Rationale and design of the ELEANOR trial early aortic valve surgery versus watchful waiting strategy in severe asymptomatic aortic regurgitation, ACRONYM: ELEANOR

. 2024 Apr 30 ; 10 (8) : e29470. [epub] 20240409

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid38638969
Odkazy

PubMed 38638969
PubMed Central PMC11024602
DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29470
PII: S2405-8440(24)05501-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of patients with severe symptomatic aortic regurgitation (AR) is state-of-the-art surgery. Asymptomatic patients with advanced left ventricular (LV) dilatation and/or impaired ejection fraction should undergo surgical treatment, but there is no guidelines consensus on cut-off values for this recommendation. Multimodality imaging has brought new tools for the accurate selection of asymptomatic patients at risk of early clinical deterioration, however, prospective and randomized data are pending. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived AR quantification along with LV remodeling assessment appears to be the most accurate tool for a selection of such patients at risk. TRIAL DESIGN: The objective of our prospective and multicenter study is to determine whether patients at risk of early clinical deterioration as per CMR assessment will benefit from early surgical treatment. The study is designed as a superiority trial to demonstrate that early surgical treatment is safe and more effective than the standard treatment. A total of 217 asymptomatic patients with severe AR, but without current guidelines-based surgical indication, will be enrolled across all centers. We expect 24 % of patients identified as high clinical risk and therefore eligible for 1:1 randomization to early surgical treatment within 3 months or a watchful waiting strategy. Follow-up will be annual. We expect a complete restoration of LV size and function along with improved quality of life and physical performance in a short-term follow-up of 12 months. The primary endpoint will be a composite safety and efficacy with all criteria mandatory: 15 % or larger reduction of baseline CMR-derived LV end-diastolic volume index, LV ejection fraction >50 %, and no major adverse cardiovascular events. The annual follow-up will continue for a minimum of 4 years until the required number of endpoints is achieved to show a statistically significant difference in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in early surgically treated patients. CONCLUSION: The ELEANOR trial is the first multicenter randomized controlled study to compare early surgical treatment with a watchful waiting strategy in asymptomatic patients with chronic severe AR at high risk of early clinical deterioration as per CMR assessment but without guidelines-based indications for surgical treatment.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Singh J.P., Evans J.C., Levy D., et al. Prevalence and clinical determinants of mitral, tricuspid, and aortic regurgitation (the Framingham Heart Study) Am. J. Cardiol. 1999;83(6):897–902. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)01064-9. PubMed DOI

Iung B. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro heart Survey on valvular heart disease. Eur. Heart J. 2003;24(13):1231–1243. doi: 10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00201-X. PubMed DOI

Iung B., Delgado V., Rosenhek R., et al. Contemporary presentation and management of valvular heart disease the EURObservational research programme valvular heart disease II survey. Circulation. 2019;140(14):1156–1169. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041080. PubMed DOI

Kong W.K.F., Bax J.J., Michelena H.I., Delgado V. Sex differences in bicuspid aortic valve disease. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020;63(4):452–456. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.06.004. PubMed DOI

Vahanian A., Beyersdorf F., Praz F., et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur. Heart J. 2022;43(7):561–632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395. PubMed DOI

Writing Committee Members. Otto C.M., Nishimura R.A., et al. ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American college of Cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020;77(4):e25–e197. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.018. 2021. PubMed DOI

Galusko V., Thornton G., Jozsa C., et al. Aortic regurgitation management: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations. Eur Heart J - QCCO. 2022;8(2):113–126. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac001. PubMed DOI

Yang L.T., Michelena H.I., Scott C.G., et al. Outcomes in chronic hemodynamically significant aortic regurgitation and limitations of current guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019;73(14):1741–1752. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.024. PubMed DOI

de Meester C., Gerber B.L., Vancraeynest D., et al. Do guideline-based indications result in an outcome penalty for patients with severe aortic regurgitation? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(11 Pt 1):2126–2138. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.022. PubMed DOI

Mentias A., Feng K., Alashi A., et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with aortic regurgitation and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016;68(20):2144–2153. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.045. PubMed DOI

