BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Understanding biomass allocation among plant organs is crucial for comprehending plant growth optimization, survival and responses to the drivers of global change. Yet, the mechanisms governing mass allocation in vascular plants from extreme elevations exposed to cold and drought stresses remain poorly understood. METHODOLOGY: We analysed organ mass weights and fractions in 258 Himalayan herbaceous species across diverse habitats (wetland, steppe, alpine), growth forms (annual, perennial taprooted, rhizomatous and cushiony) and climatic gradients (3500-6150 m elevation) to explore whether biomass distribution adhered to fixed allometric or optimal partitioning rules, and how variations in size, phylogeny and ecological preferences influence their strategies for resource allocation. KEY FINDINGS: Following optimal partitioning theory, Himalayan plants distribute more biomass to key organs vital for acquiring and preserving limited resources necessary for their growth and survival. Allocation strategies are mainly influenced by plant growth forms and habitat conditions, notably temperature, water availability and evaporative demands. Alpine plants invest primarily in below-ground stem bases for storage and regeneration, reducing above-ground stems while increasing leaf mass fraction to maximize carbon assimilation in their short growing season. Conversely, arid steppe plants prioritize deep roots over leaves to secure water and minimize transpiration. Wetland plants allocate resources to above-ground stems and below-ground rhizomes, enabling them to resist competition and grazing in fertile environments. CONCLUSIONS: Himalayan plants from extreme elevations optimize their allocation strategies to acquire scarce resources under specific conditions, efficiently investing carbon from supportive to acquisitive and protective functions with increasing cold and drought. Intraspecific variation and shared ancestry have not significantly altered biomass allocation strategies of Himalayan plants. Despite diverse evolutionary histories, plants from similar habitats have developed comparable phenotypic structures to adapt to their specific environments. This study offers new insights into plant adaptations in diverse Himalayan environments and underscores the importance of efficient resource allocation for survival and growth in challenging conditions.

Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia České Budějovice Czech Republic

Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Science Průhonice Czech Republic

Komentář v

Ann Bot. 2024 Aug 22;134(3):i-iii. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcae069. PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Abatzoglou J, Dobrowski S, Parks S, Hegewisch KC.. 2018. TerraClimate, high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Scientific Data 5: 191. PubMed PMC

Adler PB, Salguero-Gómez R, Compagnoni A, et al. . 2014. Functional traits explain variation in plant life history strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111: 740–745. PubMed PMC

Aerts R, Chapin FS.. 1999. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. In: Fitter AH, Raffaelli DG. eds. Advances in ecological research, Vol. 30. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 1–67.

Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y.. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 57: 289–300.

Bloom AJ, Chapin FS, Mooney HA.. 1985. Resource limitation in plants—an economic analogy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 363–392.

Blum A. 2005. Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 1159–1168.

Blume-Werry G, Lindén E, Andresen L, et al. . 2018. Proportion of fine roots, but not plant biomass allocation below ground, increases with elevation in arctic tundra. Journal of Vegetation Science 29: 226–235.

Chapin FS, Autumn K, Pugnaire F.. 1993. Evolution of suites of traits in response to environmental stress. The American Naturalist 142: S78–S92.

Chave J, Réjou-Méchain M, Búrquez A, et al. . 2014. Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Global Change Biology 20: 3177–3190. PubMed

Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS.. 2003. Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology 30: 239–264. PubMed

Chlumská Z, Liancourt P, Hartmann H, et al. . 2022. Species- and compound-specific dynamics of nonstructural carbohydrates toward the world’s upper distribution of vascular plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 201: 104985.

Chondol T, Klimeš A, Altman J, et al. . 2023. Habitat preferences and functional traits drive longevity in Himalayan high-mountain plants. Oikos 2023: e010073.

Desdevises Y, Legendre P, Azouzi L, Morand S.. 2003. Quantifying phylogenetically structured environmental variation. Evolution 57: 2647–2652. PubMed

Doležal J, Dvorský M, Kopecký M, et al. . 2016. Vegetation dynamics at the upper elevational limit of vascular plants in Himalaya. Scientific Reports 6: 24881. PubMed PMC

Doležal J, Dvorský M, Borner A, Wild J, Schweingruber FH.. 2018. Anatomy, age and ecology of high mountain plants in Ladakh, the Western Himalaya. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Doležal J, Kopecký M, Dvorský M, et al. . 2019. Sink limitation of plant growth determines tree line in the arid Himalayas. Functional Ecology 33: 553–565.

