PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that levels for 50% speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise differ for different languages. Here, we aimed to find out whether these differences may relate to different auditory processing of temporal sound features in different languages, and to determine the influence of tinnitus on speech comprehension in different languages. METHODS: We measured speech intelligibility under various conditions (words in quiet, sentences in babble noise, interrupted sentences) along with tone detection thresholds in quiet [PTA] and in noise [PTAnoise], gap detection thresholds [GDT], and detection thresholds for frequency modulation [FMT], and compared them between Czech and Swiss subjects matched in mean age and PTA. RESULTS: The Swiss subjects exhibited higher speech reception thresholds in quiet, higher threshold speech-to-noise ratio, and shallower slope of performance-intensity function for the words in quiet. Importantly, the intelligibility of temporally gated speech was similar in the Czech and Swiss subjects. The PTAnoise, GDT, and FMT were similar in the two groups. The Czech subjects exhibited correlations of the speech tests with GDT and FMT, which was not the case in the Swiss group. Qualitatively, the results of comparisons between the Swiss and Czech populations were not influenced by presence of subjective tinnitus. CONCLUSION: The results support the notion of language-specific differences in speech comprehension which persists also in tinnitus subjects, and indicates different associations with the elementary measures of auditory temporal processing.

Center for the Interdisciplinary Study of Language Evolution University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Department of Auditory Neuroscience Institute of Experimental Medicine Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic

Department of Cognitive Systems and Neurosciences Czech Institute of Informatics Robotics and Cybernetics Czech Technical University Prague Jugoslávských partyzánů 1580 3 160 00 Prague 6 Czech Republic

Department of Otorhinolaryngology 3rd Faculty of Medicine University Hospital Královské Vinohrady Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Evolutionary Neuroscience of Language Department of Comparative Language Science University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Institute of Phonetics Faculty of Arts Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Soli SD, Wong LLN (2008) Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol 47:356–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020801895136 PubMed DOI

Kollmeier B (2015) Overcoming language barriers: matrix sentence tests with closed speech corpora. Int J Audiol 54(Suppl 2):1–2. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1074295 PubMed DOI

Joiko J, Bohnert A, Strieth S et al (2021) The German hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol 60:927–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2020.1837969 PubMed DOI

Profant O, Jilek M, Bures Z et al (2019) Functional age-related changes within the human auditory system studied by audiometric examination. Front Aging Neurosci 11:26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00026 PubMed DOI PMC

Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB (1996) Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:143–148. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140029007 PubMed DOI

Newman CW, Sandridge SA, Jacobson GP (1998) Psychometric adequacy of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) for evaluating treatment outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 9:153–160 PubMed

Bureš Z, Profant O, Svobodová V et al (2019) Speech comprehension and its relation to other auditory parameters in elderly patients with Tinnitus. Front Aging Neurosci 11:219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00219 PubMed DOI PMC

Seeman M (1960) Česká slovní audiometrie. Státní zdravotnické nakladatelství, Praha

Dlouhá O, Vokřál J, Černý L (2012) Test of sentence intelligibility in babble noise in persons with hearing disorder. Otorinolaryngol Foniatr 61:240–244

Kurthen I, Christen A, Meyer M, Giroud N (2022) Older adults’ neural tracking of interrupted speech is a function of task difficulty. Neuroimage 262:119580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119580 PubMed DOI

Jilek M, Šuta D, Syka J (2014) Reference hearing thresholds in an extended frequency range as a function of age. J Acoust Soc Am 136:1821–1830. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4894719 PubMed DOI

Mazelová J, Popelar J, Syka J (2003) Auditory function in presbycusis: peripheral vs. central changes. Exp Gerontol 38:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0531-5565(02)00155-9 PubMed DOI

Kompis M, Krebs M, Häusler R (2006) Verification of normative values for the Swiss version of the Freiburg speech intelligibility test. HNO 54:445–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-005-1337-8 PubMed DOI

Johnson EM, Morgan SD, Ferguson SH (2020) Does time compression decrease intelligibility for female talkers more than for male talkers? J Speech Lang Hear Res JSLHR 63:1083–1092. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00301 PubMed DOI

Mönnich A-L, Strieth S, Bohnert A et al (2023) The German hearing in noise test with a female talker: development and comparison with German male speech test. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07820-5 DOI