Efficacy of Single- and Dual-Docking Robotic Surgery of Paraaortic and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
RPMP.01.02.01-12-0070/20-00
European Union
PubMed
38793024
PubMed Central
PMC11122409
DOI
10.3390/jpm14050441
PII: jpm14050441
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- dual docking, endometrial cancer, paraaortic lymphadenectomy, robotic surgery, single docking,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
(1) The surgical method of choice for the treatment of endometrial cancer is minimally invasive surgery. In cases of high-risk endometrial cancer, completed paraaortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy are indicated. The aim of this study was to analyze the types of docking during robotic surgery assisted with the da Vinci X system while performing paraaortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. (2) Methods: A total of 25 patients with high-risk endometrial cancer, with a mean age of 60.07 ± 10.67 (range 34.69-83.23) years, and with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.4 ± 5.62 (range 18-41.5) kg/m2, were included in this study. The analyzed population was divided into groups that underwent single or dual docking during surgery. (3) Results: No statistical significance was observed between single and dual docking during paraaortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy and between the type of docking and the duration of the operation. However, there was a statistically significant correlation between the duration of the operation and previous surgery (p < 0.005). The number of removed lymph nodes was statistically associated with BMI (p < 0.005): 15.87 ± 6.83 and 24.5 ± 8.7 for paraaortic and pelvic lymph nodes, respectively, in cases of single docking, and 18.05 ± 7.92 and 24.88 ± 11.75 for paraaortic and pelvic lymph nodes, respectively, in cases of dual docking. (4) Conclusions: The robot-assisted approach is a good surgical method for lymphadenectomy for obese patients, and, despite the type of docking, there are no differences in the quality of surgery.
Faculty of Medicine Lazarski University 02 662 Warsaw Poland
LUX MED Oncology Hospital św Wincentego 103 03 291 Warsaw Poland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Concin N., Matias-Guiu X., Vergote I., Cibula D., Mirza M., Marnitz S., Ledermann J., Bosse T., Chargari C., Fagotti A., et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2021;31:12–39. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230. PubMed DOI
Gray L. Lymph node excision in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. Am. J. Surg. 1964;108:660–663. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(64)90109-6. PubMed DOI
Lewis G. Surgery for Endometrial Cancer. Cancer. 1981;48:568–574. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810715)48:1+<568::AID-CNCR2820481321>3.0.CO;2-2. PubMed DOI
Creasman W., Morrow C., Bundy B., Homesley H., Graham J., Heller P. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 1987;60:2035–2041. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19901015)60:8+<2035::AID-CNCR2820601515>3.0.CO;2-8. PubMed DOI
Aalders J., Thomas G. Endometrial cancer-revisiting the importance of pelvic and para aortic lymph nodes. Gynecol. Oncol. 2007;104:222–231. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.10.013. PubMed DOI
Mariani A., Webb M., Rao S., Lesnick T., Podratz K. Significance of pathologic patterns of pelvic lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2001;80:113–120. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.6050. PubMed DOI
Mariani A., Dowdy S.C., Cliby W.A., Gostout B.S., Jones M.B., Wilson T.O., Podratz K.C. Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: A paradigm shift in surgical staging. Gynecol. Oncol. 2008;109:11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.023. PubMed DOI PMC
Kodama S., Kase H., Tanaka K., Matsui K. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients with endometrial cancer. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 1996;53:23–30. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(95)02643-6. PubMed DOI
Fisher B. The revolution in breast cancer surgery: Science or anecdotalism? World J. Surg. 1985;9:655–666. doi: 10.1007/BF01655177. PubMed DOI
Hellman S. Karnofsky Memorial Lecture. Natural history of small breast cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 1994;12:2229–2234. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.10.2229. PubMed DOI
