Facial Nerve Schwannoma Treatment with Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) versus Resection followed by SRS: Outcomes and a Management Protocol
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
38274481
PubMed Central
PMC10807954
DOI
10.1055/a-1990-2861
PII: JNLS-B-22-Aug-0376
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- facial nerve, internal auditory canal, schwannoma, stereotactic radiosurgery,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and resection are treatment options for patients with facial nerve schwannomas without mass effect. Objective This article evaluates outcomes of patients treated with SRS versus resection + SRS. Method We retrospectively compared 43 patients treated with SRS to 12 patients treated with resection + SRS. The primary study outcome was unfavorable combined endpoint, defined as worsening or new clinical symptoms, and/or tumor radiological progression. SRS (38.81 ± 5.3) and resection + SRS (67.14 ± 11.8) groups had similar clinical follow-ups. Results At the time of SRS, the tumor volumes of SRS (mean ± standard error; 1.83 ± 0.35 mL) and resection + SRS (2.51 ± 0.75 mL) groups were similar. SRS (12.15 ± 0.08 Gy) and resection + SRS (12.16 ± 0.14 Gy) groups received similar radiation doses. SRS group (42/43, 98%) had better local tumor control than the resection + SRS group (10/12, 83%, p = 0.04). Most of SRS (32/43, 74%) and resection + SRS (10/12, 83%) group patients reached a favorable combined endpoint following SRS ( p = 0.52). Considering surgical associated side effects, only 2/10 patients of the resection + SRS group reached a favorable endpoint ( p < 0.001). Patients of SRS group, who are > 34 years old ( p = 0.02), have larger tumors (> 4 mL, 0.04), internal auditory canal (IAC) segment tumor involvement ( p = 0.01) were more likely to reach an unfavorable endpoint. Resection + SRS group patients did not show such a difference. Conclusion While resection is still needed for larger tumors, SRS offers better clinical and radiological outcomes compared to resection followed by SRS for facial schwannomas. Younger age, smaller tumors, and non-IAC situated tumors are factors that portend a favorable outcome.
Department of Neuro Oncology Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio United States
Department of Neurological Surgery Charlottesville Virginia United States
Department of Neurological Surgery House Ear Institute Los Angeles California United States
Department of Neurosurgery Ain Shams University Cairo Egypt
Department of Neurosurgery House Clinic Los Angeles California United States
Department of Neurosurgery National Yang Ming University Hsinchu Taiwan
Department of Neurosurgery New York University Medical Center New York New York United States
Department of Neurosurgery Taipei Veteran General Hospital Taipei Taiwan
Department of Neurosurgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania United States
Department of Neurosurgery University of Sherbrooke Sherbrooke Quebec Canada
Department of Neurosurgery University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia United States
Department of Radiation Oncology Mayo Clinic Jacksonville Florida United States
Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Gamma Knife Center Cairo Nasser Institute Hospital Cairo Egypt
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Mehta G U, Lekovic G P, Slattery W H et al.Effect of anatomic segment involvement on stereotactic radiosurgery for facial nerve schwannomas: an international multicenter cohort study. Neurosurgery. 2020;88(01):E91–E98. PubMed
Rhoton A L, Jr, Kobayashi S, Hollinshead W H. Nervus intermedius. J Neurosurg. 1968;29(06):609–618. PubMed
Pathapati D, Barla K, Dayal M, Gati R, Lakota P K. Facial nerve schwannoma: the rare/great mimicker of vestibular schwannoma/neuroma. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2021;31(02):510–513. PubMed PMC
Thai N LB, Mai N Y, Vuong N L et al.Treatment for vestibular schwannoma: Systematic review and single arm meta-analysis. Am J Otolaryngol. 2022;43(02):103337. PubMed
Eshraghi A A, Oker N, Ocak E et al.Management of facial nerve schwannoma: a multicenter study of 50 cases. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019;80(04):352–356. PubMed PMC
Tonetti D, Bhatnagar J, Lunsford L D.Quantitative analysis of movement of a cervical target during stereotactic radiosurgery using the Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion J Neurosurg 2012117(Suppl):211–216. PubMed
Cox J D, Stetz J, Pajak T F. Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31(05):1341–1346. PubMed
Quesnel A M, Santos F. Evaluation and management of facial nerve schwannoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2018;51(06):1179–1192. PubMed
Murai T, Kamata S E, Sato K et al.Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for auditory canal or middle ear cancer. Cancer Contr. 2016;23(03):311–316. PubMed