BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A significant source of man-made radiation is now linked to medical devices especially X-ray imaging based ones like CT scans which expose the body to cumulative ionizing radiation and thus attendant cancer risks. The aim of this study was to determine whether using a combination of Automatic Tube Current Modulation (ATCM) and Automatic Tube Voltage Selection (ATVS) during two-phase whole-body CT (2PWBCT) examinations would reduce the radiation dose while preserving the image quality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, single-centre study of 127 adult patients who had undergone the 2PWBCT polytraumatic protocol. All were examined on a Somatom Drive scanner (Siemens). The patients were divided into two groups: ATCM only (42 patients) and ATCM +ATVS (85 patients). Patients' arm positions during examination and the examination dose length product (DLP) values were recorded, as well the standard deviations (SD) of the density in reference areas on CT scans for the image quality assessment. The DLP values and image quality in the groups were compared using ANOVA. RESULTS: Mean Total DLP (in mGy*cm): ATCM only: 3337 +/-797, ATCM+ATVS: 3402 +/-830; P=0.674. No effect of arm position (P=0.586). Mean density SD values in reference areas (in HU) in ATCM only: 49 +/-45, 15 +/-6, 9 +/-2, 12 +/-4, 10 +/-3, in ATCM+ATVS: 48 +/-45, 17 +/-6, 11 +/-3, 15 +/-6, 12 +/-4. SD values was higher in ATCM+ATVS group (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Combination of ATVS and ATCM in polytraumatic 2PWBCT leads to no significant radiation load reduction compared with ATCM only but does lead to a slight degradation of image quality. The radiation load is significantly reduced if the patient has their arms behind the head when scanning, regardless of the activation of ATVS.

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague and Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Prague Czech Republic

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague and Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady; 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic

Director's Department Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic

Institute of Psychology Czech Academy of Sciences 110 00 Prague Czech Republic; Department of Psychology Faculty of Arts Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

United Nations Scientific Comitee. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 Report 2008. [cited 2023 July 18]. Online http://www.unscear.org/unscear/uploads/documents/unscear-reports/UNSCEAR_2008_Report_Vol.I-CORR.pdf.

European Commission Radiation Protection Number 154, 2004. [cited 2023 July 18]. Online https://www.sprmn.pt/pdf/RP154.pdf.

European Commission. Medical Radiation Exposure of the European Population. Part 1/2. Radiation Protection No 180. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014.

Hall E, Brenner D. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol 2008;81(965):362-78. DOI

de Gonzáles AB, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 2004; 363(9406):345-51. DOI

de Gonzáles AB, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F, Land C. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(22):2071-7. DOI

Masjedi H, Zare MH, Siahpoush NK, Razavi-Ratki SK, Alavi F, Shabani M. European trends in radiology: investigating factors affecting the number of examinations and the effective dose. Radiol Med 2020;125(3):296-305. doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01109-6. PubMed DOI

Girsa D, Weichet J, Malíková H. Celotělové CT a další zobrazovací metody při vyšetření pacienta s polytraumatem - výsledky dotazníkové studie mezi traumacentry v České republice [Whole-Body CT Scan and Other Imaging Techniques in Examining Polytrauma Patients - Outcomes of a Questionnaire Survey of Trauma Centres in the Czech Republic]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2019;86(5):334-41. (in Czech) DOI

Chidambaram S, Goh EL, Mansoor AK. A meta-analysis of efficiancy of whole-body computed tomography imaging in the management of trauma and injury. Injury 2017;48:1784-93. DOI

Tien HC, Tremblay LN, Rizoli SB, Gelberg J, Spencer F, Caldwell C, Brenneman FD. Radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging in severely injured trauma patients. J Trauma 2007;62(1):151-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31802d9700 PubMed DOI

Mayer C, Meyer M, Fink C, Schmidt B, Sedlmair M, Schoenberg SO, Henzler T. Potential for Radiation Dose Savings in Abdominal and Chest CT Using Automatic Tube Voltage Selection in Combination With Automatic Tube Current Modulation. AJR 2014;203:292-9. DOI

Lee KH, Lee JM, Moon SK, Baek JH, Park JH, Flohr TG, Kim KW, Kim SJ, Han JK, Choi BI. Attenuation-based automatic tube voltage selection and tube current modulation for dose reduction at contrast-enhanced liver CT. Radiology 2012;265(2):437-47. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112434 PubMed DOI

Lv P, Liu J, Zhang R, Jia Y, Gao J. Combined Use of Automatic Tube Voltage Selection and Current Modulation with Iterative Reconstruction for CT Evaluation of Small Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Effect on Lesion Conspicuity and Image Quality. Korean J Radiol 2015;16(3):531-40. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.3.531 PubMed DOI

Lee HS, Suh YJ, Han K, Kim JY, Chang S, Im DJ, Hong YJ, Lee HJ, Hur J, Kim YJ, Choi BW. Effectiveness of automatic tube potential selection with tube current modulation in coronary CT angiography for obese patients: Comparison with a body mass index-based protocol using the propensity score matching method. PLoS One 2018;13(1):e0190584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190584 PubMed DOI