Kitchener H., Swart A., Qian Q., Amos C., Parmar M. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): A randomised study. Lancet. 2009;373:125–136. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61766-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Panici P.B., Basile S., Maneschi F., Lissoni A.A., Signorelli M., Scambia G., Angioli R., Tateo S., Mangili G., Katsaros D., et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: Randomized clinical trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1707–1716. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn397. PubMed DOI
Lee H.J., Lee Y.H., Chong G.O., Hong D.G., Lee Y.S. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2018;44:547–555. doi: 10.1111/jog.13535. PubMed DOI
Heinemann M., Masquin I., Blache G., Sabiani L., Jauffret C., Houvenaeghel G., Lambaudie E. Transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy by robot assisted laparoscopy in 10 steps. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2019;30:74. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e74. PubMed DOI PMC
Venigalla S., Chowdhry A., Shalowitz D. Survival implications of staging lymphadenectomy for non-endometrioid endometrial cancers. Gynecol. Oncol. 2018;149:531–538. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.03.046. PubMed DOI
Papathemelis T., Hassas D., Gerken M., Klinkhammer-Schalke M., Scharl A., Lux M., Beckmann M., Scharl S. Is there a benefit of lymphadenectomy for overall and recurrence-free survival in type I FIGO IB G1-2 endometrial carcinoma? A retrospective population-based cohort analysis. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2018;144:2019–2027. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2715-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Papathemelis T., Scharl S., Kronberger K., Gerken M., Scharl A., Pauer A., Klinkhammer-Schalke M. Survival benefit of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in high-grade endometrial carcinoma: A retrospective population-based cohort analysis. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2017;143:2555–2562. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2508-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Konno Y., Asano H., Shikama A., Aoki D., Tanikawa M., Oki A., Horie K., Mitsuhashi A., Kikuchi A., Tokunaga H., et al. Lymphadenectomy issues in endometrial cancer. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2021;32:25. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e25. PubMed DOI PMC
Watari H., Katayama H., Shibata T., Ushijima K., Satoh T., Onda T., Aoki D., Fukuda H., Yaegashi N., Sakuragi N., et al. Phase III trial to confirm the superiority of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy to pelvic lymphadenectomy alone for endometrial cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 1412 (SEPAL-P3) Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017;47:986–990. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyx108. PubMed DOI
Todo Y., Kato H., Kaneuchi M., Watari H., Takeda M., Sakuragi N. Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): A retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:1165–1172. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62002-X. PubMed DOI
Marek R., Dzvinčuk P., Hambálek J., Maděrka M., Jančeková V., Kolářová V., Langová K., Pilka R. Robotic paraaortic lymphadenectomy in oncogynecology. Double side docking of daVinci S system increases the success rates of high paraaortic lymph node dissection in endometrial cancer. Ceska Gynekol. 2019;84:4–17. PubMed
Gallotta V., Federico A., Gaballa K., D’Indinosante M., Conte C., Giudice M.T., Naldini A., Lodoli C., Rotolo S., Gallucci V., et al. The role of robotic aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancer: Surgical and oncological outcome in a single institution experience. J. Surg. Oncol. 2019;119:355–360. doi: 10.1002/jso.25335. PubMed DOI
Persson J., Salehi S., Bollino M., Lönnerfors C., Falconer H., Geppert B. Pelvic Sentinel lymph node detection in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer (SHREC-trial)-the final step towards a paradigm shift in surgical staging. Eur. J. Cancer. 2019;116:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.025. PubMed DOI
Geppert B., Persson J. Robotic infrarenal paraaortic and pelvic nodal staging for endometrial cancer: Feasibility and lymphatic complications. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2015;94:1074–1081. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12712. PubMed DOI
Soliman P., Frumovitz M., Spannuth W. Lymphadenectomy during endometrial cancer staging: Practice patterns among gynecologic oncologists. Gynecol. Oncol. 2010;119:291–294. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.07.011. PubMed DOI PMC