Malahfji M., Senapati A., Tayal B., et al. Myocardial scar and mortality in chronic aortic regurgitation. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020;9(23) doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018731. PubMed DOI PMC

Desai M.Y. Aortic regurgitation: are we operating too late? Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2019;8(3):39092–39392. doi: 10.3978/16600. PubMed DOI PMC

Dujardin K.S., Enriquez-Sarano M., Schaff H.V., Bailey K.R., Seward J.B., Tajik A.J. Mortality and morbidity of aortic regurgitation in clinical practice. A long-term follow-up study. Circulation. 1999;99(14):1851–1857. PubMed

Myerson S.G., d'Arcy J., Mohiaddin R., et al. Aortic regurgitation quantification using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: association with clinical outcome. Circulation. 2012;126(12):1452–1460. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.083600. PubMed DOI

Harris A.W., Krieger E.V., Kim M., et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus transthoracic echocardiography for prediction of outcomes in chronic aortic or mitral regurgitation. Am. J. Cardiol. 2017;119(7):1074–1081. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.12.017. PubMed DOI

Vejpongsa P., Xu J., Quinones M.A., Shah D.J., Zoghbi W.A. Differences in cardiac remodeling in left-sided valvular regurgitation. JACC (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.): Cardiovascular Imaging. 2022;15(10):1730–1741. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.05.006. PubMed DOI

Kočková R., Línková H., Hlubocká Z., et al. Multiparametric strategy to predict early disease decompensation in asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15(12) doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.122.014901. PubMed DOI

Alashi A., Khullar T., Mentias A., et al. Long-term outcomes after aortic valve surgery in patients with asymptomatic chronic aortic regurgitation and preserved LVEF: impact of baseline and follow-up global longitudinal strain. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(1 Pt 1):12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.021. PubMed DOI

Kammerlander A.A., Wiesinger M., Duca F., et al. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in aortic regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(8 Pt 1):1474–1483. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.08.036. PubMed DOI

Weber M., Hausen M., Arnold R., et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Int. J. Cardiol. 2008;127(3):321–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.07.174. PubMed DOI

Pizarro R., Bazzino O.O., Oberti P.F., et al. Prospective validation of the prognostic usefulness of B-type natriuretic peptide in asymptomatic patients with chronic severe aortic regurgitation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011;58(16):1705–1714. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.016. PubMed DOI

Senapati A., Malahfji M., Debs D., et al. Regional replacement and diffuse interstitial fibrosis in aortic regurgitation. JACC (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.): Cardiovascular Imaging. 2021;14(11):2170–2182. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.04.028. PubMed DOI

Hammermeister K., Sethi G.K., Henderson W.G., Grover F.L., Oprian C., Rahimtoola S.H. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2000;36(4):1152–1158. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00834-2. PubMed DOI

Glaser N., Persson M., Jackson V., Holzmann M.J., Franco-Cereceda A., Sartipy U. Loss in life expectancy after surgical aortic valve replacement: SWEDEHEART study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019;74(1):26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.053. PubMed DOI

Arabkhani B., Mookhoek A., Di Centa I., et al. Reported outcome after valve-sparing aortic root replacement for aortic root aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2015;100(3):1126–1131. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.093. PubMed DOI

Gofus J., Fila P., Drabkova S., et al. Ross procedure provides survival benefit over mechanical valve in adults: a propensity-matched nationwide analysis. Eur. J. Cardio. Thorac. Surg. 2022;61(6):1357–1365. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac013. PubMed DOI

Steeds R.P., Myerson S.G. Imaging assessment of mitral and aortic regurgitation: current state of the art. Heart. 2020;106(22):1769–1776. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316216. PubMed DOI PMC

Lancellotti P., Tribouilloy C., Hagendorff A., et al. Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J - Cardiovascular Imaging. 2013;14(7):611–644. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet105. PubMed DOI

Kockova R., Linkova H., Hlubocka Z., et al. New imaging markers of clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation. J. Clin. Med. 2019;8(10) doi: 10.3390/jcm8101654. PubMed DOI PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...