.005
Buti S, Puligandla M, Bersanelli M, et al. Validation of a new prognostic model to easily predict outcome in renal cell carcinoma: the GRANT score applied to the ASSURE trial population. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(11):2747-2753. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx492
Karakiewicz PI, Suardi N, Capitanio U, et al. A preoperative prognostic model for patients treated with nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2009;55:287-295. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.037
Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. J Urol. 2002;168:2395-2400.
Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777-784. doi:10.7326/M14-2385
Nakano E, Fujioka H, Matsuda M, Osafune M, Takaha M, Sonoda T. Late recurrence of renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 1984;10:347-349.
Brookman-May S, May M, Shariat SF, et al. Features associated with recurrence beyond 5 years after nephrectomy and nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: development and internal validation of a risk model (PRELANE score) to predict late recurrence based on a large multicenter database (CORONA/SATURN project). Eur Urol. 2013;64(3):472-477. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.030
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al., eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane; 2022.
Patel SH, Uzzo RG, Larcher A, et al. Oncologic and functional outcomes of radical and partial nephrectomy in pT3a pathologically upstaged renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020;18(6):e723-e729. doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2020.05.002
Park YH, Lee ES, Kim HH, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for clinically localized renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24(8):556-562. doi:10.1089/lap.2014.0035
Abu-Ghanem Y, Powles T, Capitanio U, et al. The impact of histological subtype on the incidence, timing, and patterns of recurrence in patients with renal cell carcinoma after surgery-results from RECUR consortium. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(3):473-482. doi:10.1016/j.euo.2020.09.005
Dagenais J, Mouracade P, Maurice M, et al. Frozen sections for margins during partial nephrectomy do not influence recurrence rates. J Endourol. 2018;32(8):759-764. doi:10.1089/end.2018.0314
Peng D, He ZS, Li XS, et al. Partial nephrectomy for T3aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma: shall we step forward? Int Braz J Urol. 2017;43(5):849-856. doi:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0598
Huang J, Feldman AS, Dong L, et al. Preoperative anemia as an independent prognostic indicator of papillary renal cell carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015;13(5):e353-e360. doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2015.04.014
Correa AF, Ruth KJ, Al-Saleem T, et al. Overall tumor genomic instability: an important predictor of recurrence-free survival in patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther. 2020;21(5):424-431. doi:10.1080/15384047.2020.1721251
Waalkes S, Merseburger AS, Herrmann TR, et al. Urinary collecting system invasion is no independent prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol. 2010;28(3):283-288. doi:10.1007/s00345-010-0526-6
Kang HW, Lee SK, Kim WT, et al. Surgical margin does not influence recurrence rate in Pt1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma after partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(1):70-74. doi:10.1002/jso.24259
Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, et al. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol. 2008;179:2158-2163. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.100
Kwon EO, Carver BS, Snyder ME, et al. Impact of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors. BJU Int. 2006;99:286-289. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06623.x
Bernhard J-C, Pantuck AJ, Wallerand H, et al. Predictive factors for ipsilateral recurrence after nephron-sparing surgery in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2010;57(6):1080-1086.
Ficarra V, Martignoni G, Galfano A, et al. Prognostic role of the histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma after slide revision. Eur Urol. 2006;50:786-794.
Patard JJ, Leray E, Rioux-Leclercq N, et al. Prognostic value of histologic subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter experience. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(12):2763-2771. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.07.055
Sánchez-Ortiz RF, Rosser CJ, Madsen LT, Swanson DA, Wood CG. Young age is an independent prognostic factor for survival of sporadic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2004;171:2160-2165.
Gillett MD, Cheville JC, Karnes RJ, et al. Comparison of presentation and outcome for patients 18 to 40 and 60 to 70 years old with solid renal masses. J Urol. 2005;173:1893-1896.
Beisland C, Medby PC, Beisland HO. Renal cell carcinoma: gender difference in incidental detection and cancer-specific survival. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2002;36(6):414-418. doi:10.1080/003655902762467558
Aron M, Nguyen MM, Stein RJ, Gill IS. Impact of gender in renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of the SEER database. Eur Urol. 2008;54(1):133-140. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.12.001
Woldrich JM, Mallin K, Ritchey J, Carroll PR, Kane CJ. Sex differences in renal cell cancer presentation and survival: an analysis of the National Cancer Database, 1993-2004. J Urol. 2008;179(5):1709-1713; discussion 1713. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.024
Obermair A, Handisurya A, Kaider A, Sevelda P, Kölbl H, Gitsch G. The relationship of pretreatment serum hemoglobin level to the survival of epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients: a prospective review. Cancer. 1998;83(4):726-731.
Kang HS, Shin AY, Yeo CD, et al. Clinical significance of anemia as a prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer carcinoma with activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12(5):1895-1902. doi:10.21037/jtd-19-3932
Magera JS Jr, Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, et al. Association of abnormal preoperative laboratory values with survival after radical nephrectomy for clinically confined clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2008;71(2):278-282. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.048
Hockel M, Vaupel P. Tumor hypoxia: definitions and current clinical, biologic, and molecular aspects. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:266-276.
Yoshida N, Ikemoto S, Narita K, et al. Interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interleukin-1beta in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2002;86:1396-1400.
Correa AF, Jegede O, Haas NB, et al. Predicting renal cancer recurrence: defining limitations of existing prognostic models with prospective trial-based validation. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(23):2062-2071. doi:10.1200/JCO.19.00107
Kim SP, Weight CJ, Leibovich BC, et al. Outcomes and clinicopathologic variables associated with late recurrence after nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2011;78(5):1101-1106. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2011.05.012
Miyao N, Naito S, Ozono S, et al. Late recurrence of renal cell carcinoma: retrospective and collaborative study of the Japanese Society of Renal Cancer. Urology. 2011;77(2):379-384. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.462