Exploring the potential of ChatGPT for foreign language education at the university level
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
38655215
PubMed Central
PMC11036125
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1269319
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- AI technology, ChatGPT, L2 acquisition, foreign language learning, university students,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to explore students' attitudes and perceived usefulness of using ChatGPT for learning a foreign language to reveal how this new trend tool affects its end-users. METHODS: The authors conducted qualitative research by using a questionnaire survey based on hands-on experience by university students. RESULTS: The findings reveal that students are fascinated, satisfied, and stimulated to use this technology despite some of their reservations and potential threats. The authors of this study also list pedagogical implications, including specific activities, while using ChatGPT. DISCUSSION: Although ChatGPT can be very beneficial for teachers and help them in their preparation, it sets a challenging task for them to change the existing teaching approaches and assessments to boost students' cognitive, creative, and critical thinking skills. In addition, both teachers and students will have to upskill their competencies to handle the current advancements in AI technology, such as ChatGPT.
Department of Applied Linguistics University of Hradec Kralove Rokitanskeho Hradec Kralove Czechia
English Department College of Education for Human Sciences University of Diyala Baqubah Iraq
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Algaraady J., Mahyoob M. (2023). ChatGPT’s capabilities in spotting and analyzing writing errors experienced by EFL learners. Arab World Eng. J. 9, 3–17. doi: 10.24093/awej/call9.1 DOI
Al-Obaydi L. H., Shakki F., Tawafak R. M., Pikhart M., Ugla R. L. (2023). What I know, what I want to know, what I learned: activating EFL college students’ cognitive, behavioral, and emotional engagement through structured feedback in an online environment. Front. Psychol. 13:1083673. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1083673, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Ashfaque M. W., Tharewal S., Iqhbal S., et al. . (2020). A review on techniques, characteristics and approaches to an intelligent tutoring chatbot system. In 2020 International Conference on Smart Innovations in Design, Environment, Management, Planning and Computing (ICSIDEMPC) IEEE.
Barrot J. S. (2023). ChatGPT as a language learning tool: an emerging technology report. Tech Know Learn. doi: 10.1007/s10758-023-09711-4 DOI
Belda-Medina J., Calvo-Ferrer J. R. (2022). Using chatbots as AI conversational partners in language learning. Appl. Sci. 12:8427. doi: 10.3390/app12178427 DOI
Doncheva J. (2014). Consolidating functions of Bulgarian children’s folk games in preschool. Ruse: PublishingHaus Mediateh.
Dowling M. M., Lucey B. M. (2023). ChatGPT for (finance) research: the Bananarama conjecture. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4322651 (Accessed 22 February 2023)
Dwivedi Y. K., Kshetri N., Hughes L., Slade E. L., Jeyaraj A., Kar A. K., et al. . (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 71:102642. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 DOI
Firat M. (2023). How chat GPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education?
Fryer L. K., Nakao K., Thompson A. (2019). Chatbot learning partners: connecting learning experiences, interest, and competence. Comput. Hum. Behav. 93, 279–289. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.023 DOI
Gayed J. M., Carlon M. K. J., Oriola A. M., Cross J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing assistant’s impact on English language learners. Comp. Educ. Artif. Intell. 3:100055. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055 DOI
Glen S. (2022). ChatGPT writes code, but won't replace developers. Available at: https://www.techtarget.com/searchsoftwarequality/news/252528379/ChatGPT-writes-code-but-wont-replace-developers (Accessed 4 March 2023).
Grassini S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Educ. Sci. 13:692. doi: 10.3390/educsci13070692 DOI
Huang W., Hew K. F., Fryer L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning – are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 38, 237–257. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12610 DOI
IPL . (2023). Available at: https://www.ipl.org/category/chatgpt/ (Accessed 4 March 2023).
Kasneci E., Seßler K., Küchemann S., Bannert M., Dementieva D., Fischer F., et al. . (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education.
Kim N. (2019). A study on the use of artificial intelligence chatbots for improving English grammar skills. J. Dig. Converg. 17, 37–46.
