Many animals return to their home areas (i.e., 'homing') after translocation to sites further away. Such translocations have traditionally been used in behavioral ecology to understand the orientation and migration behavior of animals. The movement itself can then be followed by marking and recapturing animals or by tracking, for example, using GPS systems. Most detailed studies investigating this behavior have been conducted in smaller vertebrates (e.g., birds, amphibians, and mice), whereas information on larger mammals, such as red deer, is sparse. We conducted GPS-assisted translocation experiments with red deer at two sites in the Czech Republic. Individuals were translocated over a distance of approximately 11 km and their home journey was tracked. Circular statistics were used to test for significant homeward orientation at distances of 100, 500, 1000, and 5000 m from the release site. In addition, we applied Lavielle trajectory segmentation to identify the different phases of homing behavior. Thirty-one out of 35 translocations resulted in successful homing, with a median time of 4.75 days (range 1.23-100 days). Animals were significantly oriented towards home immediately after release and again when they came closer to home; however, they did not show a significant orientation at the distances in between. We were able to identify three homing phases, an initial 'exploratory phase', followed by a 'homing phase' which sometimes was again followed by an 'arrival phase'. The 'homing phase' was characterized by the straightest paths and fastest movements. However, the variation between translocation events was considerable. We showed good homing abilities of red deer after translocation. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of conducting experiments with environmental manipulations (e.g., to impede the use of sensory cues) close to the release site. The homing behavior of red deer is comparable to that of other species, and might represent general homing behavior patterns in animals. Follow-up studies should further dissect and investigate the drivers of the individual variations observed and try to identify the sensory cues used during homing.

Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic

Department of Spatial Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic

Institute of Zoology University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Gregor Mendel Straße 33 1 1180 Vienna Austria

Research Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior Caesar Ludwig Erhard Allee 2 53175 Bonn Germany

Swansea Lab for Animal Movement Department of Biosciences Swansea University Singleton Park Swansea Wales SA2 8PP UK

See more in PubMed

Alerstam T, Bäckman J. Ecology of animal migration. Curr. Biol. 2018;28:R968–R972. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.043. PubMed DOI

Kashetsky T, Avgar T, Dukas R. The cognitive ecology of animal movement: Evidence from birds and mammals. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2021;9:724887. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.724887. DOI

Milner-Gulland EJ, Fryxell JM, Sinclair ARE. Animal Migration: A Synthesis. Oxford University Press; 2011.

Papi F. Animal Homing. Springer; 2012.

Falcón-Cortés A, Boyer D, Merrill E, Frair JL, Morales JM. Hierarchical, memory-based movement models for translocated elk (Cervus canadensis) Front. Ecol. Evol. 2021;9:702925. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.702925. DOI

Crump ML. Homing and site fidelity in a neotropical frog, Atelopus varius (Bufonidae) Copeia. 1986;1986:438–44. doi: 10.2307/1445001. DOI

Lohmann, K. J., Witherington, B. E., Lohmann, C. M. F. & Salmon, M. Orientation, Navigation, and Natal Beach Homing in Sea Turtles (1997).

Van Moorter B, Visscher D, Benhamou S, Börger L, Boyce MS, Gaillard J-M. Memory keeps you at home: A mechanistic model for home range emergence. Oikos. 2009;118:641–652. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17003.x. DOI

Merkle JA, Fortin D, Morales JM. A memory-based foraging tactic reveals an adaptive mechanism for restricted space use. Ecol. Lett. 2014;17:924–931. doi: 10.1111/ele.12294. PubMed DOI

Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W. Avian navigation: A combination of innate and learned mechanisms. In: Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W, editors. Advances in the Study of Behavior. Elsevier; 2015. pp. 229–310.

Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W. Animal navigation: How animals use environmental factors to find their way. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2023;232:237–252. doi: 10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00610-w. DOI

Sinsch U. Migration and orientation in anuran amphibians. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 1990;2:65–79. doi: 10.1080/08927014.1990.9525494. DOI

Mather JG, Baker RR. Magnetic sense of direction in woodmice for route-based navigation. Nature. 1981 doi: 10.1038/291152a0. DOI

Teferi T, Millar JS. Long distance homing by the deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus. Can. Field-Nat. 1993;107:109–111. doi: 10.5962/p.357085. DOI

Alyan S, Jander R. Short-range homing in the house mouse, Mus musculus: Stages in the learning of directions. Anim. Behav. 1994;48:285–298. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1994.1242. DOI

Chapman JA. Orientation and homing of the brush rabbit (Sylvilagus bachmani) J. Mammal. 1971;52:686–699. doi: 10.2307/1378916. PubMed DOI

Lawes TJ, Anthony RG, Robinson WD, Forbes JT, Lorton GA. Homing behavior and survival of pygmy rabbits after experimental translocation. West. N. Am. Nat. 2012;72:569–581. doi: 10.3398/064.072.0418. DOI

Holland, R. A. Orientation, Navigation and Homing in Bats (2019).