Doležal J, Jandová V, Macek M, Liancourt P.. 2021. Contrasting biomass allocation responses across ontogeny and stress gradients reveal plant adaptations to drought and cold. Functional Ecology 35: 32–42.

Dong N, Prentice IC, Harrison SP, Song QH, Zhang YP.. 2017. Biophysical homoeostasis of leaf temperature: a neglected process for vegetation and land-surface modelling. Global Ecology and Biogeography 26: 998–1007.

Dvorský M, Doležal J, de Bello F, Klimešová J, Klimeš L.. 2011. Vegetation types of East Ladakh: species and growth form composition along main environmental gradients. Applied Vegetation Science 14: 132–147.

Dvorský M, Altman J, Kopecký M, et al. . 2015. Vascular plants at extreme elevations in eastern Ladakh, Northwest Himalayas. Plant Ecology & Diversity 8: 571–584.

Dvorský M, Macek M, Kopecký M, Wild J, Doležal J.. 2017. Niche asymmetry of vascular plants increases with elevation. Journal of Biogeography 44: 1418–1425.

Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ.. 2002. Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science 295: 1517–1520. PubMed

Erice G, Louahlia S, Irigoyen JJ, Sanchez-Diaz M, Avice JC.. 2010. Biomass partitioning, morphology and water status of four alfalfa genotypes submitted to progressive drought and subsequent recovery. Journal of Plant Physiology 167: 114–120. PubMed

Eziz A, Yan Z, Tian D, Han W, Tang Z, Fang J.. 2017. Drought effect on plant biomass allocation: a meta-analysis. Ecology and Evolution 7: 11002–11010. PubMed PMC

Falster DS, Westoby M.. 2003. Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 337–343.

Fan L, Ding J, Ma X, Li Y.. 2019. Ecological biomass allocation strategies in plant species with different life forms in a cold desert, China. Journal of Arid Land 11: 729–739.

Freschet GT, Violle C, Bourget MY, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Fort F.. 2018. Allocation, morphology, physiology, architecture: the multiple facets of plant above- and below-ground responses to resource stress. The New Phytologist 219: 1338–1352. PubMed

Grime JP. 2001. Plant strategies, vegetation processes and ecosystem properties. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Hermans C, Hammond JP, White PJ, Verbruggen N.. 2006. How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation? Trends in Plant Science 11: 610–617. PubMed

Klimešová J, Doležal J, Dvorský M, de Bello F, Klimeš L.. 2011. Clonal growth forms in Eastern Ladakh, Western Himalayas: classification and habitat preferences. Folia Geobotanica 46: 191–217.

Körner C. 2021. Alpine plant life: functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Körner C, Rienhardt U.. 1987. Dry matter partitioning and root length/leaf area ratios in herbaceous perennial plants with diverse altitudinal distribution. Oecologia 74: 411–418. PubMed

Kvakić M, Tzagkarakis G, Pellerin S, et al. . 2020. Carbon and phosphorus allocation in annual plants: an optimal functioning approach. Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 149. PubMed PMC

Li C, Zheng Z, Peng Y, et al. . 2019. Precipitation and nitrogen addition enhance biomass allocation to aboveground in an alpine steppe. Ecology and Evolution 9: 12193–12201. PubMed PMC

Liancourt P, Song X, Macek M, Santrucek J, Dolezal J.. 2020. Plant’s-eye view of temperature governs elevational distributions. Global Change Biology 26: 4094–4103. PubMed

Liu R, Yang X, Gao R, et al. . 2021a. Allometry rather than abiotic drivers explains biomass allocation among leaves, stems and roots of Artemisia across a large environmental gradient in China. Journal of Ecology 109: 1026–1040.

Liu Y, Xu M, Li G, Wang M, Li Z, De Boeck HJ.. 2021b. Changes of aboveground and belowground biomass allocation in four dominant grassland species across a precipitation gradient. Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 650802. PubMed PMC

Liu R, Yang X, Gao R, Huang Z, Cornelissen JHC.. 2022. Coordination of economics spectra in leaf, stem and root within the genus Artemisia along a large environmental gradient in China. Global Ecology and Biogeography 32: 324–338.

Ma W, Shi P, Li W, et al. . 2010. Changes in individual plant traits and biomass allocation in alpine meadow with elevation variation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Science China Life Sciences 53: 1142–1151. PubMed

Ma X, Yan Y, Hong J, Lu X, Wang X.. 2017. Impacts of warming on root biomass allocation in alpine steppe on the North Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Mountain Science 14: 1615–1623.