AlHilli M., Mariani A. The role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;18:193–199. doi: 10.1007/s10147-013-0528-7. PubMed DOI
Ekdahl L., Salehi S., Falconer H. Improving Double Docking for Robot-assisted Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy in Endometrial Cancer Staging: Technique and Surgical Outcomes. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23:818–824. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.023. PubMed DOI
Mäenpää M., Nieminen K., Tomás E., Luukkaala T., Mäenpää J. Robotic-Assisted Infrarenal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecological Cancers: Technique and Surgical Outcomes. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2018;28:951–958. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001249. PubMed DOI
Mariani A., Keeney G., Aletti G., Webb M., Haddock M., Podratz K. Endometrial carcinoma: Paraaortic dissemination. Gynecol. Oncol. 2004;92:833–838. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.11.032. PubMed DOI
Morrow C., Bundy B., Kurman R., Creasman W., Heller P., Homesley H., Graham J. Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol. Oncol. 1991;40:55–65. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(91)90086-K. PubMed DOI
Lutman C.V., Havrilesky L.J., Cragun J.M., Secord A.A., Calingaert B., Berchuck A., Clarke-Pearson D.L., Soper J.T. Pelvic lymph node count is an important prognostic variable for FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology. Gynecol. Oncol. 2006;102:92–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.11.032. PubMed DOI
Abu-Rustum N.R., Iasonos A., Zhou Q., Oke E., Soslow R.A., Alektiar K.M., Chi D.S., Barakat R.R. Is there a therapeutic impact to regional lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008;198:457. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.010. PubMed DOI
Bakkum-Gamez J.N., Mariani A., Dowdy S.C., Weaver A.L., McGree M.E., Cliby W.A., Gostout B.S., Stanhope C.R., Wilson T.O., Podratz K.C. The impact of surgical guidelines and periodic quality assessment on the staging of endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2011;123:58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.06.018. PubMed DOI
Abu-Rustum N., Gomez J., Alektiar K., Soslow R., Hensley M., Leitao Jr M., Gardner G., Sonoda Y., Dennis S.C., Barakat R. The incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes. Gynecol. Oncol. 2009;115:236–238. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.07.016. PubMed DOI
Abu-Rustum N., Chi D., Leitao M., Oke E., Hensley M., Alektiar K., Barakat R. What is the incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal recurrence in grade 1 endometrial carcinoma? Gynecol. Oncol. 2008;111:46–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.010. PubMed DOI
Salman L., Cusimano M., Marchocki Z., Ferguson S. Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in High-Grade Endometrial Cancer. Curr. Oncol. 2022;29:1123–1135. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29020096. PubMed DOI PMC
Li Z., Zhang W., Luo Z., Huang J., Li L. Clinical study of the clinical characteristics and prognosis of 1219 cases of endometrial cancer with lymph node metastasis. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2021;40:1601–1611. doi: 10.1177/09603271211008506. PubMed DOI
Nakao K., Sasaki H., Nishimura T., Banno H., Otsuka K., Hirabuki S., Hoshiba T. Periaortic Abdominal Fat Area as a Predictor of Surgical Difficulties during Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27:1377–1382. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.016. PubMed DOI
Dowdy S., Aletti G., Cliby W., Podratz K., Mariani A. Extra-peritoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy-a prospective cohort study of 293 patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2008;111:418–424. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.021. PubMed DOI PMC
Todo Y., Suzuki Y., Azuma M., Hatanaka Y., Konno Y., Watari H., Kato H., Matsuno Y., Yamashiro K., Sakuragi N. Ultrastaging of para-aortic lymph nodes in stage IIIC1 endometrial cancer: A preliminary report. Gynecol. Oncol. 2012;127:532–537. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.026. PubMed DOI
Jamieson A., Thompson E., Huvila J., Leung S., Lum A., Morin C., Ennour-Idrissi K., Sebastianelli A., Renaud M., Gregoire J., et al. Endometrial carcinoma molecular subtype correlates with the presence of lymph node metastases. Gynecol. Oncol. 2022;165:376–384. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.025. PubMed DOI