Severity-adjusted evaluation of liver transplantation on health outcomes in urea cycle disorders
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
U54 HD061221
NICHD NIH HHS - United States
U54 HD090257
NICHD NIH HHS - United States
P50 HD103555
NICHD NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
38054409
DOI
10.1016/j.gim.2023.101039
PII: S1098-3600(23)01055-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Argininosuccinic aciduria, Citrullinemia type 1, Liver transplantation, Ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency, Urea cycle disorders,
- MeSH
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Proteins MeSH
- Liver Transplantation * MeSH
- Urea Cycle Disorders, Inborn * genetics surgery MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Proteins MeSH
PURPOSE: Liver transplantation (LTx) is performed in individuals with urea cycle disorders when medical management (MM) insufficiently prevents the occurrence of hyperammonemic events. However, there is a paucity of systematic analyses on the effects of LTx on health-related outcome parameters compared to individuals with comparable severity who are medically managed. METHODS: We investigated the effects of LTx and MM on validated health-related outcome parameters, including the metabolic disease course, linear growth, and neurocognitive outcomes. Individuals were stratified into "severe" and "attenuated" categories based on the genotype-specific and validated in vitro enzyme activity. RESULTS: LTx enabled metabolic stability by prevention of further hyperammonemic events after transplantation and was associated with a more favorable growth outcome compared with individuals remaining under MM. However, neurocognitive outcome in individuals with LTx did not differ from the medically managed counterparts as reflected by the frequency of motor abnormality and cognitive standard deviation score at last observation. CONCLUSION: Whereas LTx enabled metabolic stability without further need of protein restriction or nitrogen-scavenging therapy and was associated with a more favorable growth outcome, LTx-as currently performed-was not associated with improved neurocognitive outcomes compared with long-term MM in the investigated urea cycle disorders.
References provided by Crossref.org