Benediktová K, Adamkova J, Svoboda J, Painter MS, Bartoš L, Novakova P, et al. Magnetic alignment enhances homing efficiency of hunting dogs. Elife. 2020;9:e55080. doi: 10.7554/eLife.55080. PubMed DOI PMC

Rogers, L. L. Homing by black bears and other large mammals. In Proc. Eastern Workshop on Black Bear Management anad Research 76–77 (1984).

Ferguson SH, Elkie PC. Seasonal movement patterns of woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) J. Zool. 2004;262:125–134. doi: 10.1017/S0952836903004552. DOI

Sinsch U, Kirst C. Homeward orientation of displaced newts (Triturus cristatus, Lissotriton vulgaris) is restricted to the range of routine movements. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 2015;28:1–17.

Fischler-Ruiz W, Clark DG, Joshi NR, Devi-Chou V, Kitch L, Schnitzer M, et al. Olfactory landmarks and path integration converge to form a cognitive spatial map. Neuron. 2021;109:4036–4049. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.055. PubMed DOI

Barry RE, Jr, Francq EN. Illumination preference and visual orientation of wild-reared mice, Peromyscus leucopus. Anim. Behav. 1982;30:339–344. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(82)80044-4. DOI

Phillips JB, Youmans PW, Muheim R, Sloan KA, Landler L, Painter MS, et al. Rapid learning of magnetic compass direction by C57BL/6 mice in a 4-armed ‘plus’ water maze. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073112. PubMed DOI PMC

Milligan S, Brown L, Hobson D, Frame P, Stenhouse G. Factors affecting the success of grizzly bear translocations: Grizzly bear translocations. J. Wildl. Manag. 2018;82:519–530. doi: 10.1002/jwmg.21410. DOI

Hawkins RE, Montgomery GG. Movements of translocated deer as determined by telemetry. J. Wildl. Manag. 1969;33:196–203. doi: 10.2307/3799672. DOI

Georgii B, Schröder W. Home range and activity patterns of male red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in the alps. Oecologia. 1983;58:238–248. doi: 10.1007/BF00399224. PubMed DOI

Kropil R, Smolko P, Garaj P. Home range and migration patterns of male red deer Cervus elaphus in Western Carpathians. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2015;61:63–72. doi: 10.1007/s10344-014-0874-4. DOI

Landler L, Ruxton GD, Malkemper EP. The multivariate analysis of variance as a powerful approach for circular data. Mov. Ecol. 2022;10:21. doi: 10.1186/s40462-022-00323-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Pail M, Landler L, Gollmann G. Orientation and navigation in common toads: A quest for repeatability of arena experiments. Herpetozoa. 2020;33:139–147. doi: 10.3897/herpetozoa.33.e52854. PubMed DOI PMC

Agostinelli, C. & Lund, U. R Package Circular: Circular Statistics (2017).

Lavielle M. Detection of multiple changes in a sequence of dependent variables. Stochastic Process. Appl. 1999;83:79–102. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4149(99)00023-X. DOI

Lavielle M. Using penalized contrasts for the change-point problem. Signal Process. 2005;85:1501–1510. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2005.01.012. DOI

Calenge C. The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol. Modell. 2006;197:516–519. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.017. DOI

Calenge, C. Analysis of Animal Movements in R: The adehabitatLT Package (2016).

Freake MJ, Muheim R, Phillips JB. Magnetic maps in animals: A theory comes of age? Q. Rev. Biol. 2006;81:327–347. doi: 10.1086/511528. PubMed DOI

Gagliardo A. Forty years of olfactory navigation in birds. J. Exp. Biol. 2013;216:2165–2171. doi: 10.1242/jeb.070250. PubMed DOI

Schiffner I, Fuhrmann P, Reimann J, Wiltschko R. Behavioural traits of individual homing pigeons, Columba livia F. domestica, in their homing flights. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0201291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201291. PubMed DOI PMC

Bingman VP, Ioalé P, Casini G, Bagnoli P. Hippocampal ablated homing pigeons show a persistent impairment in the time taken to return home. J. Compar. Physiol. A. 1988;163:559–563. doi: 10.1007/BF00604909. DOI

Bingman VP, Mench JA. Homing behavior of hippocampus and parahippocampus lesioned pigeons following short-distance releases. Behav. Brain Res. 1990;40:227–238. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(90)90079-T. PubMed DOI

Gagliardo A, Mazzotto M, Bingman VP. Hippocampal lesion effects on learning strategies in homing pigeons. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 1996;263:529–34.

Poulter S, Hartley T, Lever C. The neurobiology of mammalian navigation. Curr. Biol. 2018;28:R1023–R1042. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.050. PubMed DOI

Engels S, Schneider N-L, Lefeldt N, Hein CM, Zapka M, Michalik A, et al. Anthropogenic electromagnetic noise disrupts magnetic compass orientation in a migratory bird. Nature. 2014;509:353–356. doi: 10.1038/nature13290. PubMed DOI

Kahle D, Wickham H. ggmap: Spatial visualization with ggplot2. R J. 2013;5(1):144–161. doi: 10.32614/RJ-2013-014. DOI

Wilson RP, et al. Animal lifestyle affects acceptable mass limits for attached tags. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 2021;288:20212005. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2005. PubMed DOI PMC