Macek P, Klimeš L, Adamec L, et al. . 2012. Plant nutrient content does not simply increase with elevation under the extreme environmental conditions of Ladakh, NW Himalaya. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research 44: 62–66.

McCarthy MC, Enquist BJ.. 2007. Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation. Functional Ecology 21: 713–720.

Mensah S, Kakaï RG, Seifert T.. 2016. Patterns of biomass allocation between foliage and woody structure: the effects of tree size and specific functional traits. Annals of Forest Research 59: 1.

Moles AT, Warton DI, Warman L, et al. . 2009. Global patterns in plant height. Journal of Ecology 97: 923–932.

Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H.. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4: 133–142.

Patty L, Halloy SRP, Hiltbrunner E, Körner C.. 2010. Biomass allocation in herbaceous plants under grazing impact in the high semi-arid Andes. Flora 205: 695–703.

Peng Y, Fornara DA, Yue K, et al. . 2022. Globally limited individual and combined effects of multiple global change factors on allometric biomass partitioning. Global Ecology and Biogeography 31: 454–469.

Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team. 2023. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-148. New York: Springer.

Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L.. 2012. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta‐analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. The New Phytologist 193: 30–50. PubMed

Poorter H, Jagodzinski AM, Ruiz‐Peinado R, et al. . 2015. How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents. New Phytologist 208: 736–749. PubMed PMC

Portela R, Barreiro R, Roiloa SR.. 2019. Biomass partitioning in response to resources availability: a comparison between native and invaded ranges in the clonal invader Carpobrotus edulis. Plant Species Biology 34: 11–18.

Puglielli G, Laanisto L, Poorter H, Niinemets U.. 2021. Global patterns of biomass allocation in woody species with different tolerances of shade and drought: evidence for multiple strategies. The New Phytologist 229: 308–322. PubMed

Qi Y, Wei W, Chen C, Chen L.. 2019. Plant root-shoot biomass allocation over diverse biomes: a global synthesis. Global Ecology and Conservation 18: e00606.

R Core Team. 2023. The R project for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Reich PB. 2014. The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology 102: 275–301.

Seibt U, Rajabi A, Griffiths H, Berry JA.. 2008. Carbon isotopes and water use efficiency: sense and sensitivity. Oecologia 155: 441–454. PubMed

Smith‐Martin CM, Xu X, Medvigy D, Schnitzer SA, Powers JS.. 2020. Allometric scaling laws linking biomass and rooting depth vary across ontogeny and functional groups in tropical dry forest lianas and trees. New Phytologist 226: 714–726. PubMed

ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P.. 2012. Canoco reference manual and user’s guide: Software for ordination, version 5.0. Wageningen: Wageningen University & Research.

Vollenweider P, Hildbrand G, De Masi D, et al. . 2023. Above- and below-ground responses to experimental climate forcing in two forb species from montane wooded pastures in Switzerland. Functional Ecology 37: 432–446.

Wilschut RA, van Kleunen M.. 2021. Drought alters plant–soil feedback effects on biomass allocation but not on plant performance. Plant and Soil 462: 285–296.

Wright SD, Mcconnaughay KDM.. 2002. Interpreting phenotypic plasticity: the importance of ontogeny. Plant Species Biology 17: 119–131.

Wu J, Shen Z, Zhang X, Shi P.. 2013. Biomass allocation patterns of alpine grassland species and functional groups along a precipitation gradient on the Northern Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Mountain Science 10: 1097–1108.

Xie J, Tang L, Wang Z, Xu G, Li Y.. 2012. Distinguishing the biomass allocation variance resulting from ontogenetic drift or acclimation to soil texture. PLoS One 7: e41502. PubMed PMC

Xie XF, Hu YK, Pan X, Liu FH, Song YB, Dong M.. 2016. Biomass allocation of stoloniferous and rhizomatous plant in response to resource availability: a phylogenetic meta-analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 603. PubMed PMC

Yan B, Ji Z, Fan B, et al. . 2016. Plants adapted to nutrient limitation allocate less biomass into stems in an arid-hot grassland. The New Phytologist 211: 1232–1240. PubMed

Yin Q, Tian T, Han X, et al. . 2019. The relationships between biomass allocation and plant functional trait. Ecological Indicators 102: 302–308.

Zhang J, Zuo X, Zhao X, Ma J, Medina-Roldán E.. 2020. Effects of rainfall manipulation and nitrogen addition on plant biomass allocation in a semiarid sandy grassland. Scientific Reports 10: 14962. PubMed PMC