King M. R., ChatGPT. (2023). A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 16, 1–2. doi: 10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Klimova B., Al-Obaydi L. H. (2023). Use of Mobile applications for foreign language learning among university students: needs and functions. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 17, 28–39. doi: 10.3991/ijim.v17i12.38541 DOI
Klimova B., Pikhart M. (2022). Application of corrective feedback using emerging technologies among L2 university students. Cog. Educ. 9, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2132681 DOI
Klimova B., Pikhart M., Delorme Benites A., Lehr C., Sanchez-Stockhammer C. (2023). Neural machine translation in foreign language teaching and learning: a systematic review. Educ. Inf. Technol. 28, 663–682. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11194-2 DOI
Klimova B., Pikhart M., Kacetl J. (2023). Ethical issues of the use of AI-driven mobile apps for education. Front. Public Health 10:1118116. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1118116, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Kohnke L., Moorhouse B. L., Zou D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC J. 54, 537–550. doi: 10.1177/00336882231162868 DOI
Kooli C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: a critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustain. For. 15:5614. doi: 10.3390/su15075614 DOI
Lee J. H., Yang H., Shin D., Kim H. (2020). Chatbots – technology for the language teacher. ELT J. 74, 338–344. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccaa035 DOI
Liu X. (2022). The relation of input, interaction, and output in SLA. Adv. Econ. Bus. Manag. Res. 652, 474–479.
Mageira K., Pittou D., Papasalouros A., Kotis K., Zangogianni P., Daradoumis A. (2022). Educational AI chatbots for content and language integrated learning. Appl. Sci. 12:3239. doi: 10.3390/app12073239 DOI
Naidu A. (2019). Review: Impact of artificial intelligence on society. Available at: https://csp.iisc.ac.in/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/01A092019-Review-Impact-of-Artificial-Intelligence-on-Society.pdf (Accessed on 22 February 2023).
Ofgang E. (2022). What is ChatGPT and how can you teach with it? Tips & tricks. Tech. Learn.
Petrović J., Jovanović M. (2021). The role of chatbots in foreign language learning: the present situation and the future outlook. Stud. Comput. Intell. 973, 313–330. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-72711-6_17 DOI
Pikhart M., Klimova B., Al-Obaydi L. H., Dziuba S., Cierniak-Emerych A. (2022). The quantitative evaluation of subjective satisfaction with digital media in L2 acquisition in younger adults: a study from Europe, Asia, and Latin America. Front. Psychol. 13:946187. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946187, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Poláková P., Klímová B. (2022). Vocabulary mobile learning application in blended English language learning. Front. Psychol. 13:869055. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869055, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Reiss M. J. (2021). The use of AI in education: practicalities and ethical considerations. Lond. Rev. Educ. 19, 1–14. doi: 10.14324/LRE.19.1.05 DOI
Rettberg J. W. (2022). ChatGPT is multilingual but monocultural, and it’s learning your values. Blog entry. Available at: https://jilltxt.net/right-now-chatgpt-is-multilingual-but-monocultural-butits-learning-your-values/ (Accessed 28 January 2022).
Smutny P., Schreiberova P. (2020). Chatbots for learning: a review of educational chatbots for the Facebook messenger. Comput. Educ. 151:103862. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862 DOI
Tawafak R. M., Al-Obaydi L. H., Pikhart M. (2023). Competency categorization and roles of online teachers from the perspective of university students. Front. Psychol. 14:1009000. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1009000, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Tlili A., Shehata B., Adarkwah M. A., Bozkurt A., Hickey D. T., Huang R., et al. . (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learn. Environ. 10:15. doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x DOI
Voinohovska V., Doncheva Julia. (2022). Integration of information and communication technologies in educational theory and practice. In: Proceedings of INTED2022 Conference, 2022
Xiao Y., Zhi Y. (2023). An exploratory study of EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: experience and perceptions. Languages 8:212. doi: 10.3390/languages8030212 DOI
Zhai X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: implications for education. SSRN Electron. J. 1–10. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4312418 DOI