Minimal Residual Disease Status Predicts Outcome in Patients With Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma: A Prospective Analysis of the Phase III GALLIUM Study
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
38096461
DOI
10.1200/jco.23.00838
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Bendamustine Hydrochloride MeSH
- Cyclophosphamide MeSH
- Doxorubicin MeSH
- Lymphoma, Follicular * MeSH
- Gallium * therapeutic use MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Prednisone MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects MeSH
- Neoplasm, Residual drug therapy MeSH
- Rituximab MeSH
- Vincristine MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Bendamustine Hydrochloride MeSH
- Cyclophosphamide MeSH
- Doxorubicin MeSH
- Gallium * MeSH
- Prednisone MeSH
- Rituximab MeSH
- Vincristine MeSH
PURPOSE: We report an analysis of minimal residual/detectable disease (MRD) as a predictor of outcome in previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) from the randomized, multicenter GALLIUM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01332968) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received induction with obinutuzumab (G) or rituximab (R) plus bendamustine, or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) or cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (CVP) chemotherapy, followed by maintenance with the same antibody in responders. MRD status was assessed at predefined time points (mid-induction [MI], end of induction [EOI], and at 4-6 monthly intervals during maintenance and follow-up). Patients with evaluable biomarker data at diagnosis were included in the survival analysis. RESULTS: MRD positivity was associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) at MI (hazard ratio [HR], 3.03 [95% CI, 2.07 to 4.45]; P < .0001) and EOI (HR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.53 to 3.32]; P < .0001). MRD response was higher after G- versus R-chemotherapy at MI (94.2% v 88.9%; P = .013) and at EOI (93.1% v 86.7%; P = .0077). Late responders (MI-positive/EOI-negative) had a significantly poorer PFS than early responders (MI-negative/EOI-negative; HR, 3.11 [95% CI, 1.75 to 5.52]; P = .00011). The smallest proportion of MRD positivity was observed in patients receiving bendamustine at MI (4.8% v 16.0% in those receiving CHOP; P < .0001). G appeared to compensate for less effective chemotherapy regimens, with similar MRD response rates observed across the G-chemo groups. During the maintenance period, more patients treated with R than with G were MRD-positive (R-CHOP, 20.7% v G-CHOP, 7.0%; R-CVP, 21.7% v G-CVP, 9.4%). Throughout maintenance, MRD positivity was associated with clinical relapse. CONCLUSION: MRD status can determine outcome after induction and during maintenance, and MRD negativity is a prerequisite for long-term disease control in FL. The higher MRD responses after G- versus R-based treatment confirm more effective tumor cell clearance.
Concord Repatriation General Hospital University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia
East Kent Hospital Canterbury United Kingdom
F Hoffmann La Roche Ltd Basel Switzerland
HELIOS Klinikum Erfurt Germany
Kings College Hospital London United Kingdom
Roche Products Ltd Welwyn Garden City United Kingdom
University Hospital and Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
University Hospital Schleswig Holstein Kiel Germany
References provided by Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01332968