Facial Nerve Schwannoma Treatment with Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) versus Resection followed by SRS: Outcomes and a Management Protocol

. 2024 Feb ; 85 (1) : 75-80. [epub] 20221230

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid38274481
Odkazy

PubMed 38274481
PubMed Central PMC10807954
DOI 10.1055/a-1990-2861
PII: JNLS-B-22-Aug-0376
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and resection are treatment options for patients with facial nerve schwannomas without mass effect. Objective This article evaluates outcomes of patients treated with SRS versus resection + SRS. Method We retrospectively compared 43 patients treated with SRS to 12 patients treated with resection + SRS. The primary study outcome was unfavorable combined endpoint, defined as worsening or new clinical symptoms, and/or tumor radiological progression. SRS (38.81 ± 5.3) and resection + SRS (67.14 ± 11.8) groups had similar clinical follow-ups. Results At the time of SRS, the tumor volumes of SRS (mean ± standard error; 1.83 ± 0.35 mL) and resection + SRS (2.51 ± 0.75 mL) groups were similar. SRS (12.15 ± 0.08 Gy) and resection + SRS (12.16 ± 0.14 Gy) groups received similar radiation doses. SRS group (42/43, 98%) had better local tumor control than the resection + SRS group (10/12, 83%, p = 0.04). Most of SRS (32/43, 74%) and resection + SRS (10/12, 83%) group patients reached a favorable combined endpoint following SRS ( p = 0.52). Considering surgical associated side effects, only 2/10 patients of the resection + SRS group reached a favorable endpoint ( p < 0.001). Patients of SRS group, who are > 34 years old ( p = 0.02), have larger tumors (> 4 mL, 0.04), internal auditory canal (IAC) segment tumor involvement ( p = 0.01) were more likely to reach an unfavorable endpoint. Resection + SRS group patients did not show such a difference. Conclusion While resection is still needed for larger tumors, SRS offers better clinical and radiological outcomes compared to resection followed by SRS for facial schwannomas. Younger age, smaller tumors, and non-IAC situated tumors are factors that portend a favorable outcome.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Mehta G U, Lekovic G P, Slattery W H et al.Effect of anatomic segment involvement on stereotactic radiosurgery for facial nerve schwannomas: an international multicenter cohort study. Neurosurgery. 2020;88(01):E91–E98. PubMed

Rhoton A L, Jr, Kobayashi S, Hollinshead W H. Nervus intermedius. J Neurosurg. 1968;29(06):609–618. PubMed

Pathapati D, Barla K, Dayal M, Gati R, Lakota P K. Facial nerve schwannoma: the rare/great mimicker of vestibular schwannoma/neuroma. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2021;31(02):510–513. PubMed PMC

Thai N LB, Mai N Y, Vuong N L et al.Treatment for vestibular schwannoma: Systematic review and single arm meta-analysis. Am J Otolaryngol. 2022;43(02):103337. PubMed

Eshraghi A A, Oker N, Ocak E et al.Management of facial nerve schwannoma: a multicenter study of 50 cases. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019;80(04):352–356. PubMed PMC

Tonetti D, Bhatnagar J, Lunsford L D.Quantitative analysis of movement of a cervical target during stereotactic radiosurgery using the Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion J Neurosurg 2012117(Suppl):211–216. PubMed

Cox J D, Stetz J, Pajak T F. Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31(05):1341–1346. PubMed

Quesnel A M, Santos F. Evaluation and management of facial nerve schwannoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2018;51(06):1179–1192. PubMed

Murai T, Kamata S E, Sato K et al.Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for auditory canal or middle ear cancer. Cancer Contr. 2016;23(03):311–316. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace